Morten Hjulmand
- Thread starter The Corinthian
- Start date
Slow
News
Day
Stop with the H-land signings, we always sign the shite ones.
Nish
Related to the NT manager?
Looks a pretty good ball winner and comfortable on the ball. Stats dont suggest he does a lot with the ball so might not be a big improvement on McTom's buildup play. Looks a better DM than Amrabat though at least...
same species.
I had to read it twice I thought it was another Hojlund
Are we Hjulmand
Or are we dancer?
Or are we dancer?
No relation.
He just got his first international call up at 24. I'm not sure he'll revolutionize this United team..
Yeah, he’s not good enough.
How do you know when we’ve never heard of him
Ian wright started playing professional football at the same age
Hojlund, Hjulmand, Hojberg, Hojer, Hojholt, Hojgaard, O.Hojlund. Let's just confuse the opposition with players all basically named the same.
His stats - aside from tackling - are atrocious, why on earth would we think he is good enough for the Premier League when he's not even that great in Portugal?
His stats - aside from tackling - are atrocious, why on earth would we think he is good enough for the Premier League when he's not even that great in Portugal?
He's got nice hair. Perhaps ETH is projecting.
With hair like that he should be excellent.
There's no way someone with this name is good.
The commentators would sound like they're having a stroke.
He really isn't.
Not good enough at all (seen him for Denmark and in Lecce). Same level as Amrabat.
We've seemingly tried everything else, why not start scouting based on this. Why copy the likes of Brentford and Brighton with their newfangled data malarkey - let's blaze a trail.
Forlan for DOF of course.
Who?
We are going to sign everyone that has name similar to Harland.
Paying for Glazers sins!
Paying for Glazers sins!
Great province
Looks far too crap with the ball.
I’m from Denmark, he’s Danish and has played for the national side and U21. He’s not close to the required level.
I was only kidding
Yes, he sucks. United shouldn't buy him. There are plenty of other midfielders. Terrible player.
feck sake we're signing him aren't we
Just to clarify, I was being sarcastic. He's been great for us. Stay away.
Him and Gyokeres are part of the reason we're first. I reckon we need to explore more the Scandinavian market rather than the Brazilian that has been dud after dud.
How many "we have Haaland at home" signings do we need this year?
Hjulmand! There's no need to feel down!
How does Hjulmand compare with your previous two DMs in Palhinha and Ugarte?
Hjulmand is a completely different player to Ugarte. He's similar to Palhinha but a worse tackler and shooter but better passer and more composed technically. Both strong physically.
He's been very good for us but I don't think he's United material though atm.
This story is bs though. Not even the current United regime would propose something as ridiculous as a Pellistri/Hjulmand swap. Not only Sporting doesn't need a player like Pellistri, also United should be looking for proven players.
Dismiss this rumor like everyone did in Portugal. Hjulmand is doing very well and should remain here. He also wouldn't solve or have enough impact to change current United status quo.
I remember that fun fact from 6-7 years ago - that every player in the P.L whose name started with SCH had all played for United one way or another.....Schlupp was on trial and played one game for the reserves as I recall