NBA 2022-2023

ExoduS

Full Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2006
Messages
2,605
Location
Serbia
"Job is done. We can go home now." Sounds like me after work, except work is usually not done.
 

edcunited1878

Full Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2014
Messages
8,935
Location
San Diego, CA
That was never a defensive foul on Gordon and the NBA allowed it to stand because it wasn't clear enough to overturn and will stand by that. They tried to extend the series and keep Miami in this game, it's a bad call but right call to stretch the game and series.

Denver was the team to beat all year and even before Murray was injured, it was growing towards that and they earned it, well done to them.

Elite interior big, fantastic scoring point guard, and multiple defensive wings such as Gordon, KCP, etc. And a head coach to match in Malone, he gets it.
 

ExoduS

Full Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2006
Messages
2,605
Location
Serbia
Usually I end up hating the team in front of the team I want to win, but this Miami team I have nothing but respect. Classy coach, tough players - fighters. No quit in those guys, just hard, hard competitors. Unbelievable. Just listened to coach Spo's interview and heats off. No surprise they beat more talented teams. Fight, grit, courage.
 

R'hllor

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
15,419
What the feck is that post match presser by Jokic...did he just say... lul
 

slored1

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2016
Messages
3,532
Jokic is a titan of the sport now. Top 20 player of all time and he still has at least 3-4 good years in him. What a player.
 

Real Name

Full Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2020
Messages
14,363
Location
Croatia
MVP, best player in the league and in the world and in the same time the same kid who just enjoyed playing basketball.
 

Andrade

Rebuilding Expert
Joined
Mar 16, 2022
Messages
2,460
Congratulations to Michael Malone, MVP Nikola Jokic, Jamal Murray and the Denver Nuggets. First championship in franchise history (never easy) and there's a good chance it won't be the last with this likeable group.
 

Jim Beam

Gets aroused by men in low socks
Joined
Feb 10, 2017
Messages
13,111
Location
All over the place
Wow, that was absolute mayhem. I love when referees don't whistle much, but that was a bit too much in the first half and a foul call on Butler near the end was such a BS. Still, nothing but respect for this Heat team and Spoelstra, fantastic last effort.

Jokić will get a lot of plaudits. He deserves every single one of them and then some more. Absolute Don, both in the way he plays and conducts himself. The rest of Nuggets team were great as well. For example, Gordon defense on Butler was exceptional the whole series.

"Job is done. We can go home now." Sounds like me after work, except work is usually not done.
:lol: yeah
 

Ladron de redcafe

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2020
Messages
3,682
That was never a defensive foul on Gordon and the NBA allowed it to stand because it wasn't clear enough to overturn and will stand by that. They tried to extend the series and keep Miami in this game, it's a bad call but right call to stretch the game and series.

Denver was the team to beat all year and even before Murray was injured, it was growing towards that and they earned it, well done to them.

Elite interior big, fantastic scoring point guard, and multiple defensive wings such as Gordon, KCP, etc. And a head coach to match in Malone, he gets it.
Yeah that was headscratchingly bad. Gordon didn't seem to do anything there. Having a foul called on you and then having the officials double down on it after a replay was a little strange.

Great series by Jokic and the Nuggets. He's silenced all doubters now, surely. The best player on the planet the last 3 years and now he can begin building on his resume.
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,906
Location
London
Yeah that was headscratchingly bad. Gordon didn't seem to do anything there. Having a foul called on you and then having the officials double down on it after a replay was a little strange.

Great series by Jokic and the Nuggets. He's silenced all doubters now, surely. The best player on the planet the last 3 years and now he can begin building on his resume.
He got the MVP in the last two seasons, but I think that Giannis was the best player in the world. This season, when Jokic didn't win the MVP award (cause of stupidity of NBA pundits who vote), he is clearly the best player in the planet.

Denver is a great team. Teams usually do not defend the title, but they have the best team in the league, and the best player in the league. Sweeping Lakers, and gentlemen sweeping Miami, and having a relatively easy time against Suns is not an easy feat. Kudos to them and Jokic.
 

RobinLFC

Cries when Liverpool doesn't get praised
Joined
May 20, 2014
Messages
20,967
Location
Belgium
Supports
Liverpool
That might've been my favorite celebration ever after winning an NBA title. Looking completely unbothered, going over to every single one of the Heat players, and then "job's done now, we can go home" in your post-game interview. What a fecking legend :lol:

Seriously though, fully deserved for the Nuggets and congratulations to them. They made it look easy throughout the playoffs against tough opponents, really didn't expect that after they had their late-season "slump". They can also easily run it back next year if Jokic-Murray keep performing on the same level, although the Suns, hopefully Lakers, and a few other teams will definitely give them a run for their money. Tatum should be entering his real prime as well, although I don't wanna see the Celtics win it ever again. And hopefully Embiid can string together a few great playoff performances - both East and West should be really competitive next season.

I'd love to see Giannis battle it out with Jokic in the Finals.
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,906
Location
London
That might've been my favorite celebration ever after winning an NBA title. Looking completely unbothered, going over to every single one of the Heat players, and then "job's done now, we can go home" in your post-game interview. What a fecking legend :lol:

Seriously though, fully deserved for the Nuggets and congratulations to them. They made it look easy throughout the playoffs against tough opponents, really didn't expect that after they had their late-season "slump". They can also easily run it back next year if Jokic-Murray keep performing on the same level, although the Suns, hopefully Lakers, and a few other teams will definitely give them a run for their money. Tatum should be entering his real prime as well, although I don't wanna see the Celtics win it ever again. And hopefully Embiid can string together a few great playoff performances - both East and West should be really competitive next season.

I'd love to see Giannis battle it out with Jokic in the Finals.
Poor Embiid. Apparently, you can cry your way to an MVP, but you have to win the ring to get the real MVP award.
 

RobinLFC

Cries when Liverpool doesn't get praised
Joined
May 20, 2014
Messages
20,967
Location
Belgium
Supports
Liverpool
Poor Embiid. Apparently, you can cry your way to an MVP, but you have to win the ring to get the real MVP award.
The narrative that Embiid stole it from Jokic is heavily influenced by the way they both performed in the playoffs.

MVP is a regular season trophy and they were neck and neck, while Embiid finished the season a lot better which always influences voters. I think Jokic should've won it, but it wasn't a ludicrous decision to give it to Embiid like some are making out right now.
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,906
Location
London
The narrative that Embiid stole it from Jokic is heavily influenced by the way they both performed in the playoffs.

MVP is a regular season trophy and they were neck and neck, while Embiid finished the season a lot better which always influences voters. I think Jokic should've won it, but it wasn't a ludicrous decision to give it to Embiid like some are making out right now.
I agree that they both played in a very high level, although I think Jokic was better. However, Embiid was crying in media for over a year how he should have won last year and how he should win the award, while Jokic seemed to not give a feck, and was focused on how he will do in the playoffs. It was quite funny.
 

Zen

Full Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2008
Messages
14,557
No it isn't. Jokic was known to have had the better season well before the playoffs even started. In the past 15 years, so since the Nash years, only Kobe and Rose have managed to win it while not being clearly ahead in almost every advanced metric like Jokic was this year. It started to swing in Embiid's favour when absurd shit was being shit by like Kendrick Perkins.

He also didn't finish the season a lot better either, it's questionable whether he actually finished it better at all. Except the fact the Embiid dressed more, are we rewarding Embiid just for being fit now?
 

RobinLFC

Cries when Liverpool doesn't get praised
Joined
May 20, 2014
Messages
20,967
Location
Belgium
Supports
Liverpool
No it isn't. Jokic was known to have had the better season well before the playoffs even started. In the past 15 years, so since the Nash years, only Kobe and Rose have managed to win it while not being clearly ahead in almost every advanced metric like Jokic was this year. It started to swing in Embiid's favour when absurd shit was being shit by like Kendrick Perkins.

He also didn't finish the season a lot better either, it's questionable whether he actually finished it better at all. Except the fact the Embiid dressed more, are we rewarding Embiid just for being fit now?
How exactly are you valuable to your team if you're not playing? We're not rewarding Embiid, we're merely factoring in the fact that Jokic didn't play. Which of course has to count for something.

Like I said, I also agree that it should've been Jokic. But narratives exist (and are created) and will influence people, that's just how it is in the NBA and elsewhere. And it's not like Embiid wasn't great and dominant either.
 

RobinLFC

Cries when Liverpool doesn't get praised
Joined
May 20, 2014
Messages
20,967
Location
Belgium
Supports
Liverpool
I agree that they both played in a very high level, although I think Jokic was better. However, Embiid was crying in media for over a year how he should have won last year and how he should win the award, while Jokic seemed to not give a feck, and was focused on how he will do in the playoffs. It was quite funny.
Yeah agreed. Also think it played a part (understandably, whether people think it's correct or not) that Jokic won it back-to-back in the two seasons before that. List of winners 3 times in a row is quite something (I believe Bird, LeBron, and someone else, can't remember). Shouldn't influence people but unfortunately it does.

Jokic got the last laugh in the end though. Top-20 status all-time by now and has a few years in front of him to push for top-15 or even top-10 status.
 

Ladron de redcafe

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2020
Messages
3,682
No it isn't. Jokic was known to have had the better season well before the playoffs even started. In the past 15 years, so since the Nash years, only Kobe and Rose have managed to win it while not being clearly ahead in almost every advanced metric like Jokic was this year. It started to swing in Embiid's favour when absurd shit was being shit by like Kendrick Perkins.
Rose atleast lead a relatively mediocre Chicago team to 62 wins in 2011. The Kobe situation was just laughable. They were 28-16 prior to the Gasol trade and still "only" finished with 57 wins, well below the NBA's best. Chris Paul lead a Hornets team that had nowhere near the talent the Lakers did to 1 less win while leading Kobe in pretty much every advanced statistical metric and impact stat that season.

Kobe was only 8th in PER (Lebron 1st) and winshare average (Chris Paul first), 7th in BPM, and outside the top 20 in offensive and defensive ratings. It's hard to make the argument that he deserved it that year but I remember the media campaign even in the fall of 2007 about how "It's crazy that a dawg like Kobe hasn't won even 1 MVP" and that narrative seemed to help him in the spring just as the Embiid stuff helped him this year.
 

Ladron de redcafe

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2020
Messages
3,682
He got the MVP in the last two seasons, but I think that Giannis was the best player in the world. This season, when Jokic didn't win the MVP award (cause of stupidity of NBA pundits who vote), he is clearly the best player in the planet.

Denver is a great team. Teams usually do not defend the title, but they have the best team in the league, and the best player in the league. Sweeping Lakers, and gentlemen sweeping Miami, and having a relatively easy time against Suns is not an easy feat. Kudos to them and Jokic.
I think you could argue that Giannis was the best because it really is a toss-up, but I just lean a little more towards Jokic.

Agree regarding the MVP vote this year. He should have been the first player to do 3 in a row since Larry Bird. Also agree regarding the future prospects of this Nuggets team. They didn't face that much difficulty en route to the title. For all the talk about close games, they became the 4th team since 2000 to lose 1 game or less in the conference finals and finals.
 

WeePat

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
17,536
Supports
Chelsea
Don’t think I’ve come across any Nuggets fans in here but congrats to you all if you’re here. Amazing season. Deserved winners.
 

Zen

Full Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2008
Messages
14,557
How exactly are you valuable to your team if you're not playing? We're not rewarding Embiid, we're merely factoring in the fact that Jokic didn't play. Which of course has to count for something.

Like I said, I also agree that it should've been Jokic. But narratives exist (and are created) and will influence people, that's just how it is in the NBA and elsewhere. And it's not like Embiid wasn't great and dominant either.
Well not really, given Jokic actually played more on the whole season. He just rested marginally a bit more when the job was done, this has almost never had an effect on voting, and didn't this year either. Like I said, Embiid won because of Kendrick Perkins and some others.... JJ Redick, who was wildly praised in here earlier this week, called him out for it, but couldn't save the inevitable, the damage had been done.

Up until then, Jokic was absolutely running away with it. And I don't know why you're arguing it if you actually agree...
 

RobinLFC

Cries when Liverpool doesn't get praised
Joined
May 20, 2014
Messages
20,967
Location
Belgium
Supports
Liverpool
Well not really, given Jokic actually played more on the whole season. He just rested marginally a bit more when the job was done, this has almost never had an effect on voting, and didn't this year either. Like I said, Embiid won because of Kendrick Perkins and some others.... JJ Redick, who was wildly praised in here earlier this week, called him out for it, but couldn't save the inevitable, the damage had been done.

Up until then, Jokic was absolutely running away with it. And I don't know why you're arguing it if you actually agree...
Because I don't agree that it's that much of a travesty that Embiid won it instead of Jokic like some are making it out to be. It was a close call, could've/should've been Jokic, but I also have no problems with them giving it to Embiid. It's not like he was a nothing player during the regular season who only won it because of the narratives and the fact Jokic already had two.
 

RobinLFC

Cries when Liverpool doesn't get praised
Joined
May 20, 2014
Messages
20,967
Location
Belgium
Supports
Liverpool
Rose atleast lead a relatively mediocre Chicago team to 62 wins in 2011. The Kobe situation was just laughable. They were 28-16 prior to the Gasol trade and still "only" finished with 57 wins, well below the NBA's best. Chris Paul lead a Hornets team that had nowhere near the talent the Lakers did to 1 less win while leading Kobe in pretty much every advanced statistical metric and impact stat that season.

Kobe was only 8th in PER (Lebron 1st) and winshare average (Chris Paul first), 7th in BPM, and outside the top 20 in offensive and defensive ratings. It's hard to make the argument that he deserved it that year but I remember the media campaign even in the fall of 2007 about how "It's crazy that a dawg like Kobe hasn't won even 1 MVP" and that narrative seemed to help him in the spring just as the Embiid stuff helped him this year.
He should've (or at least could've) gotten it in 2006 over Nash imo, and I think in that scenario he doesn't win it in 2008 when CP3 indeed had an equally as good or even better case. He was the best player in the league that year but wasn't even top 3 back then though, I think because we were only the #7 seed.

In my opinion he was the best player in the league between ~2005-2008 but he didn't have enough good teammates to boost their record (or he didn't make his teammates good enough / better, whichever way you look at it - so that would be a fine argument against him). Couldn't give it to him in 2007 either because Dirk was the #1 seed and the Lakers once again #7 (and Dirk was great as well that season). When Kobe won titles 4 and 5 the Lakers were good but he was competing against prime LeBron for MVPs by then so no chance. Early succesful years he had Shaq's shadow hanging over him.

Context is needed but it's not a bold claim to say he didn't deserve an MVP in any particular year of his career, even though I do think he was the best player in the league for a stretch in the 00s. His best case for MVP was probably in 2006, then 2003, then 2008.
 

Zen

Full Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2008
Messages
14,557
To be fair, those ARE the only reasons he won it. Just because he was either the 2nd or 3rd best player in the League, which the massive majority would acknowledge, doesn't change that. The patterns of MVP voting for the past 10, hell even longer, years - show that Jokic would of won it by a big margin, which he was until Perk started gobbing off, I'd genuinely not even count the three in a row as an issue.... since up until about March, it was a shoe-in he was winning it, and there's legit not a landslide in performance from then on to swing it.

I mean, no ones sitting at their keyboards claiming he didn't put up the numbers or performances to be in the debate, but the wrong reasons put him over the line.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
66,199
Location
France
The more I think about it and least Embiid winning the MVP makes sense. Just think about it this way Jokic had a far better offensive win share(11.2 vs 8.4) while having a similar defensive win share(3.8 vs 3.9). Embiid scored more but it was on a significantly higher usage, Jokic was on top when it comes to rebounding or playmaking compared to Embiid.

If we are talking about the most valuable player, then Jokic should have won without even any debate needed. If we are talking about the most prolific scorer then Embiid wins.
 

RobinLFC

Cries when Liverpool doesn't get praised
Joined
May 20, 2014
Messages
20,967
Location
Belgium
Supports
Liverpool
To be fair, those ARE the only reasons he won it. Just because he was either the 2nd or 3rd best player in the League, which the massive majority would acknowledge, doesn't change that. The patterns of MVP voting for the past 10, hell even longer, years - show that Jokic would of won it by a big margin, which he was until Perk started gobbing off, I'd genuinely not even count the three in a row as an issue.... since up until about March, it was a shoe-in he was winning it, and there's legit not a landslide in performance from then on to swing it.

I mean, no ones sitting at their keyboards claiming he didn't put up the numbers or performances to be in the debate, but the wrong reasons put him over the line.
Can get on board with that, yeah. Not sure if you're US-based but the debate and Perkins' comments obviously didn't cause quite a stir back here, I mean I read about them but didn't really follow up on any shift in assessing Jokic vs Embiid that it may have caused.
 

ExoduS

Full Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2006
Messages
2,605
Location
Serbia
What is very promising is that MPJ, Christian Braun and Murray can be even better. I think KCP and Gordon played near their best but those 3 can improve... The question is how hungry they will be.

What Jokic did in this playoffs is legendary. 28 points in 94 point game with 75 percent shooting. Lead playoffs in points, rebounds and assists!

What I'm most impressed by is how organic this team is: Jokic, Murray, MPJ and Braun are all drafted or traded for before they played NBA game. That is 4 players who are almost perfect pieces for a dynasty.
 

Zen

Full Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2008
Messages
14,557
Can get on board with that, yeah. Not sure if you're US-based but the debate and Perkins' comments obviously didn't cause quite a stir back here, I mean I read about them but didn't really follow up on any shift in assessing Jokic vs Embiid that it may have caused.
Why would Perkins comments mean anything in Belgium? (Nor did they in the UK - but we're also irrelevant in NBA terms too).

The second he alluded to white voters voting white whenever they get the chance, Embiid odds dropped and he very quickly became the frontrunner, like within a few days :lol:
 

ExoduS

Full Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2006
Messages
2,605
Location
Serbia
Jokic just won it all and you lot straight to argue about Jokic/ Embid MVP all over again? Jezz..
I kept repeating that the conversation is so pointless but people love bringing it up. Irrelevant reward. This is what matters - championship.
 

Ladron de redcafe

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2020
Messages
3,682
He should've (or at least could've) gotten it in 2006 over Nash imo, and I think in that scenario he doesn't win it in 2008 when CP3 indeed had an equally as good or even better case. He was the best player in the league that year but wasn't even top 3 back then though, I think because we were only the #7 seed.

In my opinion he was the best player in the league between ~2005-2008 but he didn't have enough good teammates to boost their record (or he didn't make his teammates good enough / better, whichever way you look at it - so that would be a fine argument against him). Couldn't give it to him in 2007 either because Dirk was the #1 seed and the Lakers once again #7 (and Dirk was great as well that season). When Kobe won titles 4 and 5 the Lakers were good but he was competing against prime LeBron for MVPs by then so no chance. Early succesful years he had Shaq's shadow hanging over him.

Context is needed but it's not a bold claim to say he didn't deserve an MVP in any particular year of his career, even though I do think he was the best player in the league for a stretch in the 00s. His best case for MVP was probably in 2006, then 2003, then 2008.
I am not sure he should have gotten it in 2006, either, to be honest. Plenty of all time greats played with poor teammates which hurt their MVP cases because of poor team records. I'm not sure Kobe should have been given an MVP when others didn't despite having better records than the 45 wins the 2006 Lakers were at.

Kobe had his best statistical season in 2006, but he was still not the best in the world in any advanced metric. Even at his best, he trailed Dirk in every category. When you compound that with a poor team record, I'm not sure it's that compelling of an argument.

Steve Nash lost his 2nd best player and lead the Suns to the 2nd best record in their division. That's not to say Steve Nash was heads and shoulders above anyone in the league. If anything, I think Dirk had a strong claim that season, leading the league in advanced statistical metrics AND impact stats while leading his team to 60 wins.

The MVP vote is purely based on the regular season, but as just as with this year's Jokic-Embidd fiasco, it made the suggestion by some that Kobe was robbed (not your words, to be fair to you)...silly, based on his performance. Blowing a 3-1 lead with 1 point in the second half of game 7 was a far cry from what Dirk did, leading his team to the finals. Nash, ofcourse, was the one leading the Suns to what was only the 8th 3-1 comeback in nba history against Kobe and the lakers.
 
Last edited:

Andrade

Rebuilding Expert
Joined
Mar 16, 2022
Messages
2,460
Yeah agreed. Also think it played a part (understandably, whether people think it's correct or not) that Jokic won it back-to-back in the two seasons before that. List of winners 3 times in a row is quite something (I believe Bird, LeBron, and someone else, can't remember). Shouldn't influence people but unfortunately it does.

Jokic got the last laugh in the end though. Top-20 status all-time by now and has a few years in front of him to push for top-15 or even top-10 status.
It's Bill Russell, Wilt Chamberlain and Larry Bird, they are the 3 guys who won 3 in a row. Lebron has 4 but he never won 3 in a row.

I think if Jokic had been a champion prior to this season then he probably would have won 3 in a row
 

Ladron de redcafe

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2020
Messages
3,682
I kept repeating that the conversation is so pointless but people love bringing it up. Irrelevant reward. This is what matters - championship.
Next up is to target a repeat. Nobody besides the Lakers (2000-2002, 2009-2010), Miami (2012 -2013), and the Warriors (2017-2018) have done it in this millennium.

If he gets another title and FMVP, he'll join an elite category (players with multiple MVPs AND multiple FMVPs)

Jordan 6FMVPS and 5 MVPs
Lebron 4FMVPs and 4MVPs
Kareem 2FMVPs and 6MVPs
Magic 3FMVPs and 3 MVPs
Duncan 3FMVPs and 2MVPs
Larry Bird 2MVPs and 3 MVPs
And Russell and Wilt (5 MVPs and 4MVPs respectively) would have won FMVPs had the award existed back when they were playing.