LilyWhiteSpur
New Member
The volcano is active, it smokes, it’s a smaller type and while there is an *activity level* for larger volcanoes smaller ones seem much more unpredictable. There should be no tours at active volcanoes never mind around them. There is always a risk and we have no reliable indicators.There's a big difference between "the volcano isn't dormant but what are the chances" and "there are signs that an eruption might be coming" though. I'm guessing/hoping that increased activity was mentioned (since it went from danger level 1 to 2), but that it was probably still almost impossible to (correctly) predict the moment of an eruption. Activity could decrease again or it could take weeks/months/even years before it erupted, volcanoes are unpredictable like that.
It's still something which needs to be examined imo, and one shouldn't hide behind arguments like "it was an accident, just move on" or "they knew what they were getting into". If it is indeed like many say it is, i.e. couldn't possibly be accurately predicted by anyone, no one should fear criminal prosecution or have to take responsibility. However, just as an example, I've read that there was a kind of container which was put there to offer shelter in case of an eruption, yet it was placed incorrectly or something like that. Surely things like that need to be investigated in the aftermath of this, without having to put blame on anyone or point the finger to the tour operator.
@Dwazza Gunnar Solskjær post article explains it well. Volcanologists even when they visit a volcano they are head to toe in protective gear no mater what the *activity level* simply because they don’t know for sure what will happen. These tourists were most likely in T-shirt’s and flip flops, if anyone is to blame its governments to pass legislation that these tours shouldn’t be allowed. You have to remember here it’s more than likely that your guides also lost their lives.