Lionel Messi | PSG Watch

Isafim

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Sep 3, 2022
Messages
85
hmmm, I'd actually say in most common places, even caf. vast majority of fans will obviously know Zico's profile, basic info and the fact he was incredible free kick taker, but would they associate him with a 65 league goals per season player for example? something neither Messi, Ronaldo, Puskas, Muller or Pele were capable of? nah, it would be obvious that such fact require a bit of context and that context is of course the regional league. I read a lot so I know a bit about football's ancient history, but I don't think plenty of fans do the same and I genuinely think his 600+ goals in about 700 games isn't really a common knowledge among fans who aren't from Brazil. you're either overrating your average football fan or it's me who's underrating them.
if you're counting unofficial goals, Pele has scored 100+ goals in 3 different seasons.
 

TheNewEra

Knows Kroos' mentality
Joined
Jan 20, 2014
Messages
8,258
The assist was brilliant between the lines, and his goal was insane too.

Hasn't lost it at all, last year was just a hangover period.

Guys still the worlds best on this form. He's the GOAT for me.
 

TenHagsEmpire

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 4, 2022
Messages
68
Supports
Ajax
The assist was brilliant between the lines, and his goal was insane too.

Hasn't lost it at all, last year was just a hangover period.

Guys still the worlds best on this form. He's the GOAT for me.
If Messi continues in his current form he could win another Ballon D’Or (which is now based on season, NOT calendar year) further distancing himself from Ronaldo.

22/23 season so far:

1st. Messi (16+13) 29

2nd. Neymar (15+12) 27

3rd. Haaland (23+3) 26

4th. Lewandowski (18+5) 23

4th. Mbappe (18+4) 22

5th. Khvicha (10+8) 18
 
Last edited:

Gehrman

Phallic connoisseur, unlike shamans
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
11,175
So he's on 700 club goals as well now right?

Edit: no I miscalculated from his wiki. Close though.
 

wangyu

Full Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2022
Messages
1,351
When did top 5 leagues becomes a thing?
Yeah it irks me too, historically the Portuguese and Dutch leages have a far greater history, even the Belgian league has amassed its fair share of European cup finalists (all 3 cups combined I mean)
There is the big 4 and the 3 challenger leagues behind them, Portugal, Holland and France. I even struggle finding a French team that is a genuine historical top club. Marseille and St Etienne maybe but even that is stretching it imo.
 

FrankFoot

Full Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2022
Messages
1,377
Location
Chile / Czech Republic
Supports
Neutral
Yeah it irks me too, historically the Portuguese and Dutch leages have a far greater history, even the Belgian league has amassed its fair share of European cup finalists (all 3 cups combined I mean)
There is the big 4 and the 3 challenger leagues behind them, Portugal, Holland and France. I even struggle finding a French team that is a genuine historical top club. Marseille and St Etienne maybe but even that is stretching it imo.
Marseille is one.

France has been a top 5 league since the 90s.

Btw the "top 4" stuff was created in the 21th century, as Premier League was not a top 4 league in the 90s, back then they were behind Bundesliga and Ligue 1 in UEFA coefficient, and that didn't change until the early 2000s.

There was no top 4 concept before the 2000s, especially because before the Bosman rule, you had many teams from different leagues doing well in Europe, unlike now (21th century) where the portuguese and dutch league are irrelevant, and it's all about Spain,England, Italy, and Germany because of money.
 

wangyu

Full Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2022
Messages
1,351
Marseille is one.

France has been a top 5 league since the 90s.

Btw the "top 4" stuff was created in the 21th century, as Premier League was not a top 4 league in the 90s, back then they were behind Bundesliga and Ligue 1 in UEFA coefficient, and that didn't change until the early 2000s.

There was no top 4 concept before the 2000s, especially because before the Bosman rule, you had many teams from different leagues doing well in Europe, unlike now (21th century) where the portuguese and dutch league are irrelevant, and it's all about Spain,England, Italy, and Germany because of money.
You can go all the way back to see the UEFA coefficient from the very beginning. Spain, England and Germany have almost always been in the top 4 best performing leagues. England dropped down dramatically after the Heisel drama when they couldn’t collect points for 5 years. This meant only a few English teams went into Europe in 1991. Luckily Utd straight away won EC 2 but overall it took the English clubs years to go back to the level they were in the 80s.

It is true though that there was a lot more competition back then. The way things are going the French and Italian leagues will become irrelevant as well in years to come. EPL is the one and only money league. This is why the elite clubs want to form a super league.
 

Mb194dc

Full Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2015
Messages
4,673
Supports
Chelsea
Troyes is budget is what? Not even the salary of Messi every year (certainly not even a fraction of Mbappe!)? It's like a retirement tour playing for the Harlem Globetrotters. At least he should be fit and ready for the World Cup than can be a better swan song.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,789
Location
india
Troyes is budget is what? Not even the salary of Messi every year (certainly not even a fraction of Mbappe!)? It's like a retirement tour playing for the Harlem Globetrotters. At least he should be fit and ready for the World Cup than can be a better swan song.
Yet it was a close game. People keep ignoring it but City are more dominant in the PL than PsG are in the French league. Yet City players are championed their heroics.
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
I doubt anyone has more goals than him outside the box even if we remove the top 5 league criteria.
I’m just wondering when did top 5 become a thing. Looking at coefficients they aren’t far off dropping to 7th /8th and I wouldn’t immediately say that French football is above Portugueses football as an example
 

Acrobat7

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
5,313
Supports
Bayern Munich
It annoys me so much that it makes me happy that he plays well again. Fecking PSG…
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,949
Location
France
I’m just wondering when did top 5 become a thing. Looking at coefficients they aren’t far off dropping to 7th /8th and I wouldn’t immediately say that French football is above Portugueses football as an example
The reason is purely practical. Advanced stats providers started by focusing on what is perceived as the top 5 leagues simply due to a lack of resources to go beyond that and started making that distinction when mentioning stats across several leagues.

Edit: Regarding french football, french football is better in depth and it's not close. But Benfica and Porto have historically been as good as the top french sides.
 

Gehrman

Phallic connoisseur, unlike shamans
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
11,175
Don't know why people just cant enjoy his exquisite goals and assists even if its for PSG in the french league. 95% of his games are going to be there, so I dont why everyone wants to bring it up everytime he plays some good football. We all know its not the PL or La liga. Its just nice seeing a great of the game returning to some good form at 35 in what may be his final season.
 
Last edited:

Oly Francis

Full Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2018
Messages
3,944
Supports
PSG
Troyes is budget is what? Not even the salary of Messi every year (certainly not even a fraction of Mbappe!)? It's like a retirement tour playing for the Harlem Globetrotters. At least he should be fit and ready for the World Cup than can be a better swan song.
I might be wrong but don't you have a starter called Thiago Silva at Chelsea, who's starting almost every game at 38 even after almost a decade in Ligue 1? Did it make him terrible? Didn't Chelsea break the transfer record for a center back for Fofana, who's a pure Ligue 1 product? Weren't your last most dominant players (Hazard and Kante) from Ligue 1? What about Mendy?

Ligue 1 is a very physical league, any player who plays in France will say so, it's nothing comparable to a retirement tour.

We all know its not the PL or La liga. Its just nice seeing a great of the game returning to some good form at 35 in what may be his final season.
There's far more physical intensity in Ligue 1 compared to La Liga. But unfotunately, french gaffers suck and the spanish league is far superior in terms of offensive production.
 

rimaldo

All about the essence
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
41,024
Supports
arse
yeah but don’t forget a lot of these european matches start super late, 9pm in some instances. those goalkeeper farmers have been up and working the best part of 15 hours by then.
 

Son

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2019
Messages
1,725
Messi has become a Harden/Westbrook of football :D. He'll stat-pad against minions and disappear when thing get tough. I hope Real gets PSG again in the knock-out phase, you just know he'll turn to shit.
Didn’t PSG dominate Real Madrid last season in both legs? Mbappe couldn’t finish that was the problem. He should have had about 5 goals.

Still boggles my mind how you beat City and PSG after getting totally outplayed by both.

It’s almost like a Madrid cult that re-writes history pretending they weren’t the huge underdogs to anyone watching those games. Not to mention he’s historically dominated your club on the pitch himself.

Your team isn’t really all that good. Get used to it.
 

IhabX7

Full Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2006
Messages
6,009
Didn’t PSG dominate Real Madrid last season in both legs? Mbappe couldn’t finish that was the problem. He should have had about 5 goals.

Still boggles my mind how you beat City and PSG after getting totally outplayed by both.

It’s almost like a Madrid cult that re-writes history pretending they weren’t the huge underdogs to anyone watching those games. Not to mention he’s historically dominated your club on the pitch himself.

Your team isn’t really all that good. Get used to it.
Mbappe was the problem? Talks of him winning Ballon d'Or after those matches. Messi was bad in those games, Mbappe was elite.
 

Gehrman

Phallic connoisseur, unlike shamans
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
11,175
I agree ... Messi's career can be summarized as:
"Euro 2012 winner Jordi Alba passes the ball to 2010 World Cup winner Pique.
2010 World cup winner Pique passes the ball to 5 time UEFA team of the year and 2019 Copa America Golden Ball winner Dani Alves.
5 time UEFA team of the year and 2019 Copa America Golden Ball winner Dani Alves passes the ball to 2010 World Cup winner Iniesta.
2010 World Cup winner Iniesta passes the ball to other 2010 World Cup winner Busquets.
2010 World Cup winner Busquets passes the ball to 2010 World Cup winner Xavi.
2010 World Cup winner Xavi passes the ball to 2011 Copa America Best Player and 2014 Premier League Player of the Season winner Luis Suarez.
2011 Copa America Best Player and 2014 Premier League Player of the Season Luis Suarez passes the ball to perennial B d'Or nominee and Brazil Captain Neymar.
Perennial B d'Or nominee and Brazil Captain Neymar dribbles past the entire Union Esportiva Cornella defense and cuts the ball across an empty net to Messi.
Messi blasts it in and makes it 7-1.
Golazo! Golazo! Gooooooaaaaallll! Messiiiiiii !!! Messi was absolutely magisterial! Guaranteed B d'Or winner!"

Golazo! Golazo! Gooooaaaalll! Messiiii!!!! Messi was absolutely magisterial! Guaranteed B d'Or winner!
 

OK_computer

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 6, 2015
Messages
92
Supports
Real Madrid
Didn’t PSG dominate Real Madrid last season in both legs? Mbappe couldn’t finish that was the problem. He should have had about 5 goals.

Still boggles my mind how you beat City and PSG after getting totally outplayed by both.

It’s almost like a Madrid cult that re-writes history pretending they weren’t the huge underdogs to anyone watching those games. Not to mention he’s historically dominated your club on the pitch himself.

Your team isn’t really all that good. Get used to it.
Mbape was by far the best PSG's player in this tie, what are you smoking :lol: ?

Messi hasn't dominated Marid for more than half a decade, get used to it.

Not even sure how to comment the last part. Real Madrid has won more CL in the last decade than almost every club in their entire history, but yeah sure, they are not really all that good. The coping is strong with you.
 

Anduin

Full Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2008
Messages
5,578
Location
Magical Manchester United.
Troyes is budget is what? Not even the salary of Messi every year (certainly not even a fraction of Mbappe!)? It's like a retirement tour playing for the Harlem Globetrotters. At least he should be fit and ready for the World Cup than can be a better swan song.
I really don’t see the difference for Messi in playing against the likes of Almeria, Elche, Getafe, Girona, Celta Vigo or Rayo compared to Troyes, Brest, Auxerre, Clermont or Lorient (even though they are good this season). I would say La Liga is more technical than Ligue 1, while the French top league is way more physical. There is a noticeable difference at the top level competition-wise (Real, Atleti, Sevilla, Betis, Villarreal v Marseille, Lyon, Lille, Monaco) which relates to the difference in UEFA coefficient, but I think it’s safe to say Messi would’ve just continued to perform at the same level in La Liga had he stayed in Barcelona. From this point, I don’t really get the “retirement league” reactions, he’s been playing well in every competition this season.
 

Hoof the ball

Full Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2008
Messages
12,311
Location
San Antonio, Texas.
I really don’t see the difference for Messi in playing against the likes of Almeria, Elche, Getafe, Girona, Celta Vigo or Rayo compared to Troyes, Brest, Auxerre, Clermont or Lorient (even though they are good this season). I would say La Liga is more technical than Ligue 1, while the French top league is way more physical. There is a noticeable difference at the top level competition-wise (Real, Atleti, Sevilla, Betis, Villarreal v Marseille, Lyon, Lille, Monaco) which relates to the difference in UEFA coefficient, but I think it’s safe to say Messi would’ve just continued to perform at the same level in La Liga had he stayed in Barcelona. From this point, I don’t really get the “retirement league” reactions, he’s been playing well in every competition this season.
Yep. Funny how Barca are back-to-back Europa League post-Messi. Hmmm.
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
I really don’t see the difference for Messi in playing against the likes of Almeria, Elche, Getafe, Girona, Celta Vigo or Rayo compared to Troyes, Brest, Auxerre, Clermont or Lorient (even though they are good this season). I would say La Liga is more technical than Ligue 1, while the French top league is way more physical. There is a noticeable difference at the top level competition-wise (Real, Atleti, Sevilla, Betis, Villarreal v Marseille, Lyon, Lille, Monaco) which relates to the difference in UEFA coefficient, but I think it’s safe to say Messi would’ve just continued to perform at the same level in La Liga had he stayed in Barcelona. From this point, I don’t really get the “retirement league” reactions, he’s been playing well in every competition this season.
See those poor La Liga teams you mentioned? Now imagine a league full of them without pressure to win the league.
 

antk

Full Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2021
Messages
810
See those poor La Liga teams you mentioned? Now imagine a league full of them without pressure to win the league.
In the eleven years since QSI bought PSG, Barcelona has won 6 league titles, PSG 8.

Granted the average gap between 1st and 2nd was higher in France than Spain.