sallycinnamin
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2013
- Messages
- 3,185
Well done was so close. Well deserved.Thanks mate. Unlucky was a close one.
Well done was so close. Well deserved.Thanks mate. Unlucky was a close one.
Thanks mate. And unlucky.
I might still change Maddison for Rashford.
Thanks, I'm inclined to agree on that front. United site for example annoys me in that they list Amad and Pellistri as midfielders but Antony and Sancho as forwards. Bruno's position varies and for City and Liverpool we've seen Stones and Trent play in both midfield and defence at different points last season.re: feedback, I'd not go that way, how do you define whether a player is a forward or a midfielder or a defender??
For example, a team plays 3 at the back, is a wing back a defender or a midfielder?
Too complicated IMO
You just use a given site. For example, worldfootball.net only ever classifies players as one out of GK, Def, Mid, Fwd.re: feedback, I'd not go that way, how do you define whether a player is a forward or a midfielder or a defender??
For example, a team plays 3 at the back, is a wing back a defender or a midfielder?
Too complicated IMO
That would work though I suspect @Damien would have nightmares checking that every entry was valid!You just use a given site. For example, worldfootball.net only ever classifies players as one out of GK, Def, Mid, Fwd.
So long as everyone uses a common classification/definition all tactical nuances apply to all equally. If there are hidden gems through classification it justly rewards research.
The upside is you spread the picks far more which makes it less likely it becomes a procession (as it did).
Disclaimer: NOT my idea, but I see the merits