KM
I’m afraid I just blue myself
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2008
- Messages
- 49,772
Here we go
No problems, its perfect.For the final, it's a two day poll. Hope the contestants don't mind that.
But Mani, I have shane warne also.Ambrose/Mcgrath/Waqar as a pair look more appalling than Wasim/Donald/Pollock
I agree but you only have 1 spinner in KumbleIn ODIs, both spinners are not easy to separate. Kumble's pace variations and discipline would help a lot in keeping the run rate down.
What is more important is that my top 5 are all amazing players of spin, and can easily cope with whatever is being thrown at them, while the same cannot be said about your team. Barring Sachin and Lara, everyone else is not as good as my batsmen against quality spin.
Not really, Jayasuriya is a wonderful ODI spinner, and was one of the toughest bowlers to score off in the middle overs. And in particular players who were not comfortable against spin struggled against him.I agree but you only have 1 spinner in Kumble
and I would pick Saqlain or Shane Warne as the best spinners of 90s anyway.
Saqlain= offspinner
and Shane Warne= Leg spinner.
Ambrose/Mcgrath/Waqar more dangerous when they hunt in pairsBut Mani, I have shane warne also.
Ask yourself, if you have to choose bowling order of Ambrose/Mcgrath/Waqar/Kumble v/s Wasim Akram/Alan Donald/Pollock/Shane Warne
what would you pick?
Warne is much much better than Kumble,When you take the success ratio on all playing condition,Warne top the list.In ODIs, both spinners are not easy to separate. Kumble's pace variations and discipline would help a lot in keeping the run rate down.
What is more important is that my top 5 are all amazing players of spin, and can easily cope with whatever is being thrown at them, while the same cannot be said about your team. Barring Sachin and Lara, everyone else is not as good as my batsmen against quality spin.
In tests, not that much in ODIs.Warne is much much better than Kumble,When you take the success ratio on all playing condition,Warne top the list.
He was untouchable in test and he was so good in one day.He got lot variety in his spin.In tests, not that much in ODIs.
How is Gilchrist better than Ganguly in the 90s?Considering 90's on batting front
Ganguly< Gilchrist
Sanath < Sachin
Dravid < Lara
Inzy > Pointing
Chandrapaul = Thrope
Cairns > mcmillan
Boucher < Razzaq
Zaltan's batting line up got more depth infant Warne coming at 10 is not the bad hitter of the ball.
I agree with that they never hunted in pairs,but when you considering this a real match situation.Ambrose/Mcgrath/Waqar more dangerous when they hunt in pairs
They never hunted in pairs as they never played together, on the other hand have I have Alan Donald and Shaun Pollock who actually played together, compliment each other and formed a lethal combo in 90s.
I got your point, mani but I think you should consider this and combine this with Wasim Akram and Shane Warne.
Prove me wrong Aldo.How is Gilchrist better than Ganguly in the 90s?
Leave it, I thought you had a point when you made the comparison.Prove me wrong Aldo.
i can say the same thing about you bro! heheYou completely ignored what I said, again.
I didn't have much to say, I agree with your analysis apart from the fact that I would never take Gilly ahead of Sanath as a 90s batsman.i can say the same thing about you bro! hehe
fair play mate, im just pulling your leg anywayI didn't have much to say, I agree with your analysis apart from the fact that I would never take Gilly ahead of Sanath as a 90s batsman.