Masterpieces that were initially hated by critics.

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
Reading a piece by Christopher Nolan about the fiftieth anniversary of 2001: A Space Odessey in today's Sunday Times.

I hadn't realised that 2001 was initially poorly recieved. Apparently there were hundreds of walkouts, boos and hisses at the film's premier. The critics hated it, the co-writer was left in tears and one MGM executive said it would be the end of Kubrick. Yet the general public flocked to see it in droves, making it the biggest selling film of 1968 before critics eventually came to regard it as a work of genius.

Can you think of any other examples now-acclaimed books, films and music which were initially met with as negative a reception as that? Also, which critically derided works of recent years do you think will be later reassessed in a similar way?
 

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,737
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
Showgirls is the first that comes to mind.
 

harms

Shining Star of Paektu Mountain
Staff
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
28,036
Location
Moscow
My first thought when I saw the title was "oh, I'll name 2001!" :lol:
 

ivaldo

Mediocre Horse Whisperer, s'up wid chew?
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Messages
28,699
The Great Gatsby wasnt entirely well received and initial sales were pretty poor.
 

T00lsh3d

T00ly O' Sh3d
Joined
Mar 20, 2014
Messages
8,487
Weren’t Led Zeppelin slated in their early days? Bit young to know personally
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
Weren’t Led Zeppelin slated in their early days? Bit young to know personally
Yep. I think Page refused to do interviews for something like two years after their third (and best) album was met with a rough reception.
 

Scarecrow

Having a week off
Joined
Feb 6, 2012
Messages
12,304
Moreso ignored and underappreciated than hated, as far as I know. But I get what you mean.

Fight Club wasn't much of a hit when it came out, was it?

Pretty sure The Shining had a "worst performance" award of some kind and wasn't received well. Seems to be the case with a lot of Kubrick’s work.
 
Last edited:

dumbo

Don't Just Fly…Soar!
Scout
Joined
Jan 6, 2008
Messages
9,375
Location
Thucydides nuts
Moby Dick was considered trash belonging to the worst school of Bedlam literature. Wuthering Heights was noted for its vulgar depravity. Peeping Tom wasn't well recieved and Frankenstein had mixed reviews.
 

T00lsh3d

T00ly O' Sh3d
Joined
Mar 20, 2014
Messages
8,487
They've stolen a ton of other people music and pass it off as their own.
Ahh ok, wondered what he meant. The way it was worded made it sound like actual theft, rather than plagiarism, which is a bit more subjective. I was wondering what they’d nicked :lol:
 

711

Verified Bird Expert
Scout
Joined
Dec 10, 2007
Messages
24,271
Location
Don't sign old players and cast offs
I still think 2001's rubbish. And I'm a sci-fi fan.

I did read once that the cast and makers of Casablanca didn't think they'd done anything special at the time.
 

Oaencha

Full Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2014
Messages
2,237
Moby Dick, Eyes Wide Shut and Con Air
Eyes Wide Shut is definitely not a masterpiece but I actually really liked it. In my opinion there are two reasons why it was so poorly received by critics.

1 - It was Kubrick’s last film and expectations were crazy high.

2 - Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman being cast.

Interesting fact. Even though Cruise and Kidman were married at the time, their sexual chemistry was apparently so bad that Kubrick hired couple counsellers and sex therapists to help them seem more plausible in the romantic scenes. Needless to say their marriage didn’t last.
 

OnlyTwoDaSilvas

Gullible
Joined
Feb 4, 2013
Messages
21,687
Location
The Mathews Bridge
Weezer - Pinkerton

Though I still think Blue is better, it is retrospectively admired. It bombed at the time and was widely disregarded for a few years, until it seemed to become cool to like it again. Now it seems universally loved and would probably be voted as their best album.
 

VorZakone

What would Kenny G do?
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
32,985
Scarface? I think it took a long while before being regarded as a classic.
 

Ish

Lights on for Luke
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
32,258
Location
Voted the best city in the world
Rumors that sir Alex have been rushed to hospital Screenrant has a decent, albeit surprising list of sorts.

The first movie that sprung to mind was actually Balde runner (original). Through I read it wasn’t well received (by critics) initially but has since gone on to be a classic.

Some other mentions in here:
https://screenrant.com/great-movies-panned-critics/

Fight club being in there is a surprise though.
 

Tommy

bigot with fetish for footballers getting fingered
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
10,672
Location
Birmingham
Supports
Liverpool
Kid A.

Went from average reviews (with a few standouts on either extreme) to being considered the album of the century & one of the greatest albums of all time.
 

The Firestarter

Full Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2010
Messages
28,235
I am not sure if it's the same , because it was nominated for several Oscars and didn't win any. But The Shawshank Redemption is now regarded as one of the best films ever made, and is my personal best.
 

Florida Man

Cartoon expert and crap superhero
Joined
Jan 24, 2014
Messages
13,915
Location
Florida, man
They've stolen a ton of other people music and pass it off as their own.
Like who? The Birds is one example but Page wrote the songs that were “stolen” from them.

Tbh most rock n roll was stolen from southern blues artists though. Elvis and The Rolling Stones come to mind.
 

Vidyoyo

The bad "V"
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
21,371
Location
Not into locations = will not dwell
Yet the general public flocked to see it in droves, making it the biggest selling film of 1968 before critics eventually came to regard it as a work of genius.
My old drama teacher told me that one of the reasons it was so popular was because people used to smoke up and wait around for the dazzling light scene near the end. Might be an urban myth but I can imagine there being some truth to it.

On topic, wasn't Apocalypse Now received fairly badly? Also Vertigo - 'the movie was so poorly received in fact that Hitchcock himself eventually took it out of circulation, effectively hiding it from the public, in 1973. Eventually, after Hitchcock’s death, the film was re-released and this time thoroughly appreciated, moving on to be the classic it’s considered today'.
 

Ish

Lights on for Luke
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
32,258
Location
Voted the best city in the world
My old drama teacher told me that one of the reasons it was so popular was because people used to smoke up and wait around for the dazzling light scene near the end. Might be an urban myth but I can imagine there being some truth to it.

On topic, wasn't Apocalypse Now received fairly badly? Also Vertigo - 'the movie was so poorly received in fact that Hitchcock himself eventually took it out of circulation, effectively hiding it from the public, in 1973. Eventually, after Hitchcock’s death, the film was re-released and this time thoroughly appreciated, moving on to be the classic it’s considered today'.
Indeed! They’re both on that screenrant top 10 list I linked above.
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
My old drama teacher told me that one of the reasons it was so popular was because people used to smoke up and wait around for the dazzling light scene near the end. Might be an urban myth but I can imagine there being some truth to it.

On topic, wasn't Apocalypse Now received fairly badly? Also Vertigo - 'the movie was so poorly received in fact that Hitchcock himself eventually took it out of circulation, effectively hiding it from the public, in 1973. Eventually, after Hitchcock’s death, the film was re-released and this time thoroughly appreciated, moving on to be the classic it’s considered today'.
Nolan does mention in the piece that part of its success was down to the countercultural element, with MGM releasing a campaign describing it as "the ultimate trip".
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,638
Location
London
The work of Van Gogh. Totally underappreciated during his lifetime, he was really poor and dependent on his younger brother who gave him a salary.

A few decades after his death he became one of the greatest painters of all time.
 

oneniltothearsenal

Caf's Milton Friedman and Arse Aficionado
Scout
Joined
Dec 17, 2013
Messages
11,177
Supports
Brazil, Arsenal,LA Aztecs
They've stolen a ton of other people music and pass it off as their own.
That's a bit harsh especially considering that many blues and folk songs existed before they were even recorded. For instance, Babe I'm Gonna Leave You is cited as one of their "stolen" songs from Joan Baez. Yet both Zeppelin and Baez credit the song as traditional. And even though the first recorded version was Anne Bredon in 1960, its most likely that Bredon's version was simply a reworking of an older folk song as many of those songs were. "traditional" is probably the most accurate credit even though the way copyright laws are structured might favor the first "officially recorded version". I knew a musician who said most who had songs allegedly "stolen" declined to sue Zeppelin because they probably felt guilty suing over a song they just adapted from older folk/blues anyway.