Zen86
Full Member
Bad move for both parties. Nothing to cry about.
Wum of a month surely.Proof that Man Utd is becoming more and more irrelevant with each passing transfer window. Top English players don't want to join anymore. City or Chelsea it is.
Doubt we were even in for him this summer.Proof that Man Utd is becoming more and more irrelevant with each passing transfer window. Top English players don't want to join anymore. City or Chelsea it is.
Jadon Sancho.Proof that Man Utd is becoming more and more irrelevant with each passing transfer window. Top English players don't want to join anymore. City or Chelsea it is.
he’s played mainly second division football. Couple of decent seasons in the premier league with some injuries. Seemingly decent but he might be one of these that gets lost when he isnt the star of an also ran team. Like Zaha - hes mediocre but at palace absolutely everything is played through him which makes him look better.I think he's a top player but still massively overrated. Spoken of as the 2nd coming of George Best or something.
proof they'll let just about anyone with a keyboard get on the internet.....c'mon mate that's pure bollocks and a WUM it bloody obvious. No one is going to outspend City or Chelsea when they are funded by a country and a russian criminal.Proof that Man Utd is becoming more and more irrelevant with each passing transfer window. Top English players don't want to join anymore. City or Chelsea it is.
I agree. You can only have 11 players on the pitch. If he plays then sterling or mahrez or de brunye or silva or torres or foden wont so it doesnt add much to the overall picture other than that you can put out a world class second 11 for an fa cup 3rd round tie at scunthorpe.really couldn’t careless about this one tbh.
yes Grealish is a good player but he isn’t any better than what they’ve got at the moment.
WTF are they smoking over at City? Imagine how much they'll pay Kane a week ontop of his transfer fee nowTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
do you reckon they will sign kane?WTF are they smoking over at City? Imagine how much they'll pay Kane a week ontop of his transfer fee now
Well ofcourse. Kane hadnt wrecked his relationship with his club if he werent sure City would sign him.do you reckon they will sign kane?
yes thats exactly my point, i don’t think Grealish is as good as any of those you’ve mentioned.I agree. You can only have 11 players on the pitch. If he plays then sterling or mahrez or de brunye or silva or torres or foden wont so it doesnt add much to the overall picture other than that you can put out a world class second 11 for an fa cup 3rd round tie at scunthorpe.
its no real achievement to build a squad of two £50m+ Players In each position and win stuff.
I dunno, I did think Grealish was Pep's consolation prize from his board for not delivering Kane (because surely no club is going to spend 250m on just 2 players in 1 window) but that was before Kane decided to be a prick now I'm 50/50do you reckon they will sign kane?
This was what i was thinking. Kanes antics look like he is trying to break Levy down and force spurs hand in the sale. With Chelsea after lukaku i cant see where else he could be goingWell ofcourse. Kane hadnt wrecked his relationship with his club if he werent sure City would sign him.
Nah even give them Kane and let Lukaku go to Chelsea. Give us a clear run at Haaland. Grealish and Kane in their front 3 would have no pace in it and no threat in behind.yes thats exactly my point, i don’t think Grealish is as good as any of those you’ve mentioned.
if they’d have signed Kane then I’d have been worried as he fits what they need much more but Grealish? I really don’t care.
That's absolutely insane for a club who can't even fill up their own stadium.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
i actually think it might happen. they can spend 250. Thats what happens when a club breaks FFP and all they get is a little fine.I dunno, I did think Grealish was Pep's consolation prize from his board for not delivering Kane (because surely no club is going to spend 250m on just 2 players in 1 window) but that was before Kane decided to be a prick now I'm 50/50
For me it's not about that. It's about the fact that last year we could have had him, and that he was a player that genuinely would have preferred us but had no "option" but to make this move.really couldn’t careless about this one tbh.
yes Grealish is a good player but he isn’t any better than what they’ve got at the moment.
It's really closer to only £368,589 per WEEK.That's absolutely insane for a club who can't even fill up their own stadium.
he isnt, and if you asked city fans 6 months ago, theyd have said the same.I’ve long been a Grealish fan but I’m not sure if he’s that much better than Bernardo Silva if at all.
And you can probably double that quoted figure via some dodgy offshore account.WTF are they smoking over at City? Imagine how much they'll pay Kane a week ontop of his transfer fee now
AgreedQuite envious of this one, he would’ve been a crowd favourite with us and you can just tell that he has all the qualities needed of a United player whilst seemingly loving the club.
Think he’ll do well at City, happy for him in a way just gutted it’s City he’s gone to. Like I said quite envious but this is life and unfortunately the timing wasn’t there.