Keir Starmer Labour Leader

africanspur

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
9,154
Supports
Tottenham Hotspur
I mean Boris , Gove, Mogg, Patel, Hancock or any of them could have come out with this garbage. Why doesn't he just cross the floor and join his Tory chums?

Sir Keir Starmer: UK's best years lie ahead

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-55485874
Sometimes I think people on here want politicians to speak exactly like they would amongst their friends.

Starmer: The UK's best years are behind it. We're a racist shithole and nobody would ever want to move here. We may as well just give up. Brexit will be a disaster but it will be a moot point anyway because climate change is coming to engulf us all in a fiery ball of death.

What exactly do you want him to say?
 

Oldyella

Full Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
5,858
I think Starmer is doing a fantastic job. I watch PMQs every week and he has Boris scrabbling about and bluffing. His position on Corbyn (who I also admired) is spot on, Corbyn should just apologise and move on.

My worry is that many in Labour want to be right, rather than win. If the party unite on the common goal of removing the Tories from power and back Starmer, they can win the next election.
But Johnson just gets away with it,and is never called out for all the bluffing and lying. And sadly not many watch PMQs.
 

nickm

Full Member
Joined
May 20, 2001
Messages
9,176
I really can't understand why Labour whipped their MPs to vote for it? No matter what, it was going to pass so Labour could have abstained and let it pass.
Because governments in waiting have to show voters they will take a clear position on crucial matters of the national interest, eg international treaties. He's not leading a pressure group or gaggle of activists here.

He's also showing that labour accepts the issue is now fundamentally settled.
 
Last edited:

Compton22

Knows that he knows nothing.
Joined
Jul 27, 2014
Messages
3,392
I mean Boris , Gove, Mogg, Patel, Hancock or any of them could have come out with this garbage. Why doesn't he just cross the floor and join his Tory chums?

Sir Keir Starmer: UK's best years lie ahead

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-55485874
Yeah, in a year like 2020, let's heap on more doom and gloom on the British people by saying how everything is going to be just as terrible if not worse next year :lol:
 

Sweet Square

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
23,708
Location
The Zone
Not sure what this means, but since I read it my dog has been going apeshit.
Yep or the guy is just pig shit thick.

The only correct answer is all tories all vermin but at the very least pick some old cnut like John Major or Ken Clarke, don't pick the tory who recently deported black British citizens and was part of the the last decade of tory austerity.
 

NinjaFletch

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
19,818
Yep or the guy is just pig shit thick.

The only correct answer is all tories all vermin but at the very least pick some old cnut like John Major or Ken Clarke, don't pick the tory who recently deported black British citizens and was part of the the last decade of tory austerity.
It seems weird to level that accusation at a QC, but I was thinking this yesterday.

The precise problem with May is we saw very clearly exactly what 'moral framework' she possessed and it is absolutely abhorrent.

It's weird how a couple of years being an utterly useless PM has rendered her decade being a cnut in the home office irrelevant in the public memory.
 

Kag

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2013
Messages
18,875
Location
United Kingdom
Because governments in waiting have to show voters they will take a clear position on crucial matters of the national interest, eg international treaties. He's not leading a pressure group or gaggle of activists here.

He's also showing that labour accepts the issue is now fundamentally settled.
Anyone with a few brain cells can see that this is the case. Starmer actually wants to be elected, not just be the leader of the biggest protest party in Europe.
 

NinjaFletch

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
19,818
Anyone with a few brain cells can see that this is the case. Starmer actually wants to be elected, not just be the leader of the biggest protest party in Europe.
I think it's a really interesting point of view to think that Labour's path to power is made easier taking flak from the Tories ('see, it was such a good deal even Labour voted for it' or 'well it wasn't our fault it was such a bad deal, even Labour voted for it') or from the Lib Dems, the SNP, the Greens for backing the deal.

And by interesting I mean slightly insane.
 

ZupZup

Full Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
2,401
Location
W3104
Anyone with a few brain cells can see that this is the case. Starmer actually wants to be elected, not just be the leader of the biggest protest party in Europe.
The opposition party always wants to be elected. There are some voters who want to support a party that offers genuinely transformative policies. If Starmer is elected to be Tory Lite... what’s the point?
 

Mart1974

harbours delusions of insignificance
Joined
Nov 13, 2013
Messages
3,508
But Johnson just gets away with it,and is never called out for all the bluffing and lying. And sadly not many watch PMQs.
This will come across as elitist and I am not, but I worry that the average voter will not pick up on the nuances in the PMQ debates so like you I am concerned that Bozo is getting away with it.
 

Sweet Square

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
23,708
Location
The Zone
It's weird how a couple of years being an utterly useless PM has rendered her decade being a cnut in the home office irrelevant in the public memory.
Yeah I remember friends telling me how they felt sorry for her(Had to keep reminding them what a god awful arsehole she was). She was so shit people started to sympathise with her.

Very bizarre.
 
Last edited:

nickm

Full Member
Joined
May 20, 2001
Messages
9,176
I think it's a really interesting point of view to think that Labour's path to power is made easier taking flak from the Tories ('see, it was such a good deal even Labour voted for it' or 'well it wasn't our fault it was such a bad deal, even Labour voted for it') or from the Lib Dems, the SNP, the Greens for backing the deal.

And by interesting I mean slightly insane.
they’ll take flak from the tories whatever they do.
 

nickm

Full Member
Joined
May 20, 2001
Messages
9,176
The opposition party always wants to be elected. There are some voters who want to support a party that offers genuinely transformative policies. If Starmer is elected to be Tory Lite... what’s the point?
They can go join socialist worker. Seriously. Plenty of places for people who want those kinds of policies. Don’t understand why labour, who can do plenty of good short of declaring a socialist revolution, has to continually cripple its chances of being elected to accommodate these people.
 

ZupZup

Full Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
2,401
Location
W3104
They can go join socialist worker. Seriously. Plenty of places for people who want those kinds of policies. Don’t understand why labour, who can do plenty of good short of declaring a socialist revolution, has to continually cripple its chances of being elected to accommodate these people.
How about those in the party who want to be Tory Lite actually just join the Tories instead? Then Labour can concentrate an providing an actual alternative without the self sabotage we’ve all become accustomed to.
 

finneh

Full Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
7,318
If there were an election in 2021 between Starmer and Johnson I'd vote for the former.

Given that I'd have voted for the monster raving loony party over the previous regime that's quite the turnaround.

If he promises tax cuts and more vehemently criticises governmental waste and cronyism I'll be a fully paid up member. Especially since the Tories have moved far to the left economically and further to the right liberally (both of which are disturbing in my view).
 

Smores

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
25,548
Anyone with a few brain cells can see that this is the case. Starmer actually wants to be elected, not just be the leader of the biggest protest party in Europe.
We pretty much had the same posts not so long ago defending all of Starmers abstentions on this basis :lol:

Have you lot suddenly forgot the not so distant abstentions and the defence of them?
 
Last edited:

NinjaFletch

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
19,818
If there were an election in 2021 between Starmer and Johnson I'd vote for the former.

Given that I'd have voted for the monster raving loony party over the previous regime that's quite the turnaround.

If he promises tax cuts and more vehemently criticises governmental waste and cronyism I'll be a fully paid up member. Especially since the Tories have moved far to the left economically and further to the right liberally (both of which are disturbing in my view).
And which rather neatly demonstrates to all the centrists why people are worried by the direction the party is going when one of the most openly right wing posters on the site thinks that Labour might be a political home for him.
 

finneh

Full Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
7,318
And which rather neatly demonstrates to all the centrists why people are worried by the direction the party is going when one of the most openly right wing posters on the site thinks that Labour might be a political home for him.
If it makes you feel any better it would be the lesser of two evils, rather than a political home.

I'd take the cost of the UK being slightly more left economically if it moved far closer to the centre liberally. Priti Patel and Matt Hancock scare the shit out of me.
 

Kag

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2013
Messages
18,875
Location
United Kingdom
I think it's a really interesting point of view to think that Labour's path to power is made easier taking flak from the Tories ('see, it was such a good deal even Labour voted for it' or 'well it wasn't our fault it was such a bad deal, even Labour voted for it') or from the Lib Dems, the SNP, the Greens for backing the deal.

And by interesting I mean slightly insane.
Labour respond by saying that they voted to ensure that the will of the people was acted upon after years of division and make a point of highlighting the (avoidable - this bit is key) incompetence that follows. By doing this they will begin to pick up votes in places where they were lost. There was nothing to be gained by continuing to sit on the fence, or continuing to alienate those who voted for Brexit (and have since avoided Labour like the plague).

The opposition party always wants to be elected. There are some voters who want to support a party that offers genuinely transformative policies. If Starmer is elected to be Tory Lite... what’s the point?
Wanting to be elected and actually being elected are two very different things. Labour can’t just appeal to the people who idolised Corbyn and Starmer knows this.
 

Kag

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2013
Messages
18,875
Location
United Kingdom
We pretty much had the same posts not so long ago defending all of Starmers abstentions on this basis :lol:

Have you lot suddenly forgot the not so distant abstentions and the defence of them?
The general public don’t give a monkeys about your run-of-the-mill voting in parliament. But they buy into one-liners: Corbyn is an anti-Semite; Labour bankrupt the country; Labour delayed Brexit.

How true any of that is doesn’t matter; it sticks.

Labour would do well to fight the next election on issues such as the economy, national security and public services. They will have a field day.
 

ZupZup

Full Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
2,401
Location
W3104
Wanting to be elected and actually being elected are two very different things. Labour can’t just appeal to the people who idolised Corbyn and Starmer knows this.
The problem is, he is not appealing to them even a tiny bit. He could have tried to be the unity candidate he pledged to be, but he isn’t. The reality is, he had to be entirely unprincipled and dishonest to become Labour leader.

He’s gambling that he can get enough right wing votes to see himself elected without losing too many on the left. When it comes to the crunch, I am not convinced this strategy will pay off.
 

Foxbatt

New Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
14,297
Labour respond by saying that they voted to ensure that the will of the people was acted upon after years of division and make a point of highlighting the (avoidable - this bit is key) incompetence that follows. By doing this they will begin to pick up votes in places where they were lost. There was nothing to be gained by continuing to sit on the fence, or continuing to alienate those who voted for Brexit (and have since avoided Labour like the plague).



Wanting to be elected and actually being elected are two very different things. Labour can’t just appeal to the people who idolised Corbyn and Starmer knows this.
They were not voting to uphold the will of the people. That has been done long time ago. They were voting for a horrible deal that the Tories cooked up. Labour could have said it's a bad deal and we will have nothing to do with it. It's going to pass no matter how they voted.
Now when everything goes belly up Tories will say you supported and voted for it too. And rightly so.
 

sun_tzu

The Art of Bore
Joined
Aug 23, 2010
Messages
19,536
Location
Still waiting for the Youthquake
finneh and sun are going to replace all the volunteer canvassers and campaigners come 2024.
Well they got such a fan feking tastic result last time didn't they?

A bit more effort with the media and being portrayed as even vaguely competent probably slightly higher on the priority list than knocking on more doors I think?
 
Last edited:

Kag

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2013
Messages
18,875
Location
United Kingdom
They were not voting to uphold the will of the people. That has been done long time ago. They were voting for a horrible deal that the Tories cooked up. Labour could have said it's a bad deal and we will have nothing to do with it. It's going to pass no matter how they voted.
Now when everything goes belly up Tories will say you supported and voted for it too. And rightly so.
I think it’s a matter of perception; part of a longer term goal of bringing back former voters into the fold, particularity those who are older and socially more conservative. Time will tell as to whether it pays off.

I also don’t think things will go “belly up” either. I mean, it already has. But it won’t be pinned down to issues with Brexit. I’m willing to be wrong but I don’t think your average punter will notice much of a difference. The pandemic recovery is what will determine votes in the future and this is where Labour can be stronger.
 

nickm

Full Member
Joined
May 20, 2001
Messages
9,176
They were not voting to uphold the will of the people. That has been done long time ago. They were voting for a horrible deal that the Tories cooked up. Labour could have said it's a bad deal and we will have nothing to do with it. It's going to pass no matter how they voted.
Now when everything goes belly up Tories will say you supported and voted for it too. And rightly so.
Labour supported the UK joining the ERM but the tories got the blame when it went tits up, to labours great benefit, because it was the governments policy. If brexit goes bad, people will blame the tories, because they unlike labour, are the government, and they are identified with brexit. People simply will not care about how the opposition voted if there’s a government in crisis. Amazed this even needs to be said to be honest.
 

Fluctuation0161

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2016
Messages
8,165
Location
Manchester
It's not a divided labour if they are kicked out of labour... they are just some irrelavant fringe group... if anything I think having that lot and corbyn out will make labour much more electable
Removing the democratic and socialist elements that make up the core of Labours ethos will do quite the opposite. The strategy of divide and conquer will have the Tories rubbing their hands together.

You are informed by the likes of Guido, who would love to see the split and subsequent collapse of Labour. Unfortunately, alot like the hard-core Brexiters, you just can't see it.
 

Fluctuation0161

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2016
Messages
8,165
Location
Manchester
I mean Boris , Gove, Mogg, Patel, Hancock or any of them could have come out with this garbage. Why doesn't he just cross the floor and join his Tory chums?

Sir Keir Starmer: UK's best years lie ahead

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-55485874
Forensic opposition there.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/dec/31/labour-vote-tory-brexit-keir-starmer-deal?

Labour's vote for Johnson's deal is not the end of its Brexit problems

Keir Starmer argues that voters want Brexit resolved. But supporting this deal won’t make his party’s sore spot go away
 

Fluctuation0161

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2016
Messages
8,165
Location
Manchester
I think Starmer is doing a fantastic job. I watch PMQs every week and he has Boris scrabbling about and bluffing. His position on Corbyn (who I also admired) is spot on, Corbyn should just apologise and move on.

My worry is that many in Labour want to be right, rather than win. If the party unite on the common goal of removing the Tories from power and back Starmer, they can win the next election.
A tiny proportion of voters watch PMQs. If that is your basis for expecting a Labour win at the next election then you need to have a look at Scotland, for a start.
 

MoskvaRed

Full Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2013
Messages
5,232
Location
Not Moskva
An open question to which I don’t pretend to know the answer - how does Starmer construct a majority or at least a coalition? Bearing in mind the following factors: Scotland is unlikely to return to the Labour fold, the price of SNP support would be indy referendum 2 and the Lib Dems have almost vanished from the electoral map.

I can point out certain things Starmer shouldn’t do (announce major policies on the hoof, allow your opponents opportunities to denounce you as unpatriotic) but, whether you think he is doing a good job or not (I’m personally underwhelmed), what should his strategy be in order to gain power?
 

Fluctuation0161

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2016
Messages
8,165
Location
Manchester
Wanting to be elected and actually being elected are two very different things. Labour can’t just appeal to the people who idolised Corbyn and Starmer knows this.
Hmmmm.

Anyone with a few brain cells can see that this is the case. Starmer actually wants to be elected, not just be the leader of the biggest protest party in Europe.
 
Last edited:

Don't Kill Bill

Full Member
Joined
May 14, 2006
Messages
5,674
An open question to which I don’t pretend to know the answer - how does Starmer construct a majority or at least a coalition? Bearing in mind the following factors: Scotland is unlikely to return to the Labour fold, the price of SNP support would be indy referendum 2 and the Lib Dems have almost vanished from the electoral map.

I can point out certain things Starmer shouldn’t do (announce major policies on the hoof, allow your opponents opportunities to denounce you as unpatriotic) but, whether you think he is doing a good job or not (I’m personally underwhelmed), what should his strategy be in order to gain power?
The general rule is that oppositions don't win elections govts lose them.

I would put up 3 main policies which the Tories can't nick for ideological reasons like council house building programs for the working poor. Then just bang on and on about them for the next three years. All other policies are in revue but will have them clearly stated in the manifesto before the next election. Then get personal about Johnson. Keep asking him how many children he has at question time. It is time to be as obnoxious about him as his party is about Labour leaders. It can't be hard to make him look like an immoral and utter useless cnut because that is just what he is.

Above all else talk nice about the north and outbid the Tories on the promises to level up. The country will most likely be paying the covid bill and it will be hurting and willing to hold a grudge against the govt who was on watch and messed it all up.
 

711

Verified Bird Expert
Scout
Joined
Dec 10, 2007
Messages
24,275
Location
Don't sign old players and cast offs
Oppositions might have their work cut out to win elections, but they can very easily lose them.

You make a good point about Boris 'leveling up'. I'm sure he'll do stuff, but the amounts he spends will fall pitifully short of what would be really needed. Every few million chucked at transport should be used to highlight how unequal spending actually is, the same with health spending and so on. I look forward to a series of own goals on that policy.
 

Buster15

Go on Didier
Joined
Aug 28, 2018
Messages
13,512
Location
Bristol
Supports
Bristol Rovers
Oppositions might have their work cut out to win elections, but they can very easily lose them.

You make a good point about Boris 'leveling up'. I'm sure he'll do stuff, but the amounts he spends will fall pitifully short of what would be really needed. Every few million chucked at transport should be used to highlight how unequal spending actually is, the same with health spending and so on. I look forward to a series of own goals on that policy.
Have to say that I am not a fan of levelling up the so called north. Levelling up should be a natural process and not one artificially promoted by politics.
But what Starmer must do is to focus much effort on winning back those traditional Labour voters by demonstrating that Labour values them and will never again take their votes for granted.
 

711

Verified Bird Expert
Scout
Joined
Dec 10, 2007
Messages
24,275
Location
Don't sign old players and cast offs
Have to say that I am not a fan of levelling up the so called north. Levelling up should be a natural process and not one artificially promoted by politics.
But what Starmer must do is to focus much effort on winning back those traditional Labour voters by demonstrating that Labour values them and will never again take their votes for granted.
What some of us mean by levelling up is simply spending somewhere near the same amount per head on things like transport and health provision. I am a fan of that for sure. Boris won't get anywhere near that though, he will think a few quid here and there will be enough, and it will be right to highlight that.