- Joined
- Jan 19, 2013
- Messages
- 48
Zambrotta > NevilleTerrific logic here people. Torres > Messi because he won the WC.
Cannavaro > Terry
Nesta > Rio
Fair enough I would take cole over grosso tbf
Zambrotta > NevilleTerrific logic here people. Torres > Messi because he won the WC.
And what about Portugal, France, Germany, Argentina, Brazils defences in that tournament? They all reached as far if not further than the English players we mentioned. I didnt say they were shit, I just said they werent better than Italys...and history agrees with me.Terry, Cole, Rio & Neville conceding a grand total of 2 goals in 5 games and going out on penalties after a goallesss draw against Portugal in the Quarterfinals means they're shit.
That would be when Nesta, Cannavaro, Grosso, Zambrotta won the WC?Not when we had Ashley Cole, John Terry, Rio Ferdinand, Ledley King, Sol Campbell & Gary Neville all in their prime.
Is @BlueCelery related to Lawro?
And Italy conceded a grand total of 2 goals in 7 games - one of them a freaky own goal and the other after a dive by Malouda. That was a great defence England had, far better than what they have to offer now. But that Italy back-line was sensational - do you remember how well Cannavaro played? He dominated the tournament, was easily its best player and his series of immaculate performances has rarely been matched on a World Cup stage.Terrific logic here people. Torres > Messi because he won the WC.
Terry, Cole, Rio & Neville conceding a grand total of 2 goals in 5 games and going out on penalties after a goallesss draw against Portugal in the Quarterfinals means they're shit.
Thats because he has been injured for a long parts of this season, atleast I hope thats the reason or general ignorance.
De Sciglio is one of, probably the best, young full back in europe.You know as much as I how little that means, he doesn't seem to even get ahead of Abate in a lot of peoples teams here.
Its only in recent times that the Ox has gone out wide, largely due to Arsenal being well stacked with quality centrally and lacking any really pace out wide other than Walcott. He is a central midfielder by trade and a bloody good one.
Rodriguez and Alaba are exactly the same age. They just 2 examples.De Sciglio is one of, probably the best, young full back in europe.
That was a great back 4. England had quality defenders during the Sven era. The front 6 and the mistaken belief that England could play anything but deep-defending, counter-attacking football and compete for 90 minutes against top teams was the problem.Terrific logic here people. Torres > Messi because he won the WC.
Terry, Cole, Rio & Neville conceding a grand total of 2 goals in 5 games and going out on penalties after a goallesss draw against Portugal in the Quarterfinals means they're shit.
Are you sure?Can't wait to see Lawrenson's face when Italy batter them off the pitch, no more than 3 English players would get in the Italian team, there are miles better then England.
Italy have better youngsters then England also so his point is irrelevant
He had a good game. The way the English press reacted to it was ridiculous.It was more than just passing it straight or maybe football isn't understood as well as you by the masses.
Pirlo was the best midfielder on the pitch that day and iam quite confident he will be again when we meet on saturdayHe had a good game. The way the English press reacted to it was ridiculous.
Did you watch Euro 2012?Other than keeper, agree with him, don't forget England have injury's to players like Walcott/Townsend and players like Carrick who haven't even made the squad.
Pirlo's an old fossil, it would be like non-English folk still wanking over Lampard and other than a young Pirlo i see no other Italian I'd really want over an English player.
Veratti's the only other i'd take, but since we have Ox/Wilshere/Barkley in that position I'm not too:-
It's the worst Italian side in years.
Most of Juve fans I know rate him higher than Chiellini.He definitely is better than Bonucci IMO. Outside of his exceptional passing ability Cahill trumps him in everything else.
Juve fans can't stand Bonucci for a reason.
All three are box to box midfielders, Henderson too. England has no controlling midfielder, which is very important in a team.Other than keeper, agree with him, don't forget England have injury's to players like Walcott/Townsend and players like Carrick who haven't even made the squad.
Pirlo's an old fossil, it would be like non-English folk still wanking over Lampard and other than a young Pirlo i see no other Italian I'd really want over an English player.
Veratti's the only other i'd take, but since we have Ox/Wilshere/Barkley in that position I'm not too:-
It's the worst Italian side in years.
Italy's defense on 2006 has been better than any English defense, ever. And that was while Nesta - who has been the best defender in the world at that time and most likely was the best CB on the last decade - got injured on the group stage.What does that have to do with anything? Nesta only played the 3 group games in 06 and Maldini retired in 2002.
I'm taking Neville, JT, Rio, Sol, Cole & co over the defenders you listed any day of the week. England's failure had little to do with them. Our backline usually always performed, it's in other areas we were lacking.
Maybe you never watched football last season? Gerrard played a deeper/holding/controling role for Liverpool last season and a role he'll be playing for England at the World Cup. A role where Rodgers said:-All three are box to box midfielders, Henderson too. England has no controlling midfielder, which is very important in a team.
I don't read the press and I watched that game, he was by some distance the best midfielder out there.He had a good game. The way the English press reacted to it was ridiculous.
True. My Juve-mate says he was a bit shaky at the start of his Juve career, but he turned out to be great.Most of Juve fans I know rate him higher than Chiellini.
Pinging long ball isn't controlling tempo. No wonder Gerard still needs the help of Coutinho/Allen in that dept and the reason he never work well with Lucas.Maybe you never watched football last season? Gerrard played a deeper/holding/controling role for Liverpool last season and a role he'll be playing for England at the World Cup. A role where Rodgers said:-
"There's not many players who can do what he can do – be one of the best attacking midfield players in Europe and then switch to be arguably the best controlling player. You look at the holding players in European football now at the top teams, I wouldn't swap him for any of them, because of what he can give the team."
For all the ring piece licking Pirlo is getting in this thread, he's the same age as Gerrard and has not come off a better season than Gerrard in the same role.
Therefore you have to say Pirlo would not get in England's team over Gerrard.
Wilshere can also play a deeper/holding role.
Have you watched Pirlo this season? He's had another brilliant season, certainly not the best of his career, but then - he's one of the best midfielders of the past 20 years. If you want to whip out some quotes, Pirlo has no shortage of admirers . Obviously Rodgers is going to promote Gerrard by talking nonsense: he's Liverpool's biggest legend and team captain. Gerrard can hit hollywood balls and wins a crunching tackle now and again, and people think he's Platini and Mathauss' combined-clone. His positioning is poor, he doesn't control the match, never had the greatest first touch for a CM. I can't really believe I've had to write a paragraph that Pirlo is better than Gerrard....Maybe you never watched football last season? Gerrard played a deeper/holding/controling role for Liverpool last season and a role he'll be playing for England at the World Cup. A role where Rodgers said:-
"There's not many players who can do what he can do – be one of the best attacking midfield players in Europe and then switch to be arguably the best controlling player. You look at the holding players in European football now at the top teams, I wouldn't swap him for any of them, because of what he can give the team."
For all the ring piece licking Pirlo is getting in this thread, he's the same age as Gerrard and has not come off a better season than Gerrard in the same role.
Therefore you have to say Pirlo would not get in England's team over Gerrard.
Wilshere can also play a deeper/holding role.
Yep, controlled the closing moments brilliantly against Palace.Maybe you never watched football last season? Gerrard played a deeper/holding/controling role for Liverpool last season and a role he'll be playing for England at the World Cup. A role where Rodgers said:-
"There's not many players who can do what he can do – be one of the best attacking midfield players in Europe and then switch to be arguably the best controlling player. You look at the holding players in European football now at the top teams, I wouldn't swap him for any of them, because of what he can give the team."
For all the ring piece licking Pirlo is getting in this thread, he's the same age as Gerrard and has not come off a better season than Gerrard in the same role.
Therefore you have to say Pirlo would not get in England's team over Gerrard.
Wilshere can also play a deeper/holding role.
Wanted to post this but I refused to believe that someone who isn't on WUM is comparing Gerrard to Pirlo. It isn't even close, Pirlo together with Xavi has been the best central midfielder of the last 20 years, while Gerrard while good isn't on that level. Or near that level.Have you watched Pirlo this season? He's had another brilliant season, certainly not the best of his career, but then - he's one of the best midfielders of the past 20 years. If you want to whip out some quotes, Pirlo has no shortage of admirers . Obviously Rodgers is going to promote Gerrard by talking nonsense: he's Liverpool's biggest legend and team captain. Gerrard can hit hollywood balls and wins a crunching tackle now and again, and people think he's Platini and Mathauss' combined-clone. His positioning is poor, he doesn't control the match, never had the greatest first touch for a CM. I can't really believe I've had to write a paragraph that Pirlo is better than Gerrard....
I never seem to understand why some people love to comment on international/foreign football, when they've never heard of most of the players, or haven't watched another league all season. Right now, nobody rates Immobile. In 2 seasons with BVB, everyone will be raving about him without doubt.
Still howling at this!For all the ring piece licking Pirlo is getting in this thread, he's the same age as Gerrard and has not come off a better season than Gerrard in the same role.
Therefore you have to say Pirlo would not get in England's team over Gerrard.
Wilshere can also play a deeper/holding role.
fecking hellStill howling at this!