Gazza
Full Member
Sancho then?
Who?Sancho then?
Very delusional that you can't see the difference between Greenwood & Sancho. One is inside forward and his job is to cut inside and score, while the other one is a winger that offer creativity on width.
We have no quality to offer in the wide area, which is the point of signing winger is to fix that. Look at how easy Bayern score tap in goals because they got so much quality players to offer in the width area. If we have Sancho, we would have score and win the Sevilla game because he would have offer us different option to score, not just relying on through ball and our predictable chances were saved by Sevilla keeper.
Quality over quantity. We needed & wanted a centre back and we would have been in better option if we put on hold the DM position in 2017 by spending the money on Van Dijk instead. Same goes with Sancho, we need and want a winger, we can put other positions on hold.
3.85 billion.38.5 billion?
yeah lets go full mediocreSign Brooks and then spunk the rest on a LB and CB.
I don't think you understood what I said.
I'm not advocating against signing Sancho - I'm saying that IF we can't sign him, then Greenwood, regardless of where he'll end up playing, is already more effective as our third attacker than almost anyone (other than Sancho) we could sign would be, so looking at backup wingers wouldn't be the worst idea this summer (again, IF we can't get Sancho). It'd still add balance to the team and give us another option and more depth.
And we still weren't in for Van Dijk. Just because we spent money the summer he moved to Liverpool doesn't mean we directly chose to sign Matic & Lindelof over him.
It’s not happening is it? I honestly feel we may have dodged a bullet. I know I’m probably the minority in that thinking but I just feel he was a little overrated. Dortmund are being very unrealistic so would be happy not to give them the cash.
If this is dodging a bullet then what isn't?It’s not happening is it? I honestly feel we may have dodged a bullet. I know I’m probably the minority in that thinking but I just feel he was a little overrated. Dortmund are being very unrealistic so would be happy not to give them the cash.
The journey of a thousand pages, begins with one small speculation and thousands of muppets.Neil Custis has reported that we have approached Borussia Dortmund with a view to signing Jadon Sancho.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/8438783/man-utd-70m-dortmund-jadon-sancho-city-transfer/
Samuel Luckhurst has also reported that we tried to bring him to the club when he wanted out at City last year. He went on to say, we were even willing to wait past the summer window to sign him, but the player wanted out at City pronto, hence Borussia Dortmund signing him.
https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/man-utd-jadon-sancho-transfer-15832138
Why would he be worth much less he then still has 2 years of contract.Dortmund have played a hard game on this transfer and next year they risk losing him for much less.
Dortmund have played a hard game on this transfer and next year they risk losing him for much less.
Yes but their price is too much during these Coronavirus times and it seems that United are not too far away from their price.Eh, they had a price in mind that they always were going to stick by, a price that I feel is very reasonable for Sancho. It was always a case of pay it or get fecked
We've wasted almost the whole summer pursuing one player who it's looking very likely we won't be signing. You really can't make this up. We start our season in a week, the player is going to have almost no time to actually be incorporated into the team, if we even end up signing a fecking player, that is. All that talk before the summer about taking advantage of the market etc. and it's beginning to look like VDB might be our only transfer
Don’t give up yet! Remember how you got your taglineWe've wasted almost the whole summer pursuing one player who it's looking very likely we won't be signing. You really can't make this up. We start our season in a week, the player is going to have almost no time to actually be incorporated into the team, if we even end up signing a fecking player, that is. All that talk before the summer about taking advantage of the market etc. and it's beginning to look like VDB might be our only transfer
I read latest posts on this thread and get an impression that there is some news (mostly signaling bad) and all I find is a 2 word or a hyphenated one word tweet from Howard Nurse who appears to be not using Internet Explorer anymore.
Can someone ITK tell me if this is a done deal?
Describing missing out on Sancho as dodging a bullet is certainly a unique opinion, I'll give you that. Probably up there with Zaha being a good alternative, but we're all allowed our own views!
Woodward briefing the UK press that they got an agreement with the player A MONTH after the "deadline" and either never placing an official bid or forcing Sancho to make a transfer request that never happens will go down as one of the stupidest things this club has ever done. This would even be beyond the fellaini signing. How can you brief the press about a deal with the player and then nothing happens?
Yes but their price is too much during these Coronavirus times and it seems that United are not too far away from their price.
Don’t give up yet! Remember how you got your tagline
Get a grip and let the situation play out.
There wasn’t anyone who took that deadline seriously, Dortmund were chancing their arm, and aside from muppets on the Caf everyone realised how ridiculous it was.
Can someone ITK tell me if this is a done deal?
Get a grip and let the situation play out.
There wasn’t anyone who took that deadline seriously, Dortmund were chancing their arm, and aside from muppets on the Caf everyone realised how ridiculous it was.
That may be the case, but there does come a time when selling your best and most important player does become unreasonable. Their season is beginning, no team wants to go into their season without knowing whether or not they are going to have their best player for one and two, with constant transfer rumours and speculation potentially unsettling them/the club etc.
Which is why I see a solution happening very soon, either we walk, or we fold and pay what they want
Journalists get asked questions on Twitter. Their response isn't an article. If you want journalism, don't go to Twitter for it."journalism" in 2020.
Literally any buffoon can be one now. Don't let facts or legit sources get in the way.
I think the deadline is meaningless.
What i'm saying is, if you brief your press about "progressing the deal" a month after the other club makes a public statement about a deadline (as fake as it likely is), then NOTHING happens for the rest of the window (no official bid, no move by sancho), then what was the point of the brief?
They will create a bidding war next summer with clubs back on the market post Covid so this will definitely not be the case. If Sancho manages to have another season like his last couple of seasons have been his value will only increase. Him having three years left instead of two changed everything. Dortmund have played this like Sanchez played the grand piano.Dortmund have played a hard game on this transfer and next year they risk losing him for much less.
Can someone ITK tell me if this is a done deal?