Look, Leicester won the league in 2016 with 80 points because it was an open, competitive competition. That’s why points targets are nonsense.
Every season is different in terms of attrition and competition and a league winner on 80 points is no less a winner than a winner with 100 points.
Or alternatively, they won it because all the usual suspects had poor seasons, with Chelsea near the relegation zone in December, City announced the departure of their manager halfway through the season, and United were having trouble with getting shots on target. It was an anomaly, as shown by the points amassed by the next five league winners: 93, 100, 98, 99, 86.
This is exactly why points totals are better targets ahead of a season: everything else depends on how other teams do, something we have almost no control over. You can re-evaluate them in the context but as of now there's no reason why this team shouldn't be capable of getting 80+ points. If we don't, that's a failure unless we somehow win the league with that which is exceedingly unlikely.
And besides, what other target would be realistic? Continued progression in terms of positions? That would mean winning the league. Top 4? That's probably the bar set by the owners but we could easily go backwards in terms of performances and still get top 4 so it doesn't mean that much - as a fan, I want to see more than that.