Messi v Ronaldo | Contains double your daily salt allowance

Messi or Ronaldo

  • Messi

  • Ronaldo


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Dr. StrangeHate

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2013
Messages
5,507
Even kroos stepped up when needed.
Kroos, Modric, Nacho, Ronaldo, Marcelo (in semi and final of CL), this real Madrid team is full of people with never say die mentality. Even though I consider Pep's Barcelona to be the best team ever but in terms of individual mental strength in clutch moments there may never have been a team like this Madrid.
 

El Pasillo

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 8, 2017
Messages
272
What they wanted to replace is Benzema and Bale, both righted the boat in the last month, but they were awful until February.
I thought football was a team sport? Didn't Ronaldo scored a grand total of 4 LaLiga goals until the January? Or Carvajal being shite? Kroos not being able to make a noteworthy impact on Madrid's midfield while Modric had to carry that responsibility? Keylor Navas struggling to keep a clean sheet? Benzema and even Bale are easy scapegoats among Madridistas who never liked them anyway.

Benzema is pretty much irreplaceable in their set-up signing a replacement of Bale's caliber is easier said than done.
 
Last edited:

Peyroteo

Professional Ronaldo PR Guy
Joined
Jan 11, 2016
Messages
10,884
Location
Porto, Portugal
Supports
Sporting CP
I thought football was a team sport? Didn't Ronaldo scored a grand total of 4 LaLiga goals until the January? Or Carvajal being shite? Kroos not being able to make a noteworthy impact on Madrid's midfield while Modric had to carry that responsibility? Keylor Navas struggling to keep a clean sheet?

Benzema and even Bale are easy scapegoats among Madridistas who never liked them anyway.

:nono:
 

Ji_Maria

Full Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2014
Messages
608
Boys, it's really simple.

If you want to judge GOAT based on longevity and career, CR7 clearly wins it over Messi given the past 5 years.

If you want to judge GOAT based on "talent" or "ability," then either Ronaldo Lima or Ronaldinho clearly wins it.

In either case, Messi loses.

Now if you want to play mental gymnastics and twist and contort the facts like Liverpool, then by all means, stick by Messi. But at least be intellectually honest with yourselves.
 

Cal?

CR7 fan
Joined
Mar 18, 2002
Messages
34,976
Boys, it's really simple.

If you want to judge GOAT based on longevity and career, CR7 clearly wins it over Messi given the past 5 years.

If you want to judge GOAT based on "talent" or "ability," then either Ronaldo Lima or Ronaldinho clearly wins it.

In either case, Messi loses.


Now if you want to play mental gymnastics and twist and contort the facts like Liverpool, then by all means, stick by Messi. But at least be intellectually honest with yourselves.
Oh dear, where’s the Messi brigade? :confused:

You guys are leaving me to defend Messi?

I don’t think Luiz Ronaldo or Ronaldinho compares with Messi in either talent or ability. He’s able to do most of what the two of them was individually great at and combined it to a greater level than either of the Brazilian ever reaches.
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,316
It's remarkable how this debate has turned massively to going Ronaldo's way recently.

He's turned it around massively with the Ballon DOr's, if he can just get the next one, that might be the last one either win.
 

jojojo

JoJoJoJoJoJoJo
Staff
Joined
Aug 18, 2007
Messages
38,341
Location
Welcome to Manchester reception committee
It's remarkable how this debate has turned massively to going Ronaldo's way recently.

He's turned it around massively with the Ballon DOr's, if he can just get the next one, that might be the last one either win.
I think most people, looking at their style/attributes thought Ronaldo would age a lot faster and worse than Messi. That hasn't really happened, instead he's gone through another adaptation, that's preserved his effectiveness.

The other "often said" was that Ronaldo needed his teammates, whereas Messi could do it all. That was always a nonsense, football's 11-a-side. Teams are never about one man, but teams also need to know how to use their special players and maybe Ronaldo is easier to use. It's not really about a couple of WC matches that could easily be irrelevant after the next round of games, it's more about Ronaldo surprising people by defying expectations.
 

marjen

Desperately wants to be like Noodle
Joined
Jul 11, 2009
Messages
8,643
Location
At the back post
I think most people, looking at their style/attributes thought Ronaldo would age a lot faster and worse than Messi. That hasn't really happened, instead he's gone through another adaptation, that's preserved his effectiveness.

The other "often said" was that Ronaldo needed his teammates, whereas Messi could do it all. That was always a nonsense, football's 11-a-side. Teams are never about one man, but teams also need to know how to use their special players and maybe Ronaldo is easier to use. It's not really about a couple of WC matches that could easily be irrelevant after the next round of games, it's more about Ronaldo surprising people by defying expectations.
Yeah, but of course the CL titles where he's showed up for virtually every big game there is helps as well. What was his knockout statistics again?

He's just so mentally strong. More of a winner than Messi, wants it more. Messi's the superior talent, but Ronaldo's drive is even bigger than Messi's. (Which again I think is why Ronaldo steps up for a Portugal side quite clearly inferior to the Argentina side while Messi shrinks on the big occasion.)
 

Eddy_JukeZ

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
17,130
Boys, it's really simple.

If you want to judge GOAT based on longevity and career, CR7 clearly wins it over Messi given the past 5 years.

If you want to judge GOAT based on "talent" or "ability," then either Ronaldo Lima or Ronaldinho clearly wins it.

In either case, Messi loses.

Now if you want to play mental gymnastics and twist and contort the facts like Liverpool, then by all means, stick by Messi. But at least be intellectually honest with yourselves.
Messi has more talent than Ronaldinho and Ronaldo Lima easily.
 

VorZakone

What would Kenny G do?
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
33,006
IMO there's a lot of truth in Messi being able to shine for Barca because it's a trusted environment for him. He'll still do amazing for any team but just not on the same level while I can see Ronaldo being at his very best for any team you put him in.
 

Ji_Maria

Full Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2014
Messages
608
Oh dear, where’s the Messi brigade? :confused:

You guys are leaving me to defend Messi?

I don’t think Luiz Ronaldo or Ronaldinho compares with Messi in either talent or ability. He’s able to do most of what the two of them was individually great at and combined it to a greater level than either of the Brazilian ever reaches.
Factually wrong. Messi was never able to perform on the international stage.

Messi was never able to perform outside of Barcelona.

In 2002 WC, Ronaldo scored the winner in the semi-final, before securing WC victory for his team by scoring 2 goals against Germany. What a winner!
 

The holy trinity 68

The disparager
Joined
Apr 10, 2016
Messages
5,815
Location
Manchester
Boys, it's really simple.

If you want to judge GOAT based on longevity and career, CR7 clearly wins it over Messi given the past 5 years.

If you want to judge GOAT based on "talent" or "ability," then either Ronaldo Lima or Ronaldinho clearly wins it.

In either case, Messi loses.


Now if you want to play mental gymnastics and twist and contort the facts like Liverpool, then by all means, stick by Messi. But at least be intellectually honest with yourselves.
Messi scored 91 goals in a calendar year at his peak. Nothing R9 or Ronaldinho did in their careers comes close to that.

Anyway, Cristiano is very close to over taking Messi in my opinion, for longevity and what they have achieved, but peak Messi was something else entirely. The best player ever at any players peak, but peak alone doesn’t determine the greatest. In that case, Pele and Maradona are 1 and 2 in that order for me.
 

RedRonaldo

Wishes to be oppressed.
Joined
Aug 17, 2003
Messages
18,996
Well considering your past references goals and assists over their careers, not sure why you’d now narrow it down to just this season now. Oh, maybe it’s because you’re trying to be a deliberate WUM.
So why can’t we mention this season? And what’s wrong with mentioning the most universally accepted stats such as total no of goals and assists, and then narrow it down to this season with total appearance (upon your request) has anything to do with being a WUM? Doesn’t makes any sense at all.
 
Last edited:

Ji_Maria

Full Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2014
Messages
608
Messi scored 91 goals in a calendar year at his peak. Nothing R9 or Ronaldinho did in their careers comes close to that.

Anyway, Cristiano is very close to over taking Messi in my opinion, for longevity and what they have achieved, but peak Messi was something else entirely. The best player ever at any players peak, but peak alone doesn’t determine the greatest. In that case, Pele and Maradona are 1 and 2 in that order for me.
This is the exact "mental gymnastics" that I am referring to. I only referenced R9 or Ronaldinho in terms of talent/ability, but you have conveniently shifted the goal posts to "goals scored in a single season." If you want to play that game, you will 100% lose. You want to know why?

Because Pele scored 127 goals in a single season. By that metric, Messi CANNOT be the GOAT. He is off by over 30 goals. If you want to argue that "well times are different now," well guess what? Yes, they sure are. Back in Pele's day, you did not have single teams monopolizing the top-talent that allowed players like Messi to score for fun.

Do I care that Messi scored 4 goals against CA Osasuna or a hat-trick against Almeria? Not really. There is a legitimate argument to be made - why aren't other La Liga players scoring so much against such cannon-fodder? Well the answer is simple. Barca was the best team in Spain by a mile, and Messi was the best player in La Liga at that time. Duh, obvious.

But agreeing that Messi was the best player on the best team (by far) for a few years is completely different from concluding that this makes Messi the GOAT. We need some objective, logical standard.

And as mentioned before, every objective, logical standard falls against Messi. Unless you do mental gymnastics and believe that the GOAT-criteria is "most goals scored in club competitions from 2006-2013."

Here are some other criteria:

WC goals scored - Messi falls flat on his face
Goals scored playing for other teams - Messi never ventured outside of Barca
International competitions won - Messi loses

The only statistics that make Messi look good (and he was undeniably the best player in the world for several years), are club-centric. Messi only enters the discussion for GOAT if you turn a blind-eye to every other metric and disregard achievements of players like Pele.
 

Eddy_JukeZ

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
17,130
Lol no. Not even close. Ronaldinho and Ronaldo Lima at their prime (albeit short) were the most devastating footballers to ever play on the pitch.
Compelling argument that.

Messi is a far superior creator than Ronaldo Lima, and then a far superior goalscorer to Ronaldinho. There's nothing Ronaldinho nor Ronaldo Lima do at a much higher level than Messi though.
 

Cal?

CR7 fan
Joined
Mar 18, 2002
Messages
34,976
Factually wrong. Messi was never able to perform on the international stage.

Messi was never able to perform outside of Barcelona.

In 2002 WC, Ronaldo scored the winner in the semi-final, before securing WC victory for his team by scoring 2 goals against Germany. What a winner!
Luiz Ronaldo was never able to perform at the CL.

You could say he was never able to perform to Messi/Cristiano level at club level.
 

breakout67

Full Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2017
Messages
9,050
Supports
Man City
I've watched R9 and Ronaldinho. I'd say Messi and R9 are comfortably above Ronaldinho. Both R9 and Messi can dribble past several players and score regularly in their prime, but Messi did this for longer. Ronaldinho was a bit inconsistent compared to them despite being fantastic at showcasing his talent.

If R9's career didn't get cut short he would have been seen at least on par with Messi and Ronaldo, and probably better.
 

Zehner

Football Statistics Dork
Joined
Mar 29, 2018
Messages
8,135
Location
Germany
Supports
Bayer 04 Leverkusen
This is the exact "mental gymnastics" that I am referring to. I only referenced R9 or Ronaldinho in terms of talent/ability, but you have conveniently shifted the goal posts to "goals scored in a single season." If you want to play that game, you will 100% lose. You want to know why?

Because Pele scored 127 goals in a single season. By that metric, Messi CANNOT be the GOAT. He is off by over 30 goals. If you want to argue that "well times are different now," well guess what? Yes, they sure are. Back in Pele's day, you did not have single teams monopolizing the top-talent that allowed players like Messi to score for fun.

Do I care that Messi scored 4 goals against CA Osasuna or a hat-trick against Almeria? Not really. There is a legitimate argument to be made - why aren't other La Liga players scoring so much against such cannon-fodder? Well the answer is simple. Barca was the best team in Spain by a mile, and Messi was the best player in La Liga at that time. Duh, obvious.

But agreeing that Messi was the best player on the best team (by far) for a few years is completely different from concluding that this makes Messi the GOAT. We need some objective, logical standard.

And as mentioned before, every objective, logical standard falls against Messi. Unless you do mental gymnastics and believe that the GOAT-criteria is "most goals scored in club competitions from 2006-2013."

Here are some other criteria:

WC goals scored - Messi falls flat on his face
Goals scored playing for other teams - Messi never ventured outside of Barca
International competitions won - Messi loses

The only statistics that make Messi look good (and he was undeniably the best player in the world for several years), are club-centric. Messi only enters the discussion for GOAT if you turn a blind-eye to every other metric and disregard achievements of players like Pele.
Ronaldinho and Ronaldo Lima were my idols during my youth. I still have three Ronaldinho shirts in my locker. I spent hours and hours watching their YouTube compilations and I can assure you that you will have a hard time showing me highlights of the two that I haven't seen.
When Messi stepped up the scene and took over from Ronaldinho as the undisputed best player on the planet, I was pretty salty. People began naming Messi the "Greatest of All Time" and I thought this was so short minded since only two or three years ago, Ronaldinho set the world on fire with skill moves and plays Messi simply wasn't capable of. I was thoroughly in the R10/R9 camp and I simply didn't want to admit that Messi's the better player overall and I believe the same thing happens to you.

Talentwise, there is definitely an argument that Ronaldo Lima was better than Messi. He simply had everything. Dribbled like Messi, had a finish like him and on top of that an unbelievable physique that probably even excels that of Cristiano, although Messi is a far better playmaker. The thing is, we were robbed of Ronaldo's peak. We've seen a young and inexperienced prodigy with unbelievable skills but at times flawed decision making and later an experienced and clever striker who unfortunately lost much agility and speed. Unfortunately, Ronaldo was never the same after 98. If he was allowed to utilize his full potential, I agree that we wouldn't have a GOAT discussion right now since he really was a "phenomenn".
And Ronaldinho was probably the most skilled player in the history of the game but as talented as Messi? I don't think so. He has flashier skills but Messi basically does everything Ronaldinho did just in a less "entertaining" fashion. Messi is efficient in his dribblings, passing, first touches etc. but his end product is far better. Ronaldinho's best plays are just as impressive as Messi's best plays, probably even more impressive, but Messi just does it much, much more often than Ronaldinho ever did - both throughout a game of 90 minutes as well as throughout a complete season.

So yeah, for me, Messi had definitely the highest peak of the three and is also far more consistent than the other two. It is not about how many goals he scored but also how he did it and his general game.
 

KirkDuyt

Full Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2015
Messages
24,646
Location
Dutchland
Supports
Feyenoord
I love that the poll has been closed on 50-50. It allows this 'debate' to continue until the end of time.
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,656
Location
London
This is the exact "mental gymnastics" that I am referring to. I only referenced R9 or Ronaldinho in terms of talent/ability, but you have conveniently shifted the goal posts to "goals scored in a single season." If you want to play that game, you will 100% lose. You want to know why?

Because Pele scored 127 goals in a single season. By that metric, Messi CANNOT be the GOAT. He is off by over 30 goals. If you want to argue that "well times are different now," well guess what? Yes, they sure are. Back in Pele's day, you did not have single teams monopolizing the top-talent that allowed players like Messi to score for fun.

Do I care that Messi scored 4 goals against CA Osasuna or a hat-trick against Almeria? Not really. There is a legitimate argument to be made - why aren't other La Liga players scoring so much against such cannon-fodder? Well the answer is simple. Barca was the best team in Spain by a mile, and Messi was the best player in La Liga at that time. Duh, obvious.

But agreeing that Messi was the best player on the best team (by far) for a few years is completely different from concluding that this makes Messi the GOAT. We need some objective, logical standard.

And as mentioned before, every objective, logical standard falls against Messi. Unless you do mental gymnastics and believe that the GOAT-criteria is "most goals scored in club competitions from 2006-2013."

Here are some other criteria:

WC goals scored - Messi falls flat on his face
Goals scored playing for other teams - Messi never ventured outside of Barca
International competitions won - Messi loses

The only statistics that make Messi look good (and he was undeniably the best player in the world for several years), are club-centric. Messi only enters the discussion for GOAT if you turn a blind-eye to every other metric and disregard achievements of players like Pele.
Why are you counting Pele's goals in friendly matches to make a point.

And it was definitely easier to score back then. Football was much more attacking and less tactics were used. Pele also played for the best club in world in a regional league (there was no Brazilian league) which essentially meant that there were around 4 top clubs and the rest were shit.
 

Sparky Rhiwabon

New Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2013
Messages
16,946
I love that the poll has been closed on 50-50. It allows this 'debate' to continue until the end of time.
Yes, although Ronaldo was “on the charge” when the poll was closed - he would have gone ahead and pulled away. Clearly whoever closed it was a Messi fanboy. #jokingnotjoking :drool:
 

MJJ

New Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2009
Messages
28,954
Location
sunderland(1)-Derby(1)
Why are you counting Pele's goals in friendly matches to make a point.

And it was definitely easier to score back then. Football was much more attacking and less tactics were used. Pele also played for the best club in world in a regional league (there was no Brazilian league) which essentially meant that there were around 4 top clubs and the rest were shit.
Not much difference from la liga
 

Daysleeper

New Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2014
Messages
4,790
Supports
Barcelona
Missed penalty from Ronaldo, but unlike Messi Ronaldo actually has teammates to carry the slack when he has a poor game.
 

adexkola

Doesn't understand sportswashing.
Joined
Mar 17, 2008
Messages
48,492
Location
The CL is a glorified FA Cup set to music
Supports
orderly disembarking on planes
I see a lot of phrases in the form of "Ronaldo closing the "gap" on Messi". 2 questions then:

1. Is this solely based on Ballon D'Or + CL count? So does the "gap" increase if Messi wins either going forward?

2. Why are those the metrics being used for evaluation of said "gap"? The argument was never on Ballon D'Or count until recently.
 

Kevin

Nostrodamus of football
Joined
Jan 8, 2002
Messages
13,779
Would have been interesting if Ronaldo went out tonight after an amazing start to the WC and Messi somehow does something extraordinary tomorrow for qualification of Argentina. A swing of opinions of taunting comments/memes would have appeared in favour of the dwarf this time around. That's how fast things change nowadays :lol:
 

Hernandez - BFA

The Way to Fly
Joined
Jan 5, 2011
Messages
17,320
I see a lot of phrases in the form of "Ronaldo closing the "gap" on Messi". 2 questions then:

1. Is this solely based on Ballon D'Or + CL count? So does the "gap" increase if Messi wins either going forward?

2. Why are those the metrics being used for evaluation of said "gap"? The argument was never on Ballon D'Or count until recently.
This. fecking Michael Owen has one.
 

Nero

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2008
Messages
3,294
In the interest of fairness this thread now needs 15 pages of Ronaldo bashing like Messi got after the Iceland game.
 

Traub

Full Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2009
Messages
10,239
Open the poll again, It’ll swing in Messi’s favour. Then after a shite game tomorrow, it’ll swing in Ronaldo’s favour
 

prath92

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Messages
12,322
Location
India
I see a lot of phrases in the form of "Ronaldo closing the "gap" on Messi". 2 questions then:

1. Is this solely based on Ballon D'Or + CL count? So does the "gap" increase if Messi wins either going forward?

2. Why are those the metrics being used for evaluation of said "gap"? The argument was never on Ballon D'Or count until recently.
au contraire it was always a ballon d'or related argument. messi leading 4-1 was seen as the perfect proof as to who is better.
 

Kearnkoff69

Full Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
2,687
Location
yank
I'll be honest, the first thought I had after that missed PK was "I wonder if the poll will open again"
 

Amar__

Geriatric lover and empath
Joined
Sep 2, 2010
Messages
24,144
Location
Sarajevo
Supports
MK Dons
What would happen if Portugal lost today, Ronaldo would fall to second best(for some) because of one moment in the game?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.