Salt Bailly
Auburn, not Ginger.
Bit harsh not to replay the KDB strike during the analysis. That said, it's City so who gives a shit.
Honestly, I just tuned-in to hear how Linekar would work-in cringe Amazon references. Wasn’t disappointed.As per usual, a shite analysis for us.
Honestly, I just tuned-in to hear how Linekar would work-in cringe Amazon references. Wasn’t disappointed.
and would have spent huge part of the show if we had lost. It's been the same for some time now. Negative news regarding United gets more attention and sells more in any form of media and has been well abused given the state of the fanbase right now.Spent about 2 minutes talking about the United game. Not a mention or replay of the Greenwood goal.
Danny Murphy saying Aubameyang was unlucky to get a red card...okay mate.
Murphy wanked himself inside out over firminos goal. "Exquisite finish" from 2 yards out. Completely dismissed Robertson's "tackle".Spent about 2 minutes talking about the United game. Not a mention or replay of the Greenwood goal.
They didn't show a replay of the Palace goal, which I missed, either. Less gabbing, more action needed.Spent about 2 minutes talking about the United game. Not a mention or replay of the Greenwood goal.
Why is the city penalty a red when there was no guarantee of a goal where there was 2 united players ready to tap ours in after the goalie wiped out Chong? Refs just make it shit up
Haha I was thinking the same. Is he pissed?What's up with Alan Shearer?
Either pissed or the start of dementiaHaha I was thinking the same. Is he pissed?
Haha I was thinking the same. Is he pissed?
That's no jokeEither pissed or the start of dementia
First time I've watched MOTD this year. Pretty poor,isn't it ?
I like the documentaries Shearer does but his analysis is such rambling nonsense and Jenas,he clearly has a grudge against us.
Cant believe the charisma void of the later is going to present the show next season.
I like to see a audience viewing figures chart because MOTD has a strong sense of looking like its on its last legs.
Watched it just now on iPlayer. It was OK but lacking in that little bit of spice that the Sky pundits provide. The post match on Sky was far more entertaining due to Richards being a bitter tosser
MOTD goes for a more in depth analysis but as the game's already hours old...the impact is somewhat diluted
Watched it just now on iPlayer. It was OK but lacking in that little bit of spice that the Sky pundits provide. The post match on Sky was far more entertaining due to Richards being a bitter tosser
MOTD goes for a more in depth analysis but as the game's already hours old...the impact is somewhat diluted
Ideally,I think MOTD would be wise to actually cut down on the concept of bringing former players in for analysis,because the majority of them are either incoherent in their rambling or just come out with the same tired cliches we've listened and read for decades.
I think they may be better placed in bringing in good intelligent journalists who offer a (hopefully) a more interesting perspective.
One of the reasons I feel this is a avenue for MOTD to go down is purely on the basis of their coverage of last seasons COPA Libertadores final involving River and eventual winners Flamengo. It was refreshing listening to Jonathan Wilson's in depth knowledge on both teams.
They had that in MOTD2 with Mark Chapman which was my favourite footy show easily, I loved it...
Problem is, no-one else seemed to like it!
Won an FA Cup though- legendThat City legend, as soon as they became successful, they dumped him.
Come on.....get with it...He’s cheaper...I like Mark Chapman as well. He's a no brainer to take over from Linekar for me - can't understand how they've decided Jenas is a better choice?
I don't like him either, his face is too small for his head.I like Mark Chapman as well. He's a no brainer to take over from Linekar for me - can't understand how they've decided Jenas is a better choice?
No discussion of the penalty? Let's talk about how it wasn't a free kick instead
Yeah, I almost fell asleep listening to Shearer and Jenas resorting to the old tropes of attitude/pace/power/bla-bla-bollox. Far more influential on the results yesterday were the various tactical points that decided the shape and performances on show. For example, they focused in on Giroud and how much space he got against Everton. Not a single relevant point was made and the conclusion was that 'it wasn't until the 82nd minute before he received a proper challenge which summed it all up'. There was no attempt to answer the question why he got so much space, why the defenders were backing off, and why there was so much space between the lines in Everton's 4-4-2. All they did was describe what Giroud, Gilmour, Barkley and Mount did, but had no idea how to explain why they dominated the game.I only watched last nights MOTD day so I cant really judge the program throughout the course of the season just on that but I wouldn't class the analysis last night as in-depth.
And if it is, that's fairly worrying.
Ideally,I think MOTD would be wise to actually cut down on the concept of bringing former players in for analysis,because the majority of them are either incoherent in their rambling or just come out with the same tired cliches we've listened and read for decades.
I think they may be better placed in bringing in good intelligent journalists who offer a (hopefully) a more interesting perspective.
One of the reasons I feel this is a avenue for MOTD to go down is purely on the basis of their coverage of last seasons COPA Libertadores final involving River and eventual winners Flamengo. It was refreshing listening to Jonathan Wilson's in depth knowledge on both teams.