Television Leaving Neverland....Harrowing Michael Jackson Documentary

[Rhyme Animal]

I'm not sure. There are a-sexual people, and Jackson in many ways appeared very a-sexual.

At the end of the day, none of us knew him. But I'm just saying, he was a weird guy. It's possible he was a-sexual.

 

[Brwned]

I'm not sure. There are a-sexual people, and Jackson in many ways appeared very a-sexual.

At the end of the day, none of us knew him. But I'm just saying, he was a weird guy. It's possible he was a-sexual.

An a-sexual person who really liked porn?

I've no idea how it works but that doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me.

 

[Spoony]

He probably was not not a nonce. Definitely.

 

[Redlambs]

He probably was not not a nonce. Definitely.

It's noncesense.

 

[RochaRoja]

An a-sexual person who really liked porn?

I've no idea how it works but that doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me.

Wouldn’t a guy whose sexual preferences were supposedly young boys being really into run of the mill heterosexual porn also seem kind of odd?

 

[youngrell]

Wouldn’t a guy whose sexual preferences were supposedly young boys being really into run of the mill heterosexual porn also seem kind of odd?

Not if he's using it to arouse said young boys.

 

[lsd]

There can't honestly be anyone who doesn't believe the guy was a pedophile

 

[Brwned]

Wouldn’t a guy whose sexual preferences were supposedly young boys being really into run of the mill heterosexual porn also seem kind of odd?

I know very little about the porn habits of normal people, never mind asexual folks and paedophiles. I would assume that paedophiles are more likely to look at normal porn, on top of the other stuff, than asexual folk. But I really wouldn't have a clue.

What we know conclusively is that he had a lot of porn in more places than most normal folks, and he brought lots of kids into those same places. So whatever the case, his willingness to have porn around kids is not something I would count in his favour. That's just me though.

 

[Wibble]

I know very little about the porn habits of normal people, never mind asexual folks and paedophiles. I would assume that paedophiles are more likely to look at normal porn, on top of the other stuff, than asexual folk. But I really wouldn't have a clue.

What we know conclusively is that he had a lot of porn in more places than most normal folks, and he brought lots of kids into those same places. So whatever the case, his willingness to have porn around kids is not something I would count in his favour. That's just me though.

If it hadn't been a case in the US involving a celebrity and race (witness the OJ Simpson debacle) he would have been in prison a long time ago.

 

[Revaulx]

What we know conclusively is that he had a lot of porn in more places than most normal folks, and he brought lots of kids into those same places. So whatever the case, his willingness to have porn around kids is not something I would count in his favour. That's just me though.

You can rest assured that it isn’t just you.

 

[Loublaze]

Their story has had inconsistencies and lies since the start though. The admission from Dan Reed is big.

Glaring inconsistencies.

 

[Ish]

Glaring inconsistencies.

What were the inconsistencies Lou?

 

[RochaRoja]

Remember when Safechuck said that Jackson abused him in New York after he performed at the 1989 Grammy Awards, but then it turned out that Jackson didn’t perform at the 1989 Grammys and they were held in LA, not NYC? And the Grammy Awards it seemed like he was actually referring to happened a full four months before the first incidence of alleged abuse took place? That was pretty weird.

 

[GifLord]

If it hadn't been a case in the US involving a celebrity and race (witness the OJ Simpson debacle) he would have been in prison a long time ago.

Are you trolling?
Sneddon the prosecutor literally tampered with evidence just to make him look guilty. No wonder there's so many people like you out there when you only look at one side of the story.
If you gave 4hours of your life to watch that mockumentary at least give 2 hours to this and you'll see it's not all that simple as you think.

 

[Donk87]

What next man? A link to vindicatemj.wordpress?

The chanlder case?
https://vindicatemj.wordpress.com/jordan-chandler-lied/

I was joking when I said it but of course you went there. Referring to vindicatemj.com is as useful as linking to moonwalkingpaedophile.com. Biased websites make utterly worthless sources.

Also for someone who doesn't believe words without evidence you sure do link to a lot of videos of people using words without evidence.

 

[GifLord]

I was joking when I said it but of course you went there. Referring to vindicatemj.com is as useful as linking to moonwalkingpaedophile.com. Biased websites make utterly worthless sources.

Also for someone who doesn't believe words without evidence you sure do link to a lot of videos of people using words without evidence.

There's so much evidence out there but if you have tunnel vision nobody can help you.

 

[Donk87]

There's so much evidence out there but if you have tunnel vision nobody can help you.

Agreed.

 

[WR]

There's so much evidence out there but if you have tunnel vision nobody can help you.

You would have no interest in defending Michael Jackson being a child rapist if you didn’t love his music. It really is no coincidence that all his staunch defenders are those who idolised him

 

[Sandikan]

You would have no interest in defending Michael Jackson being a child rapist if you didn’t love his music. It really is no coincidence that all his staunch defenders are those who idolised him

This is true.
There are big fans who could not possibly believe anything against him even if they saw some footage of it happening.
They just put it down to "Money grabbing" liars.

 

[GifLord]

You would have no interest in defending Michael Jackson being a child rapist if you didn’t love his music. It really is no coincidence that all his staunch defenders are those who idolised him

You're doing the same shit as the media did back then. Accusing him without any actual evidence. How do you know he was a rapist? Oh wait you watched the documentary
I hope you don't watch the one about flat earth.

 

[Rado_N]

"don't just believe what you see in videos"

"Why what's your evidence to the contrary?"

*posts videos*

 

[GifLord]

"don't just believe what you see in videos"

"Why what's your evidence to the contrary?"

*posts videos*

You have court document's just so you know.
https://www.ctvnews.ca/video?clipId=1659595
Liar, liar pants on fire
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...chael-Jackson-sex-abuse-claims-tell-book.html
What a guy this Robson is
You're all so gullible it's actually unbelievable

 

[GifLord]

The deposition recordings from 2016 were released a few days ago