We kind of leave our selves short if he goes. That’s why other transfer windows still being open is a joke.
Jadon Sancho | Slippy G wants a loan | Ornstein says it isn't happening
- Thread starter Samid
- Start date
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik @Rood and Imran @Annihilate Now! start with the good news by celebrating Manchester United Women's emphatic FA Cup win over Spurs at Wembley and the future of manager Marc Skinner.
Then it's the bad news and the ever worsening form of our Men with losses to Arsenal and Palace.
Finally the main debate - ETH Out now or keep him until the end of the season - if not longer. Are you Team Nik or Team Imran?
- Status
Stick him in stiffs till January.
Everyone mentions Amad but isn't he out on a nasty injury and recovery ?
I would rather see Amad (when he's back) or Pellistri playing ahead of Sancho. Sancho has a lot of making up to do if he wants to stay at United but I see that silly statement he put out is still pinned on his twitter account so it's not looking good for him.
Not at all a bad idea. Given the time and the fact that we wont be able to replace him set a loan fee of 20-25m EUR. I would not mind 20-25m to help us strengthen further in Jan, but then those 20-25m might go as dividends to the Glazers
He will be back for January or around that.
Fair point but I doubt Ten Hag would pick him over Bruno, Pellistri or even Mount when he comes back.
Mount has played on the right before hasn’t he? We have four genuine options for the two midfield places, plus Hannibal, Mainoo Amad, Pellistri to cover for the first team.
He's hardly going to go to Saudi at this point in his career.
The obligations are usually conditional. Bailly went to Marseille with an obligation where the criteria was not met.
If they want to pay all his wages and give us a £35m loan fee which should cover Olise 
Sounds good to me.
Sounds good to me.
Neves left at 26.
What difference does it make? He's not going to play another game for us most likely. We have Pellistri and Amad (when he returns) to take his spot on the bench.
the most exciting thing to happen nowadays is some idiot wants to buy our dead-wood
Nobody can afford him/wants to take the risk.
So he should really consider it to be honest.
Who the feck is James Benge?
I think he only played on the left, but he tracks back as much as Antony and he can cross.
He was playing for Wolves and wasn't capable of earning crazy money in a traditional big league. Sancho could still get 200k+ a week from an established team at this point, someone will be willing to take a chance that he just doesn't suit us.
"Yeah, of course...."
What a load of shite!
Don't see how we benefit from a loan to Saudi. Hardly gonna increase his value.
A loan has no benefit and we’d be short of options on the right, plus all the uncertainly around Antony. Also feck helping slippy G in any way.
Last edited:
In fairness he may do well over there, and the Saudi's would be interested in buying him outright.
If he's seen as a problem in the dressing room or a challenge to the manager's authority, then this temporarily removes that issue. Especially if he's deemed as basically not going to play serious minutes for us in the meantime.
Agreed. A lot depends on the Anthony situation. The club will have a lot of information on that. If the chance of Anthony getting imprisoned between now and January 1 is high, then we should keep Sancho. If the chances are very low (even because of delays in processing time), then we can take a risk to loan out Sancho. We'll be better off long term if Sancho gets sold. He's not good enough to really make it here, and better to sell now while he still might have some market value.
How short we'd be on options really depends on a) what happens with the Antony situation, b) how willing ETH is to use Pellistri more regularly and c) how willing he is to use one of Bruno or Mount out wide if needed.
Can see Bruno out wide being the option he goes to. Solves the midfield issue and really Bruno is decent enough there with Pellestri covering.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Picking up (unless the source is the same)
feck off with the loan deal talk. Saudis have been throwing around money left and right on talents nowhere near sanchos potential. They want him they need to pay up.
Outcast.
I'm sorry Ms. Fletcher (oh), I am for real
Never meant to make your supporters cry
I apologize a trillion times.
I'm sorry Ms. Fletcher (oh), I am for real
Never meant to make your supporters cry
I apologize a trillion times.
Staying at United and never playing isn't going to increase it either.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
And more
Get rid, as long as there’s an obligation to buy
Snap their hand off.
As much as I would love for this to happen (with an obligation to buy), I would be absolutely floored if this got done.
Ornstein says No
He is doing us a favour
I still think of the SPL as the Scottish league. I was wondering how Rangers or Celtic were going to scrap the money together for Salah.
- Status