phelans shorts
Full Member
Never out
It was wrong, it clearly showed the ball missing.I'm confused...didn't the review say it was hitting..so why's he not out?
If your watching on Sky, they said the graphic was wrong. The original decision was not-out and as the ball was only clipping leg stump and not 'fully' hitting it, the decision stays as the on-field umpire called it - ie. not out.I'm confused...didn't the review say it was hitting..so why's he not out?
Isn't it because Hawkeye isn't 100% accurate, so they give benefit of the doubt to the umpire's original decisionI'm confused...didn't the review say it was hitting..so why's he not out?
The decision was so marginal that it falls within the statictical margin for error on hawkeye, and therefore the benefit of the doubt is given to the umpire's decision either way.I'm confused...didn't the review say it was hitting..so why's he not out?
It was wrong, it clearly showed the ball missing.
If your watching on Sky, they said the graphic was wrong. The original decision was not-out and as the ball was only clipping leg stump and not 'fully' hitting it, the decision stays as the on-field umpire called it - ie. not out.
Isn't it because Hawkeye isn't 100% accurate, so they give benefit of the doubt to the umpire's original decision
Ah cheers lads. I've got it on stream with the sound muted, all I saw was the graphic saying it was hitting, and got rather confused as to why he wasn't given outsamabachan said:The decision was so marginal that it falls within the statictical margin for error on hawkeye, and therefore the benefit of the doubt is given to the umpire's decision either way.
Funny what can happen in 10 minutes, huh?England are batting the game away from the Aussies right now.
Australia bowling quite horribly..
Fair, but those two were looking quite good.not sure England were that comfortable at 4/197...it was a good recovery by Bell and Cook from their 4/125.