Jack Grealish | Man City

Wasn't too bad today but he's going to have to learn to be a lot quicker with the ball at City. I'd say best of our front 4 (Sterling, Torres, Mahrez and himself) though that in itself doesn't mean much when we were so poor.
 
"Better than Bruno"

"Sell Pogba to make space for him"

I didn't watch him much for Villa, what's he supposed to be??? Not like Pogba/KDB picking passes and crosses from anywhere, not an individualist like Mahrez or Robben, not a speed merchant like Rashford.
Vaguely remember one half of United vs Villa when he was a menacing dribbler without much end-product, is that what City want? This match he was doing the same things as Sterling, at a lower level.
 
Lots can still happen, but this really is an odd signing. Dumping £100m on a single player in an area, where they arguably needed it the least is frankly bizarre.
 
Never really saw it with him to be honest. Good solid player obviouisly, but when people have compared him to Ryan fecking Giggs, and even Ronaldinho, er no. :lol:
 
Wasn't too bad today but he's going to have to learn to be a lot quicker with the ball at City. I'd say best of our front 4 (Sterling, Torres, Mahrez and himself) though that in itself doesn't mean much when we were so poor.
That’s his whole remit, though. Give it to super Jack and let him dribble for a bit. It’s going to take some going to drain the heroball out of him.
 
He's a good player but he's not a 100m player in the slightest and not convinced he ever will be.
 
I know it's the first game, but he is NOT City player, AT ALL! I could eat more words one day, but glad those wankers got beat today, sans Kane!
 
He’s a good player and this is only one game and I’d of loved him at United but joining a plastic club like City and watching him lose his cool and generally being anonymous was quite satisfying.

I don’t think he’ll be anonymous for long though.
 
Turns out fouls drawn is not an adequate measure of quality. Those comparing this guy to Bruno, give your heads a wobble.
 
Plays best when there’s a team of willing runners set up to get the ball to him or from him all the time. In City’s team today he stuck out without half a team designed just to back him up, and it’ll be even harder when De Bruyne is back, since he’s the one at city that everyone wants to find all the time. He’ll get better as he gets coached and gets to know his teammates, but it looked a poor fit on paper going to City, and today didn’t change my mind.
 
That’s his whole remit, though. Give it to super Jack and let him dribble for a bit. It’s going to take some going to drain the heroball out of him.

Its not about dribbling as much as learning to do it, higher up the pitch only. His dribbling near the box was decent to be fair. His dribbling around in midfield was pointless, cut passing options and confused an admittedly idiotic Mendy on when he was/wasn't gonna get the ball.
 
This was just his first match for City. And he wasn't even that bad really, he was average at worst. So many shitty takes now. Let's be less short-sighted and immediatist. Every player has games below their best.
 
That’s his whole remit, though. Give it to super Jack and let him dribble for a bit. It’s going to take some going to drain the heroball out of him.
This is the confusing part with this transfer, his main quality is something he will need to hold back on, which begs the question, does this transfer actually improve them?

I very much think they bought him for his image to try to gain more public connection. Which would be :lol:
 
Seriously though, I think playing with KDB will benefit him greatly once they start to gel together. He's still a brilliant player and judging him from one game is beyond silly.
 
It's quite obvious he just flat out isn't what City need. The biggest benefit he provides them is a transition plan after De Bruyne, while being nowhere near as good. But they need directness, pace in behind, a goal threat. Rashford would be absolutely massive for them. Grealish does feck all for them.
 
Its not about dribbling as much as learning to do it, higher up the pitch only. His dribbling near the box was decent to be fair. His dribbling around in midfield was pointless, cut passing options and confused an admittedly idiotic Mendy on when he was/wasn't gonna get the ball.
This was confusing the feck out of me :lol:

Makes sense when you put it this way.
 
This was just his first match for City. And he wasn't even that bad really, he was average at worst. So many shitty takes now. Let's be less short-sighted and immediatist. Every player has games below their best.

Nah man, one game in and one 6/10 performance, this is the Caf, he's clearly finished, what age is he now 25... too old. Caf logic, Grealish is washed, City relegated and United champions.
 
Seriously though, I think playing with KDB will benefit him greatly once they start to gel together. He's still a brilliant player and judging him from one game is beyond silly.
Not silly. We are hoping he plays shit like that in city's shirt till he moves out.
 
Said it all summer he’s going to flop big time

The people in here suggesting he’s better than Bruno should quit watching football you’re fecking clueless

He scored 8 goals in the league in 2019 and 6 in 2020. I posted this on the day when his transfer was made official with the question what he at age 25 has done statistically to warrant a 100 milion pound transfer? He clearly has talent but by no means would i describe him as the most talented english player at 25 years of age. He may become a very good system player at City. Bruyne, Sterling all developed to a new level. However, the transfer amount of 100 milion is what i raise questions about.
 
Grealish is a capable player, definitely not better than bruno or pogba etc, but still a very good quality player there. I think he is still in Villa mode. Pep will turn him into his player eventually.
 
I like Graelish a lot, but is “drawing fouls” really that significant of a selling point? It’s weird that that gets mentioned so much as some sort of defining characteristic.

Hazard used to draw a lot of fouls as well, and Ronaldo back when he was here, but no one ever really talked about that.
 
Great player but feels like a stand-still signing for City. They seem to have another 150m for Kane, though, so no headaches I guess :)

Also, am I the only one who thinks that Grealish in a City jersey just looks wrong? I always thought he would go to an actual big club if he ever left Villa, not to City. He looks like he sold his soul.
 
This was just his first match for City. And he wasn't even that bad really, he was average at worst. So many shitty takes now. Let's be less short-sighted and immediatist. Every player has games below their best.
Caf hangs its hat on every game week. I’m afraid you’ll find Pep is finished, Kane is deadwood, Grealish is Morten Gamst Pedersen and Son is peak Hazard.
 
Nah man, one game in and one 6/10 performance, this is the Caf, he's clearly finished, what age is he now 25... too old. Caf logic, Grealish is washed, City relegated and United champions.

I dont think posters are saying he is 'finished', far from that. Me, personally, i ask the question what he had achieved at age 25 to warrant a 100 milion pound transfer? He clearly is a talented player who can under a world class manager develop to a next level. He will need some time to suit the system and to get accustomed to the playing style and tactics.
 
Last edited:
I think he will change his style of play, he slowed down the attacks and you can see the difference when KdB had the ball. His first instinct is to create and he releases the ball quickly to keep the move going. Grealish will adapt to his new teammates, they all are good enough to create chances.