I don’t get the logic here at, sorry. I’m saying Bruce is underperforming and Hasenhuttl is over performing. I’ve presented facts that Bruce has spent more and yet one is above the other and one is, at least trying to play, proactive football
You should also factor in players like Ings, JWP, Romeu, Hojberg, vestergaard etc now versus when Hasenhuttl came in - he improves a lot of players. Hell look at Adams and Walcott, they are such average players. Now look at Newcastle - I rate ASM, Wilson, Almeron, Willock from an attacking sense but the issue is they play structured defensive football and they should be higher than they are. No one wants to hire Bruce because he doesn’t guarantee results and he guarantees shit football.
Your question was why is one manager in contention for jobs like Spurs but the other isn’t , well there’s your answer.