Red00012
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2018
- Messages
- 12,201
Di Maria
Edward Woodward has logged inPogba has been massively disappointing but the fact he's such a global brand and probably brings in a fortune commercially for the club, makes up for it a little.
Lukaku was another bad one but we got most of his fee back so didn't feel as bad.
The obvious choice for me has to be Di Maria. Its like he was at the club at gun point. Constantly confused or unhappy about something. Then we made a loss on his transfer fee and ofcourse the beer bottle incident. Horrible signing.
(Not a record signing but Falcao was really underwhelming too)
Can't blame Berbatov. He has big shoes to fill replacing Tevez and then Ronaldo. What the others said are true though. He's not a clutch player and he didn't score enough winning goals in crucial matches. But he's still better than Martial. So if Berbatov is a flop, Martial is one too?Berbatov because he never even played as well for us as he did at Spurs. He felt he made it coming here because of the love Fergie showed him and it didn't then work out.
Mata as I knew he wasn't physically going to be a success as a number 10 at United when compared with a Sheringham, Yorke or Rooney.
Indeed, nor was he a record transfer.I expected more out of Chicharito to be honest. He had a great first season and a somewhat good second season, but in 2012-13 and 13-14 his form dropped massively compared to previous level
He seemed to have the tools to become a mainstay here for years to come...
He definitely wasn't the most disappointing. Just wanted to mention it.
The most disappointing IMO is Di Maria because he came here arguably in his prime. In Sanchez's case, we suspected that he wasn't the same player as in 2014-15 or 2015-16.
Sanchez wasn't a record transfer though was he?It’s a tie between Sanchez and Di Maria for me. 2 fellas who thought they were bigger and better than us and came only for the money, nothing more nothing less.
Sanchez. We literally had to pay him to play somewhere else and then pay him to go away. His contract was disgusting and he was so clearly on the decline before he came in. I never wanted him and called it early. I only wish city had got him.
Di Maria, I really wanted him and he was terrible and clearly never wanted to be here but nobody else came in for him. Why didn’t he just refuse to leave Madrid and save us all the hassle. One player I always love to watch fail.
Record wages in the league as far as I know. We are probably still paying him or inter off to this day. He also cost us miki who cost us what 30/40 million? The whole package was insane. Just a desperate throw of the dice from Jose to spark his attack and Sanchez had us by the nuts when we went in against city. I’d say city probably would have ended up having to give him 300k a week which was still daylight robbery for the player he had become.Sanchez wasn't a record transfer though was he?
Veron all day. At the time it was mega money for the club. He came into an extremely successful team and couldn't do what he was signed for. Pogba for example came in for veron money but into a struggling team, and at least for a few patches was able to elevate that teamSurely Veron was way more disappointing than those two?
Well maybe a declared wages record, who knows what some of City's players are on under the table. And I don't disagree with your assessment of how disappointing he was or that it was bad business all round. Personally I think it was the mistake that cost Jose his job, upset the balance of the team by playing him on the left. When there was (and still is 3 years on) a gaping hole at right wing that he could have occupied.Record wages in the league as far as I know. We are probably still paying him or inter off to this day. He also cost us miki who cost us what 30/40 million? The whole package was insane. Just a desperate throw of the dice from Jose to spark his attack and Sanchez had us by the nuts when we went in against city. I’d say city probably would have ended up having to give him 300k a week which was still daylight robbery for the player he had become.
Probably that and post Roman at Chelsea and definitely after the City takeover we just couldn't really compete with the wages those clubs were offering.It's Veron for sure - it was the first time Fergie ever went for a real Galactico type signing and obviously it ended badly
I think this kind of result (maybe Berbatov too) was one of the reasons Fergie was often reluctant to spend big in latter years
Martial came to us as an unknown young player, Berba came as an international star. I like Martial but have to say its time to call time on him if we don't believe he's going to win us a Premier league or champions league.Can't blame Berbatov. He has big shoes to fill replacing Tevez and then Ronaldo. What the others said are true though. He's not a clutch player and he didn't score enough winning goals in crucial matches. But he's still better than Martial. So if Berbatov is a flop, Martial is one too?
Say you have no knowledge of football outside of England, without saying you have no knowledge of football outside of England.Sanchez was crap, Di Maria a shocking buy, Veron I'd never heard of and he was so out of his depth at United it was laughable.
Sanchez was crap, Di Maria a shocking buy, Veron I'd never heard of and he was so out of his depth at United it was laughable.
Yes, he delivered some nice corners and has a good cross. Doesnt mean he played wellNot true. 27 appearances, third in the league with assists. Cesc with 34 appearances, Cazorla with 37. Second season he woulda scored more as well imo.
these players had the top four assists of the season in the premier league.
Player Country Assists Cesc Fàbregas Spain 19 Santi Cazorla Spain 12 Ángel Di María Argentina 11 Eden Hazard Belgium 10
It’s the epitome of playing well. Too many people are to judgmental by how things appear and not end result. His second season would have been great.Yes, he delivered some nice corners and has a good cross. Doesnt mean he played well
None of those were "record transfers".Can't believe leaving out Sanchez? It has to be the worst flop in EPL history ever!
What about the 2x Sch? Djamba? We must have purchased tens of those 3-8m players who hardly start. Only difference was, 20 years ago we machine gun on 5m players and get 10% right, nowadays we machine gun on 50m players and also get 10% right
Sanchez was not??? OK there was no lump sum payment, but involved a player exchange, and his wage was definitely a record.None of those were "record transfers".
You named 4 players none of whom were record transfers.Sanchez was not??? OK there was no lump sum payment, but involved a player exchange, and his wage was definitely a record.