Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Mykhailo Mudryk / signs 8.5yr deal at Chelsea
- Thread starter cesc's_mullet
- Start date
- Status
Utterly bizarre
What's Chelsea's board smoking?
They're not paying the transfer fee over 8.5 years so FFP for this year should use the initial transfer fee whatever they've paid up front
They’re clearly using these contract lengths to sort out their FFP I.E amortisation going forward but feck me, they’ll come back to bite them hard!
pikachuface
Ok you are already learning. The goalposts have already moved from Lukaku getting a 40m fee !
He does look very good from footage, very talented and pacy. But then Antony does look very talented on footage too, so we will have to see.
Haha......I got it now. Too bad we missed out on him but it is not his fault Arsenal didnt pay up to meet Shahtkar's asking price. In no circumstances he should reject Chelsea's offer and the only offer on the table.
That's exactly what I'm saying. I think he would develop better at Arsenal than Chelsea. Future will tell but he really suited your current system and setup.
Potter did really well in Brighton with very good football as well. It probably will take a bit longer to integrate so many new players in the team. They got so many great talents in the team just this transfer window.
First time I'm hearing about this player, is he any good?
So the profit/loss is captured over the year Rather than being allocated to the length of the time at the club. Very risky indeed.
Would be funny if he turns out to be another Nicolas Pepe.
Sounds just like Pulisic....
Last edited:
From TheShedEnd
am I living in some sort of alternate reality?
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Chelsea player
Another €70m? Have they cracked the €500m mark for transfers yet?
They're just sitting at modest 425 million according to transfermarkt right now.
I think it was 1.5 billion that was promised with the takeover. Didn't think it'd all come at once!
Yet more American money going to Ukraine
Better athlete than Pulisic
Abramovich in shamblesYet more American money going to Ukraine
They keep buying the same type of players. Does this mean the days are numbered for some of their players, or are they just utterly clueless and buying who others scout? I remember back in the day city, and actually Chelsea, always seemed to buy players United had been scouting.
Not a fan of his tattoos.
You are my fire...
Ok but 100M? He’s literally never scored a league goal before this season
I do.Mate who cares about this stuff?
He's great but not even close to 100 mil great. Really exciting young player with a decently well goalscoring and creative output and a Bale-esque pace. An 8,5 half years deal seems like a risky deal all things considered but it looks like Chelsea prioritised their books (as a way to spread the transfer fee amortization) over their, well, brains.
This will end in tears for both parties.
Chelsea should make a Ukraine style kit.
Not how it works..
Players are considered as assets just like cars or laptops and written down over the period of their contact. The payment schedule only affects cashflow.
Patronising.
Yes - over the next decade for both on and off the pitch.
You lot will be complaining when that stops fully in a couple of years.
It affects FFP. The longer the contract, the less that is applied to FFP every year.
https://thefinancialexpress.com.bd/...-with-financial-fair-play-1624685004?amp=true
I still can't get over eight and a half years. That's effectively his career. If he doesn't work out and wants to leave he's stuffed.
FFP dodging sure but it's an insane move.
FFP dodging sure but it's an insane move.
- Status