DWelbz19
Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2012
- Messages
- 36,850
He’s a good player. Bit positionally ambiguous so I’m not convinced he has an actual position when Amorim’s gone, though.
And we would be buying the new players on instalments too, there’s no way we would pay more than £60-70m this summer and the rest would be paid over three years, instalments, work both ways plush Rashford is pure profit just like Greenwood and Mctominay that were both sold after June 30th 2024 so they go into this years accounts.That is not a 40M net cost though. We still owe money on Hojlund, Antony and Sancho as they were purchased on instalments and so the net would be closer to 140M and that is before we get into the fact that raising 135M in combined fees for those 4 at this point is practically science fiction.
We'll rate our transfer business A+ come August, then the season starts.Would be lovely to get early business done
I really really hope we don’t do what we’ve done the last 5+ summers though and overcomplicate things for ourselves. We need a striker. A goalscoring striker.
Not arguing the instalments, just the idea that somehow we come out at net 40M from the scenario given. I sincerely doubt we sell Hojlund or Antony this summer anyway and we are going to struggle to get much for Rashford. If we did get someone to pay 40M for Rashford it would almost certainly be based on us handing a big chunk of that to Marcus as a payoff for the much lower wage he would be forced to take at his new club. Marcus might be a local boy who loves the club but he is also never going to leave money on the table to facilitate a move and so if Villa will only offer him 150K a week we will be on the hook for the difference or we can just welcome him back to the squad.And we would be buying the new players on instalments too, there’s no way we would pay more than £60-70m this summer and the rest would be paid over three years, instalments, work both ways plush Rashford is pure profit just like Greenwood and Mctominay that were both sold after June 30th 2024 so they go into this years accounts.
I think top players tend to do this no? Means they score when the ‘goal scoring chance’ is low.As someone mentioned earlier in the thread, he is massively outperforming his Xg (he's scored double his Xg in fact) which is probably unsustainable.
He's slightly underperforming his expected assists though, which is welcome in a team desperate for creativity.
I hope he will do well here but to be honest after the last few years I find it difficult to get excited about any transfer. Even if it was Osimhen, I think I would still be expecting to be letdown eventually.
Well that’s the thing for me. I haven’t been.We'll rate our transfer business A+ come August, then the season starts.
Rinse and repeat.
Oh we badly need a striker, but how would you feel about this transfer + a striker?Well that’s the thing for me. I haven’t been.
Not that you’ll be bothered to, and I don’t blame you, but I warned this on here last summer that our transfer business was effectively nullified by not getting a striker
But this happens every summer. It baffles me. We might get a couple of forwards, neither with any goalscoring pedigree, and then scratch our heads in September when it’s shite again
Simply getting a striker who can score goals will make a significant difference. It’s simple. Our club has to always overthink and overcomplicate a simple fix
Nothing to do with him having played for ETH, and ETH’s preferences for former players?
It’s not that easy though. Or Liverpool, Chelsea, Arsenal etc would have solved it too. The striker market is dead. So teams get players in from other positions to score too.Well that’s the thing for me. I haven’t been.
Not that you’ll be bothered to, and I don’t blame you, but I warned this on here last summer that our transfer business was effectively nullified by not getting a striker
But this happens every summer. It baffles me. We might get a couple of forwards, neither with any goalscoring pedigree, and then scratch our heads in September when it’s shite again
Simply getting a striker who can score goals will make a significant difference. It’s simple. Our club has to always overthink and overcomplicate a simple fix
I think its safe to say we’ll sign at least 1 striker this summer. We need more than just a striker though I am sure you can agree. We need a whole new attacking line up, striker, 10, CM (who can score) and an attacking wing backWell that’s the thing for me. I haven’t been.
Not that you’ll be bothered to, and I don’t blame you, but I warned this on here last summer that our transfer business was effectively nullified by not getting a striker
But this happens every summer. It baffles me. We might get a couple of forwards, neither with any goalscoring pedigree, and then scratch our heads in September when it’s shite again
Simply getting a striker who can score goals will make a significant difference. It’s simple. Our club has to always overthink and overcomplicate a simple fix
I think if we're playing him as one of the 10s, his role will be creating opportunities - for others and himself. He seems to do that in spades for his current team.As someone mentioned earlier in the thread, he is massively outperforming his Xg (he's scored double his Xg in fact) which is probably unsustainable.
He's slightly underperforming his expected assists though, which is welcome in a team desperate for creativity.
I hope he will do well here but to be honest after the last few years I find it difficult to get excited about any transfer. Even if it was Osimhen, I think I would still be expecting to be letdown eventually.
Also we did sign a striker last summer and the summer before. They were just shiteWell that’s the thing for me. I haven’t been.
Not that you’ll be bothered to, and I don’t blame you, but I warned this on here last summer that our transfer business was effectively nullified by not getting a striker
But this happens every summer. It baffles me. We might get a couple of forwards, neither with any goalscoring pedigree, and then scratch our heads in September when it’s shite again
Simply getting a striker who can score goals will make a significant difference. It’s simple. Our club has to always overthink and overcomplicate a simple fix
Pretty much. And like almost every major transfer window we won’t sign a proper ball playing central midfielder either.We'll rate our transfer business A+ come August, then the season starts.
Rinse and repeat.
I have a bad feeling about this transfer. Surely you can get someone better at AM for way less.
To me he's mainly athleticism, which is fine attribute, but we need more refined players to get back up. Especially since we usually have less space to run into than Wolves.I have a bad feeling about this transfer. Surely you can get someone better at AM for way less.
Not my job but there should be plenty of good AMs in different leagues. Doesn't need to be PL proven. Maybe Cherki? But he's someone I think will grow to a very effective player.Name a premier league proven AM who we can get for cheaper..
Indeed I like it, if we can add identifying good players to sign we’re off to the raceswe're getting like barca these days it seems
perpetually skint and moaning about it but still manage to fork out loads of dosh for signings every summer
its almost as if they're doing it deliberately, and to be fair as a strategy it would make sense.. kind of the opposite of the Woody approach of saying we're minted
Cunha is actually very quick.
We need to sign some players who can do it in the prem in my opinion.Not my job but there should be plenty of good AMs in different leagues. Doesn't need to be PL proven. Maybe Cherki? But he's someone I think will grow to a very effective player.
More confident if that striker was proven whereas strongest links are to Delap who doesn't score enough for a Utd number 9.Oh we badly need a striker, but how would you feel about this transfer + a striker?
That's very cleverCunha believe it?
Delap as first choice would be huge mistake (which we keep doing 4 seasons in a row now). We need proven and complete leading striker like Osimhen and Gyokeres. Delap is another Hojlund type of transfer. Young prospect with his first good sesson in pro football.Release clause could just mean United pay beneath the amount serving as more of a barometer.
Either way it's a good prospective move. Followed Cunha in the Bundesliga many years ago he was thoroughly impressive. Left 10 sorted with him and Mainoo. Bring in Delap and suddenly the club have two players who can impose themselves physically and shove defences out the way.
I'd take Cherki for the 20 million euros and that's 100 million across three players in the attacking positions. Rashford, Sancho and Antony out gives some leeway over NET spend.
Yeah I share that concern as wellI don't mind Cunha because he would add a lot in our game but i am little worried about how it will affect our striker search. No10 should be way down in priority.
If we have money for both then great.
Having someone in that position who a) makes the right decision with the ball in the final third and b) can actually shoot is very, very high in my priority list after watching two full seasons of Garnacho.I don't mind Cunha because he would add a lot in our game but i am little worried about how it will affect our striker search. No10 should be way down in priority.
If we have money for both then great.
Like people have already said in the Delap thread he's not going somewhere to be a backup. I do agree that we should be all in for one of those not praying on a prospect like we did with Hojlund.Delap as first choice would be huge mistake (which we keep doing 4 seasons in a row now). We need proven and complete leading striker like Osimhen and Gyokeres. Delap is another Hojlund type of transfer. Young prospect with his first good sesson in pro football.
Buying Delap as backup for Osimhen or Gyokeres is another story. That would be awesome.