charlenefan
Far less insightful than the other Charley
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2005
- Messages
- 33,052
Enough of the speculation, who's better?
Last edited:
Yeah, it's called 'Eboue'Is there a Jesse Lingard option?
Other day I was thinking about these 2 options and felt the same about Grealish. We need a player with attitude like him.Grealish for me. Has the swagger and is a big game player.
Second one when they were younger, first one now.When people such as these two meet, do they think "This guy looks as much an arrogant twat as I do, let's hit the town later" or "There can be only one"?
Agreed. Grealish seems the better choice if Pogba stays, and Maddison if Pogba goes.Grealish is what I call a transitional midfielder - used to be the player that takes the ball from midfield to attacking midfield before passing.
Maddison has much more of an ability to make a creative and a penetrative pass even if Grealish has better short pass abilities over all.
They are different players, if we buy Grealish to play him CAM we won't be getting the best out of him & if we play Maddison at CM or LCM then neither would we.
Yes considering they'd eat up most of our budget. If Bruno comes we don't need Maddison anyway.Would both be a terrible plan?
More asking in theory i guess.Yes considering they'd eat up most of our budget. If Bruno comes we don't need Maddison anyway.
Think the commentator said they were pals off the pitch? Wouldn’t surprise me either. Strange then that people have called out Maddison as a bit of a twat, but Grealish as having a great mentalityWhen people such as these two meet, do they think "This guy looks as much an arrogant twat as I do, let's hit the town later" or "There can be only one"?
Wouldn't mind if that was our plan of replacing Pogba.Would both be a terrible plan?
Grealish can play deeper and is suited a bit to the left. Every time I watch him his ability seems to be his capability to get past 2 or 3 players in transition usually in crowded midfield, attacking midfielder areas before making a simple pass in to someone to space.Agreed. Grealish seems the better choice if Pogba stays, and Maddison if Pogba goes.
If Pogba stays then 4-3-3 with Pogba and Grealish as CM's. If Pogba goes, then 4-2-3-1 with Maddison as the AM. I personally prefer the 4-3-3 with Grealish.
That is a really good summation.For who? For a side like you? Grealish would be better suited as he's better on the ball and running with it and you are void of players in the midfield who will run with the ball and attack the space (Hi Boss). Maddison is someone that needs players around him that are good for him to have the time and space a bit more like Mata. He'd be quality sometimes but he'd have quite a few naff performances also. Right now you need Grealish more and I think he could go to more clubs and look just as good. With Maddison I think he needs specific sides to look as good as he is in this Leicester side.
You need to define what you consider "world class" otherwise you can wriggle out if it!Just wanted to be the only one on first page who will say neither will become world class in few years. Hi future bumper of this thread!