I will wonder what would happen if a general poster suggested a staff member had an agenda instead of engaging with what was posted. An attack the post not the poster kind of thing?
When I posted that you had just, laughably, accused
@VorZakone of all posters of guarding a “narrative”.
@VorZakone who basically functions as the Cafe aggregator in these threads and posts from a wider range of sources, reflecting a wider range of perspectives, than anyone else (thank you
@VorZakone).
Speaking for myself I certainly have my biases as does everyone else here, so if you discern a particular agenda on my part you are free to note it.
I find your own posts in this thread and the other related one to be reflective, whether consciously or otherwise, of a conspiratorial approach to thinking about questions concerning Jews, antisemitism, and Israel. Cumulatively they suggest to me an agenda to downplay the seriousness of the dangers Jews face in this world, hint that Jews themselves may be over-stating them or perhaps responsible in some way, and by extension absolve the actual perpetrators of attacks on Jews of responsibility for their actions. This is disregarding certain instances where you have just blatantly posted fake stuff (one old example
here).
There is of course a possibility that you are genuinely ignorant of how your pattern of posting might appear to others here, in which case you should try to understand why some of us don’t really buy the “I’m just into alternative viewpoints, who knows if I’m right or wrong?” type explanation.