Kepa Arrizabalaga

Keeps It tidy

Hates Messi
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
17,638
Location
New York
I can't remember if it was Butland or Pickford that the media were saying Chelsea were interested in before they signed Kepa but no ones going to convince me they'd be worse off with either of them
They would have not have been able to get Butland that late in the window and he would not be an improvement on Kepa in anyway. And with the club Pickford plays for that is an obvious no go.
 

Keeps It tidy

Hates Messi
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
17,638
Location
New York
Chelsea didn't have to buy him? Your points have been aspects of football for decades now. If a player isn't worth 70m then don't spend 70m on him.
Its not that complicated.
Maybe Chelsea will have 3 loan players in their first 11 next year then fans will realise why fees still matter.
They just bought Pulisic. The Kepa deal is not making it hard for them to spend.
 

RochaRoja

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2018
Messages
1,567
Chelsea didn't have to buy him? Your points have been aspects of football for decades now. If a player isn't worth 70m then don't spend 70m on him.
Its not that complicated.
Maybe Chelsea will have 3 loan players in their first 11 next year then fans will realise why fees still matter.
£70m isn’t even that much money anymore. What else were they supposed to do? Play Rob Green until they could sign someone of a similar level for cheaper?

Kepa’s a young keeper, capped by an elite national team, and played for a club that has a strict policy of only picking local players making him of high value to them. Everyone also knew that Chelsea would be desperate for a goalie and had plenty of money in the bank following the Courtois sale. Pickford would have cost them a similar amount and he’s useless.
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,758
£70m isn’t even that much money anymore. What else were they supposed to do? Play Rob Green until they could sign someone of a similar level for cheaper?

Kepa’s a young keeper, capped by an elite national team, and played for a club that has a strict policy of only picking local players making him of high value to them. Everyone also knew that Chelsea would be desperate for a goalie and had plenty of money in the bank following the Courtois sale. Pickford would have cost them a similar amount and he’s useless.
70 million is a shit loads of money for a GK, especially for the one who is far from the best in the world. It's a record breaking transfer for a GK.

Chelsea could have planned better, not sure why it's always ignored. There are many more GKs than just Kepa, Butland, Pickford. Courtois said he informed Chelsea that he wants to leave and he told them before world cup. So it was obvious he would push for transfer. Chelsea could have planned their transfers better instead of letting it to go till last min.

Anyways I'm not saying he is bad GK, he obviously is good enough keeper but saying it isn't much money or Chelsea had no option is just wrong.
 

Adisa

likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Messages
50,400
Location
Birmingham
Too early to start debating his training after fee. Has many years to prove himself.
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
£70m isn’t even that much money anymore. What else were they supposed to do? Play Rob Green until they could sign someone of a similar level for cheaper?

Kepa’s a young keeper, capped by an elite national team, and played for a club that has a strict policy of only picking local players making him of high value to them. Everyone also knew that Chelsea would be desperate for a goalie and had plenty of money in the bank following the Courtois sale. Pickford would have cost them a similar amount and he’s useless.
There's a middle ground from overspending 70m on a keeper and playing Rob Green.
Again, you're under the assumption that Chelsea had to buy Kepa regardless of the cost. Madrid were set to sign him and walked away, why were Chelseas hands tied?
 

RochaRoja

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2018
Messages
1,567
There's a middle ground from overspending 70m on a keeper and playing Rob Green.
Again, you're under the assumption that Chelsea had to buy Kepa regardless of the cost. Madrid were set to sign him and walked away, why were Chelseas hands tied?
Who else could they have signed? Genuine question.
 

pcaming

United are an embarrassment.
Joined
Jun 9, 2013
Messages
2,967
Location
Trinidad & Tobago
The market has changed, and Chelsea were in a bind. Besides we all watched DDG struggle early on, i'd say Kepa has come into the league and settled better than DDG did.
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,492
Who else could they have signed? Genuine question.
Alison, Alex Meret, Perin, Im sure the list could go on.

Btw Kepa is on a 10 year contract and 180k a week. He is Chelsea second top earner after Hazard on 200k.

Chelsea got bent over on this deal
 

RochaRoja

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2018
Messages
1,567
Alison, Alex Meret, Perin, Im sure the list could go on.

Btw Kepa is on a 10 year contract and 180k a week. He is Chelsea second top earner after Hazard on 200k.

Chelsea got bent over on this deal
Kepa was barely any more expensive than Alisson who had already joined Liverpool at that point and it had been known his transfer was a done deal by April last year.

Are you just picking names out of a hat? If Juve’s reserve goalie is considered one of the better options then you’ve pretty much answered why they had to pay big for Kepa.
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,492
Kepa was barely any more expensive than Alisson who had already joined Liverpool at that point and it had been known his transfer was a done deal by April last year.

Are you just picking names out of a hat? If Juve’s reserve goalie is considered one of the better options then you’ve pretty much answered why they had to pay big for Kepa.
No I am picking names that were available when Chelsea knew Tibo was leaving which was way before the season ended. Alison was available then and isnt on a 10 year contract of 180k a week.

I also said and plenty others, the reason they had to pay over the odds is because they left it till the last moment to do a deal. Probably wasnt helped by the manager situation.
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,651
Location
London
Just remember De Gea in his initial seasons at Utd.
Which initial seasons? On the second one he was in PFA team of the year, on the third one he was the reason why we didn't finish in the second half of the table, and since then has been in EPL team of the year every season.

The myth that De Gea struggled for seasons is a myth. He struggled until January of his first season here, and since then has been the best keeper in the league (and best in the world in the last two seasons).
 

breakout67

Full Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2017
Messages
9,050
Supports
Man City
Which initial seasons? On the second one he was in PFA team of the year, on the third one he was the reason why we didn't finish in the second half of the table, and since then has been in EPL team of the year every season.

The myth that De Gea struggled for seasons is a myth. He struggled until January of his first season here, and since then has been the best keeper in the league (and best in the world in the last two seasons).
He dropped a few clangers so smart arses will now pick and choose when he was good to suit their opinion. De Gea was already showing signs of being a worldie in his first season.

The moment I saw him make this save I was confident he would come good.


One of the best free kicks Mata's taken in his career, De Gea on the other hand has made many saves better than that in my opinion.
 

AltiUn

likes playing with swords after fantasies
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
23,642
That might be the most disrespectful, cuntiest thing I've seen a player do, the cheek of him :lol:
 

ha_rooney

Correctly predicted France to win World Cup 2018
Joined
Dec 13, 2008
Messages
38,842
He must be confident Sarri is not going to last very long. cnut thing to do.
 

Irish Jet

New Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2012
Messages
2,261
Supports
Anyone but Rashford
Should have his contract terminated. Prick.
 

haram

New Member
Joined
May 28, 2017
Messages
12,921
Yet people think the Chelsea players actually do what the manager asks of them.
 

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
31,671
It's definately wrong to fight the substitution from Kepa.

Just to play devil's advocate though, is it still as disrespectful as Sky are claiming if Kepa is just trying to say he's fully fit and not to worry? As in, Kepa knows he's fit enough to play pens more than Sarri. It's not like Sarri taking Kepa off is a tactical move so undermining him on this case may not be as bad as claimed?

I don't know I just find Sky way too over the top these days when commentating.
 

SirAF

Ageist
Joined
Sep 28, 2003
Messages
37,637
Location
It's definately wrong to fight the substitution from Kepa.

Just to play devil's advocate though, is it still as disrespectful as Sky are claiming if Kepa is just trying to say he's fully fit and not to worry? As in, Kepa knows he's fit enough to play pens more than Sarri. It's not like Sarri taking Kepa off is a tactical move so undermining him on this case may not be as bad as claimed?

I don't know I just find Sky way too over the top these days when commentating.
But it could be a tactical move! Caballero is a strong keeper on penalties AND he knows the City players - it’s a pretty obvious sub to be fair.
 

breakout67

Full Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2017
Messages
9,050
Supports
Man City
It's definately wrong to fight the substitution from Kepa.

Just to play devil's advocate though, is it still as disrespectful as Sky are claiming if Kepa is just trying to say he's fully fit and not to worry? As in, Kepa knows he's fit enough to play pens more than Sarri. It's not like Sarri taking Kepa off is a tactical move so undermining him on this case may not be as bad as claimed?

I don't know I just find Sky way too over the top these days when commentating.
Chelsea have Caballero don't they? He is a penalty specialist and one of the best in the world at them.