Leftback99
Might have a bedwetting fetish.
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2015
- Messages
- 14,710
You seriously believe that squad was 'average' and comparable to what we have now?United under Fergie in his last few years would be the perfect example.
You seriously believe that squad was 'average' and comparable to what we have now?United under Fergie in his last few years would be the perfect example.
I think it was above average but any other manager out there wouldn't have won the league with it. Would Fergie win it with ours right now? No. But he would make sure we would win against all that dross we drop points to nowadays.You seriously believe that squad was 'average' and comparable to what we have now?
No he wouldn't, SAF dropped points against dross even with his best sides, particularly away from home.I think it was above average but any other manager out there wouldn't have won the league with it. Would Fergie win it with ours right now? No. But he would make sure we would win against all that dross we drop points to nowadays.
Nobody expects the same results though. With our spending we however should be able to beat the likes of Wolves and Southampton.No he wouldn't, SAF dropped points against dross even with his best sides, particularly away from home.
Mancini (hardly one of the greatest ever managers) beat SAF to a title. Why? Better players.
We didn't appreciate how good we had it even post 2010 with the likes of Rio, Vidic, Evra, Rooney, Van Persie, Scholes, Carrick, Giggs. We've never replaced them but people expect the same level of results.
Yes they do, that's why there's so much hysteria every time we lose.Nobody expects the same results though. With our spending we however should be able to beat the likes of Wolves and Southampton.
It was better then theirs. Not much as our forward line is abysmal and McTominay is average but still better. The thing is that Hasenhüttl is a very good manager though.Yes they do, that's why there's so much hysteria every time we lose.
We 'should' do but we've absolutely wasted it over the last few years. I looked at yesterday's line ups pre game and agreed with a post that said there really wasn't much difference in quality between the lineups (unless we overrate the likes of McTominay, Mata, Rashford, Lindelof, James, Young, Pereira).
Again, anyone who thinks Jose was the sole or even major problem in the failings of MUFC in recent times is sniffing, smoking or ingesting something a little bit exotic.I am not one to look backwards and in the end things had got to an untenable position and a change was necessary.
But it is correct to say that a significant number of fans blamed Jose for anything and everything.
All I ask for is fairness. Jose is a highly intelligent guy who knew that he was judged by instant results.
He tried to buy more experienced players who would make an instant impact.
Unfortunately it was a lost opportunity for both United and Jose.
So not much like you say, throw in home advantage it evens out even more. McTominay is young and improving but has he proved he's better than the likes of Ward-Prowse or Romeu? Not yet.It was better then theirs. Not much as our forward line is abysmal and McTominay is average but still better. The thing is that Hasenhüttl is a very good manager though.
It plays a part of course, but you are right, it runs much deeper than that.After six years and four different managers, two of which had excellent qualifications, it's pretty obvious that the problem is not the manager.
I think its been quite adventurous at times, still a lot to improve on don't get me wrong but compared to Mourinho's team which was everything you described ponderous etc, its a breath of fresh air. No longer are we seeing slow transitional play. We are not subjected to Matic ambling around or the ball bouncing off Lukaku, its a step forward but there is still work to be done.Is it? The only thing watchable is that the other team is always in the game and that's not a compliment to us either. The football is ponderous, square passing, improvised, few one-twos, it's the same make it up as you go along football like the last manager. We don't really have any of the modern principles that allow us to sustain meaningful possession. Ole needed an addition to his coaching staff over the summer as he doesn't really have it in his locker to coach a playing identity. Pep, Klopp and Poch have really raised he bar on what it takes to excel as a manager in the PL. Winning is now even less about assembling a team better than the competition
So who's to blame then if after half a billion spent the last decade we still field a team not much better than Southampton's?So not much like you say, throw in home advantage it evens out even more. McTominay is young and improving but has he proved he's better than the likes of Ward-Prowse or Romeu? Not yet.
These results aren't surprising whatever manager you put in charge of what we've got.
Based on your views and understanding, I wouldn't trust you to build a Lego house.You haven't a clue about football and how building a team works, that isn't an insult that is an absolute fact basing it off your own comments.
Well it's not Solskjaer.So who's to blame then if after half a billion spent the last decade we still field a team not much better than Southampton's?
So why get rid of Lukaku, Sanchez and Fellaini? Two of whom were very useful for us against the weaker sides in the league.Yes they do, that's why there's so much hysteria every time we lose.
We 'should' do but we've absolutely wasted it over the last few years. I looked at yesterday's line ups pre game and agreed with a post that said there really wasn't much difference in quality between the lineups (unless we overrate the likes of McTominay, Mata, Rashford, Lindelof, James, Young, Pereira).
I thought getting rid of Fellaini, Lukaku and Smalling were mistakes at least in the short term. If they are all on Solskjaer then it's a fair criticism. Appears that they were a lot to do with balancing the books though.So why get rid of Lukaku, Sanchez and Fellaini? Two of whom were very useful for us against the weaker sides in the league.
And the fact that the football was awfulI agree, LVG had a good plan the only thing that failed him was recruitment.
It's not that great now either is it?And the fact that the football was awful
The football was awful, but my god the man himself was entertaining.And the fact that the football was awful
It was, but I think it was down to personelAnd the fact that the football was awful
Still you have to admit 3 in 17 is shocking, and simply not anywhere near good enough for us. He needs a run of wins starting now.Did / Does Rodgers have the same issues of squad rebuild?
Did he go to a club that had been poorly managed for years from the board and football appointments?
When Rodgers has to sell off half his senior squad then try compete, lets see how he does.
We’ve not had close to a best in class manager and/or an at least an emerging one that understands football how it is currently with a relatively successful background.I agree with part of the criticism of Ole, but where do we go now? We've gone down every road:
- Premier League proven manager;
- Master strategist;
- Serial winner;
- Club legend.
So what is it gonna be now? Keep changing managers and hope someday we get one that will magically solve all the underlying problems?
You’ll get decent odds on that happening. Put your house on it.Things will not change in next few months. I think that with Ole it will never change, this what we see now is his maximum but nevermind what i think. My point is that we don't look good and in next 7,8 games we will drop a lot of points. It is just our reality. So now, in international break, board must sit down and decide what to do. Stick with Ole whole season no matter what or to sack him now. Last year we lost CL spot only because we didn't react on time. In october it was obvious that things don't look good and that Mourinho is finished here.
We have time now. Season just started. Sack him now, hire Allegri and lets go with him. I could bet that Allegri would be in top4 with this squad. Maybe not with "super fast attacking free flowing United way" football but it is not that we have that now, isn't it?
Having said that, Ed will wait, we will drop points and in november when our gap will be huge, Ole will be fired and replaced with Carrick until the end of the season.
Yeah, i have nothing against the man personally. He didn't rile me up like Jose.The football was awful, but my god the man himself was entertaining.
I'm not saying it is or it isn't. It's different. The intent from the manager is different. But that's not my point. My point is, is that his poor recruitment wasn't his only downfall.It's not that great now either is it?
Klopps first game in chargeBut you haven't given any examples of top managers doing well with average squads? You haven't proved anything.
Perhaps. And as you said, the poor requirement was down to him, mostly, so that's two things that contributed to his downfall. I have no problem with he man himself, there's just a lot of revisionism with LVG around here sometimes. I mean, we scored 49 goals in his last season. 49 goals. Awful stuff.It was, but I think it was down to personel
See, this is what gets me. How can you word it like that? Totally incompetent?If OGS was in charge of Man City or Liverpool he wouldn't even be close in winning the title.
The man is totally incompetent as a coach.
Didn’t we have 1 clean sheet in the last 19 games?Improvements
Young, hungry squad with likeable players.
New additions looks the part.
We’re devastating on the counter.
James has already equalled Sanchez goal tally in a United shirt.
More solid defensively.
Lots of deadwood/mercenaries cleared out.
Worries
We struggle against teams that sit deep and don’t attack, something we’ve struggled with since Fergie left.
We’re not clinical enough.
We don’t make the most of set pieces.
De Gea’s situation is a concern.
We’re going in the right direction and if Solskjaer can get them to improve our probing and passing in the final 3rd we’ll easily dispatch these teams.