youngrell
Full Member
The added time was ridiculous. The clock already turned 120 during the break for the winner.
It wasn’t a foul though? Bruno needs to be stronger there imo. Fernandes perhaps lucky he didn’t get a second yellow for the tackle on Scob…….genuinely a shit ref though. The extra time added on at the end is actually worthy of investigationScouse cnut can feck off. Who was the linesman that didn't call the foul on Bruno for that Liverpool goal?
It was a foul. If it wasn't fernandes you wouldn't even be arguing it. He comes through him at full speed to win the ball and clatters his hip and his leg. A very simple foul, which people are ignoring because Bruno is so unpopular among our own and non United fansIt wasn’t a foul though? Bruno needs to be stronger there imo. Fernandes perhaps lucky he didn’t get a second yellow for the tackle on Scob…….genuinely a shit ref though. The extra time added on at the end is actually worthy of investigation
Thought it was a clear foul to be honest.It wasn’t a foul though? Bruno needs to be stronger there imo. Fernandes perhaps lucky he didn’t get a second yellow for the tackle on Scob…….genuinely a shit ref though. The extra time added on at the end is actually worthy of investigation
Gomez gets the ball first, Bruno is waiting for the contact. If we had a goal disallowed for that I can imagine what would be on here about the ref.Thought it was a clear foul to be honest.
He had a 16 stone lump put all his weight through his back. He’s a football player not a power lifter.It wasn’t a foul though? Bruno needs to be stronger there imo. Fernandes perhaps lucky he didn’t get a second yellow for the tackle on Scob…….genuinely a shit ref though. The extra time added on at the end is actually worthy of investigation
I’m a big fan of Bruno tbh, doesn’t mean I can’t believe he should do better there and be stronger. I think last season he got the free kick against Arsenal and the goal was disallowed and the PGMOL came out to say it should have stood. Onana shouldn’t have been playing it short to AWB there, and at that stage of the game, to start it all offIt was a foul. If it wasn't fernandes you wouldn't even be arguing it. He comes through him at full speed to win the ball and clatters his hip and his leg. A very simple foul, which people are ignoring because Bruno is so unpopular among our own and non United fans
*12 stoneHe had a 16 stone lump put all his weight through his back. He’s a football player not a power lifter.
No chance, he’s a 6 foot 2 shit house*12 stone
Its a foul. It's that simpleI’m a big fan of Bruno tbh, doesn’t mean I can’t believe he should do better there and be stronger. I think last season he got the free kick against Arsenal and the goal was disallowed and the PGMOL came out to say it should have stood. Onana shouldn’t have been playing it short to AWB there, and at that stage of the game, to start it all off
100% chance, he weighs 77kg. Google itNo chance, he’s a 6 foot 2 shit house
You do realise those Google weight reports are nonsense? There is no official public record of any player’s weight.100% chance, he weighs 77kg. Google it
exactly, i thought he was going to blow as we countered.The added time was ridiculous. The clock already turned 120 during the break for the winner.
"Be stronger"I’m a big fan of Bruno tbh, doesn’t mean I can’t believe he should do better there and be stronger. I think last season he got the free kick against Arsenal and the goal was disallowed and the PGMOL came out to say it should have stood. Onana shouldn’t have been playing it short to AWB there, and at that stage of the game, to start it all off
5 minutes extra time from 15 minutes of football. Wouldn't we be getting 15 minutes extra at the end of regular halves of football with that logic?Added time in extra time was a genuine piss take. Horrible cnut.
4 minutes after a 45 minute second half. and he manages to add 4-5 after a 15 minute half.5 minutes extra time from 15 minutes of football. Wouldn't we be getting 15 minutes extra at the end of regular halves of football with that logic?
I bet you could comb through the entirety of that second half of extra time and not find even 3 minutes of injury time. I might just do it.
No he doesn't. Just rewatched it, he goes through Brunos thigh to get to the ball.Gomez gets the ball first, Bruno is waiting for the contact. If we had a goal disallowed for that I can imagine what would be on here about the ref.
I think it was Mac Allister, who was already on a yellow, on Harry. I couldn't believe that call.The one where I think it was Diaz went in high studs on Harry, I was waiting for a red and then he gives Liverpool a free kick . 4 mins extra time too was mad, crap ref.
2(?) of the 4 minutes went to celebrate the last goal? Rashford scored another one, Kelleher got a yellow for timewasting, every throw in took forever and Liverpool also made a sub. Yet people call for investigation.Adding on an extra 4 minutes stoppage time for a goal scored in the 120th minute was a fecking disgrace. If Amad puts that shot wide he 100% blows the FT whistle immediately afterwards. I'm not one for conspiracy theories but it did feel like he wanted Liverpool to win that game, as has been the case for most of the officiating in their games ever since the Diaz offside mistake vs Spurs in September.
The goal was scored in the 121st minute wasn't it? So why do you need to factor in the 2 minutes celebration into stoppage time? If Amad puts the shot wide then the full time whistle is blown, but because he scores then that warrants more additional time? It makes no sense.2(?) of the 4 minutes went to celebrate the last goal? Rashford scored another one, Kelleher got a yellow for timewasting, every throw in took forever and Liverpool also made a sub. Yet people call for investigation.
Most people are not "the one" for conspiracy theories but at the same time there is plenty of conspiracies going on, even for stuff that can be broken down in seconds.
Feelings trump objectivity and usually the eyes just see what the brain wants them to see.
John Brookes did his bit trying to help Liverpool win today and failed2(?) of the 4 minutes went to celebrate the last goal? Rashford scored another one, Kelleher got a yellow for timewasting, every throw in took forever and Liverpool also made a sub. Yet people call for investigation.
Most people are not "the one" for conspiracy theories but at the same time there is plenty of conspiracies going on, even for stuff that can be broken down in seconds.
Feelings trump objectivity and usually the eyes just see what the brain wants them to see.
A guy just broke it down in the VAR and refs-thread. Goal scored 120:07.The goal was scored in the 121st minute wasn't it? So why do you need to factor in the 2 minutes celebration into stoppage time? If Amad puts the shot wide then the full time whistle is blown, but because he scores then that warrants more additional time? It makes no sense.
Hopefully he will try even better next time around! Congrats on the win!John Brookes did his bit trying to help Liverpool win today and failed
So the Gomez and Mac Allistair ones were perfectly normal decisions to you?Didn't think he did much wrong.
Second Liverpool goal was annoying. It wasn't a foul but it's one the linesman gives literally 99% of the time. If you don't give it once then don't give it for anyone and there isn't a problem. That's on the linesman though not the ref. If you repeatedly give those as fouls to the defending team as they nearly always do, players are entitled to fall over and expect one, and it looks like bias when you randomly choose to ignore one in every 100
Ref could have sent Bruno off. There wasn't really any controversial decision to make otherwise, luckily