There's something about Poch that people seem to like, myself included.
But at the end of the day, you can only really judge a manager on results - and his aren't good enough.
He managed to finish 3rd in a 2 horse race the year Leicester won the title and all the traditionally big clubs in England were off the boil.
The biggest question mark surrounding Ten Hag, is the league he has been successful in - but at least he's been successful in it.
Poch took over one of the most expensively assembled teams in the history of football, and came second in a weaker league than the Dutch.
Make whatever excuses for him that you like, but there is absolutely no evidence that Poch is the man to bring success back to Old Trafford. He might come in and be successful, but it would be a lucky punt that came off, rather than a shrewd appointment.
I'm not in a Poch only camp or writing of Ten Hag but you are hypocritical in your post.
Firstly, you mention this 2 horse race that Poch bottled? Spurs started the season with 2 draws and a loss, after 9 games they were 7 points behind CIty who were top and 5 points behind Leicester and United.
After 20 games which is over midway, they were 4 points behind Leicester and 6 behind Arsenal. Again, where you get this 2 horse race from ?
From being points behind 25 games in they were level with Arsenal and one point above City. 5 behind Leicester. So this thing where people say it was Only Leicester and spurs is a myth.
Poch took over midway and they were 3rd so its not like they were top and he lost the league, which he probably win this year anyway.
Also isnt Ten Hag the one who lost out to Poch being 3-0 in the second leg?
Ten Hag plays good football but is also a very naive manager when it comes to defensive tactics, we have seen that with Ajax. He isn't guaranteed to win anything with us either.