rimaldo
All about the essence
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2008
- Messages
- 41,067
- Supports
- arse
flip, you fools.That's quite the u-turn
flip, you fools.That's quite the u-turn
I mainly agree but fairness doesn’t come into it, only desire to buy and desire to sell.We really shouldn't offer them a single quid more. £50m+5m is a more than fair offer for a player like Mount with one year left on his contract, and who wants to leave. There was no sensible reason for them to reject it other than they got greedy.
Tell that lardy American cnut to stick his offer of negotiations up his arse, and move on to other targets. If possible, sign Mount for free in January.
Tuchel loves him and he was very good for Tuchel.Think Bayern fans would dislike him very quickly, nowhere near the level they are used to.
Mount fc is going to be unbearableHe will be our first signing. Everything else is non sense.
Maybe Bayern but they won't sell to Arsenal or Liverpool for a lower price. Our offer apparently still stands and Chelsea would look ridiculous if they sold to Arsenal or Liverpool for a lower fee.If we walk away from Mount, I can see him joining Arse/ Liverpool/ Bayern for a fraction of what we were quoted. It’s bullshit.
It’s the fact someone at the club seen our bid and said let’s reject it and go back with 58 + 7 and all the reports who got briefed didn’t laugh at them.Maybe Bayern but they won't sell to Arsenal or Liverpool for a lower price. Our offer apparently still stands and Chelsea would look ridiculous if they sold to Arsenal or Liverpool for a lower fee.
Doubt if Chelsea wil sell him to arsenal -- unless beohley doesn't feel that Chelsea fans don't hate him enough.If we walk away from Mount, I can see him joining Arse/ Liverpool/ Bayern for a fraction of what we were quoted. It’s bullshit.
If we want to break the cycle of the 'united tax' you have to show sellers that you mean business.Do we really walk away for the sake of £3m which is nothing in terms of fees or salary. Add ons may or may not become payable, but If they do it is most likely a good thing.
if Ten Hag wants him just get it done and let’s move on
£50+5 with a year left on his contract. It’s pretty simple why it’s not just £3m more.Do we really walk away for the sake of £3m which is nothing in terms of fees or salary. Add ons may or may not become payable, but If they do it is most likely a good thing.
if Ten Hag wants him just get it done and let’s move on
Eh? FdJ went on till August. We are only in mid-juneFirst fdj now this. Oof
The phrase cutting your nose to spite your face comes to mind.If we want to break the cycle of the 'united tax' you have to show sellers that you mean business.
Salah was an alternative suggestion for Klopp, and look how it turned out. A manager wouldn’t always be right, that’s why you have a team responsible for transfers. So when the manager is being silly, as in the case of Mount (overrated/out of form), alternatives can be found.I’ll be pretty upset if we don’t get Mount. For a start, he’s vastly underrated on here. He’s also a perfect fit, I think for the number 8, and rotate into the 10 position. He’s press resistant, great on the ball and has a terrific engine. His defensive work is underrated too. 24, yet to enter his prime, available for a reasonable fee because of his contract situation. He’d improve us so much.
But the main reason I’m upset, is because he’s ETH’s first choice. I fully back the Manager, I believe in his vision, and if we want him to be successful it means getting him the players he wants. If we sign Caicedo, for example, while a great player, it’s going to mean playing in a different way. That’s a huge red flag to me.
I really hope we get this done and move on to our next target.
What different way would we play if we sign Caicedo instead of Mount?I’ll be pretty upset if we don’t get Mount. For a start, he’s vastly underrated on here. He’s also a perfect fit, I think for the number 8, and rotate into the 10 position. He’s press resistant, great on the ball and has a terrific engine. His defensive work is underrated too. 24, yet to enter his prime, available for a reasonable fee because of his contract situation. He’d improve us so much.
But the main reason I’m upset, is because he’s ETH’s first choice. I fully back the Manager, I believe in his vision, and if we want him to be successful it means getting him the players he wants. If we sign Caicedo, for example, while a great player, it’s going to mean playing in a different way. That’s a huge red flag to me.
I really hope we get this done and move on to our next target.
Is that a joke? They are completely different players.What different way would we play if we sign Caicedo instead of Mount?
Bayern needs a no. 9, a no. 6 and some defenders as Pavard and Hernandez are probably leaving.Not sure why some of you can’t see these latest “twists” for what they are: bluff and counter-bluff.
Mount isn’t going to Bayern any more than Caceido is coming to us - it’s all just part of the negotiations.
You all need to grab some popcorn and chill.
Not sure ETH sees it that way.We need a Caicedo more than a Mount
You should phone up ten Hag and offer your insights, seeing as how you apparently know better than him which players he needs to execute his vision.We need a Caicedo more than a Mount
Man Utd probably will submit a 60m+ 5m offer last day of the transfer window.
I think Chelsea either accept close to the current offer, or we'll pull a rabbit out of the hat ala CasemiroMan Utd probably will submit a 60m+ 5m offer last day of the transfer window.
I was genuinely curious on your take. I know they are different players but I'd imagined EtH would use them in the same position but I am really not sure how the build up would change between the two since I see neither a exceptionally good at build up like De Jong for example.Is that a joke? They are completely different players.
I read somewhere they need to clear their books by 30th June. Otherwise FFP will become an issueMan Utd probably will submit a 60m+ 5m offer last day of the transfer window.