Zen86
Full Member
I'm sure they can. We're not talking about "a keeper" though are we, we're talking about DDG.You dont think a keeper can improve from the age of 30? You sure about that?
I'm sure they can. We're not talking about "a keeper" though are we, we're talking about DDG.You dont think a keeper can improve from the age of 30? You sure about that?
What are the unique characteristics that make improvement impossible in De Gea then?I'm sure they can. We're not talking about "a keeper" though are we, we're talking about DDG.
Well, the downward trajectory over the last couple of years is my big indicator. Do tell me what yours is.What are the unique characteristics that make improvement impossible in De Gea then?
Van der Sar was 30 when he signed for Fulham for instance. It's not really a great age for a keeper.
His reflexes were amazing from the startIt's not a big problem because it's something that can be improved on and developed by a proper GK coach. Many GKs improve in such aspects over the time. De Gea himself improved.
That doesn't make it impossible for him to regain focus or form though. If a player picks up an injury you can say he'll never regain form but outside of that there's no reason.Well, the downward trajectory over the last couple of years is my big indicator. Do tell me what yours is.
And Van der Sar moved clubs to recover his form.
What helped De Gea from the start was that he has exceptional reflexes and this unfortunately can't be coached or gained, you either have it or not, but as an overall GK he improved a lot from his first season to what he has become since Moyes season from what I remember and this is the role of GK coaches. I'm sure Henderson can improve this aspect over time, or that's what I hope.De Gea was an exceptional shot stopper from the very start. He let in two tame long range shots in his first two games due to nerves ( one vs City and one vs West Brom in season opener), which might have lead to the reputation, but teams tried the same tactic with him for the rest of that season and didn’t get any joy from it.
Off the top of my head, top GKs of the past few decades always had great reflexes and shot stopping from a young age. Kahn, VdS, Big Pete, Casillas, Cech, Lehman, Buffon, Neuer, Navas, Oblak, so on and so forth. The only notable exception I can think of is Valdes and even he was no slouch either . And we need that level of quality.
The problem is that De Gea is a keeper who has always relied almost entirely on being one of the best pure shot stoppers of all time. Pretty much every other aspect of his game is average or worse, and he's never shown any significant improvement in those areas.What are the unique characteristics that make improvement impossible in De Gea then?
Van der Sar was 30 when he signed for Fulham for instance. It's not really a great age for a keeper.
DDG has proven over the last three years that he doesn't deserve to be #1 anymore. Nobody knows whether Henderson can take that role, but the only way to find out is for him to get an extended run. Now obviously if he starts regularly having absolute shockers then we can bring DDG back in to get us through the rest of the season, and that gives us our answer so we can look to sign somebody else in the summer (Donnarumma on a free?). The hope will be Henderson steps up but it'll be up to him to do so.Henderson has done nothing to show he deserves 1st choice over DDG. there's big doubts as to whether he ever deserves that spot.
His reflexes at Atleti was amazing too. I remember I was watching a game and he literally was clawing impossible saves one game.His reflexes were amazing from the start
I think you're arguing for the sake of it.That doesn't make it impossible for him to regain focus or form though. If a player picks up an injury you can say he'll never regain form but outside of that there's no reason.
Most players will go through fluctuations in form. If there's an expectation that De Gea had to not have a single bad patch during his goalkeeping career with us that's very harsh.
agree about DDG. frankly i don't think either are good enough anymore (although i do think we have bigger problems in the squad than DDG). Donnarumma would be perfect, i'd be throwing him a massive contract that Milan couldn't compete with.DDG has proven over the last three years that he doesn't deserve to be #1 anymore. Nobody knows whether Henderson can take that role, but the only way to find out is for him to get an extended run. Now obviously if he starts regularly having absolute shockers then we can bring DDG back in to get us through the rest of the season, and that gives us our answer so we can look to sign somebody else in the summer (Donnarumma on a free?). The hope will be Henderson steps up but it'll be up to him to do so.
Fair point but there have been other keepers with insane reflexes who didn't regress quite so soon.The problem is that De Gea is a keeper who has always relied almost entirely on being one of the best pure shot stoppers of all time. Pretty much every other aspect of his game is average or worse, and he's never shown any significant improvement in those areas.
Keepers who play on until a good age tend to be ones who have strong all-round games who can compensate for losing some of their agility. The keeper that De Gea was most often compared to was Casillas, another one who relied very heavily on reflexes and agility. Casillas dropped off badly once he got to 29 or 30, and there has always been a worry that De Gea would do the same.
I honestly have no idea how good Donnarumma is. I know a few years ago I didn't think he was as good as what the hype made out, but of course he was so ridiculously young that he still looked quite likely to go on to be one of the best. However it also wouldn't have surprised me if he was just an early bloomer and never quite took the step up to the very top level. I basically haven't watched him play the last two or three years so I don't know how that rate of improvement has been.agree about DDG. frankly i don't think either are good enough anymore (although i do think we have bigger problems in the squad than DDG). Donnarumma would be perfect, i'd be throwing him a massive contract that Milan couldn't compete with.
He cost us top 4 and a CL spot in 18/19 with an incredibly bad last two months of that season. Last season he made mistakes in most (or was it all?) of the semi's that we lost. This season he's let in at least three goals off the top of my head just because he's been so weak and scared of contact, one of which knocked us out of the CL. Add in at least another three goals this season he's conceded because he refused to come out for a ball that he 100% should have (there's also been a few others that he perhaps could have but they were a bit riskier).Fair point but there have been other keepers with insane reflexes who didn't regress quite so soon.
I just don't buy that it's a physical or age deterioration with him, just a loss of form. I'd give him another season and see if he recovers or reinvents himself to compensate.
Some here seem to be under the impression that he's been shit for 3 seasons though so i can understand why they want him gone. I just think it's bollocks.
That's on the assumption that DeGea will prioritise staying on 300k + on the bench rather than being closer to his family which seems to have been on the back of his mind for the past 3 years.Some of the nonsense on the Caf makes me embarrassed to even read. Anyone that thinks we could, or would, loan out a 350k a week 30 year old goalkeeper needs to screw their head back on. Same for anyone thinking we can sell DDG as if anyone else is going to fly in with 350k goalkeeper wages. De Gea is here to stay so you may as well stop wasting time with pointless speculation.
When you start a post saying he cost us top 4 i really can't take the rest seriously. Entitled to your opinion but that's clearly just an agenda as if we were fine other than De GeaHe cost us top 4 and a CL spot in 18/19 with an incredibly bad last two months of that season. Last season he made mistakes in most (or was it all?) of the semi's that we lost. This season he's let in at least three goals off the top of my head just because he's been so weak and scared of contact, one of which knocked us out of the CL. Add in at least another three goals this season he's conceded because he refused to come out for a ball that he 100% should have (there's also been a few others that he perhaps could have but they were a bit riskier).
At the start of this season he had seemed to improve a bit over 18/19 and 19/20 (still only up to an 'acceptable' level, nothing more), but after a couple of months he dropped back off and has been poor again since.
Same elements missing from De Gea’s game in his earlier years still missing ten years later. If he’s not got them now and got this far, will he ever?What are the unique characteristics that make improvement impossible in De Gea then?
Van der Sar was 30 when he signed for Fulham for instance. It's not really a great age for a keeper.
Do you remember how bad he was in the final couple of months of that season? For most of the last three seasons he's been average to poor, but during those months he was truly diabolical. He was basically throwing the ball into his own net every second match.When you start a post saying he cost us top 4 i really can't take the rest seriously. Entitled to your opinion but that's clearly just an agenda as if we were fine other than De Gea
It’s a shame, as the season or two before he probably won us at least 10 points.Do you remember how bad he was in the final couple of months of that season? For most of the last three seasons he's been average to poor, but during those months he was truly diabolical. He was basically throwing the ball into his own net every second match.
Maybe putting 100% of the blame was harsh since others weren't playing well either, but he definitely was the most to blame.
Will be overlooked by many big clubs because he's not good enough with his feet. We can dispute whether that should or shouldn't happen, but it absolutely will.I like Henderson (and DDG has been a great GK around 13-17) but dear I say Pope if we can't sign Oblak?
Romero has no future here, doubt he wants one at all after how he's been treated this season. I'd be astounded if he stuck around.Would not be at all surprised if it was neither. I have a feeling Nick Pope is being considered and I wouldn't be sad to see him sign - and let Romero stay as the number two
Agreed - but I can hope! Can't see either DDG or Hendo agreeing to be back-upRomero has no future here, doubt he wants one at all after how he's been treated this season. I'd be astounded if he stuck around.
Nor should they with the promises that have seemingly been made. The club has created its own issues with the GK situation.Agreed - but I can hope! Can't see either DDG or Hendo agreeing to be back-up
An ooverrated pron IMO. Just look at Ederson. Good with his feet but an absolute clown on more than one occasion.Will be overlooked by many big clubs because he's not good enough with his feet. We can dispute whether that should or shouldn't happen, but it absolutely will.
Pisses me off how we’ve treated him tbh. Never put a foot wrong for us, was always fit and ready, never complained, basically a model professional who’s shown twice the loyalty of De Gea and we can’t even have him on the bench.Romero has no future here, doubt he wants one at all after how he's been treated this season. I'd be astounded if he stuck around.
Nick Pope could be a very smart signing if we are not convinced by Henderson and De Gea. He is only 28, as well. You don't have to go for someone ridiculously young again.Would not be at all surprised if it was neither. I have a feeling Nick Pope is being considered and I wouldn't be sad to see him sign - and let Romero stay as the number two