Ole has no system that I can see ..... or do I just need better glasses?

Reapersoul20

Can Anderson score? No.
Joined
Aug 13, 2006
Messages
12,152
Location
Jog on
Tbh the way I see it, unless someone from mainstream media and Cox publishes N number of articles, people will always come to with no tactics, no system posts. That's the way it is.

Not saying everyone is like that but that's how the trend and narratives are set
Spot on.

If you can't see a system in the way Ole is playing football, look more closely.
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,749
Spot on.

If you can't see a system in the way Ole is playing football, look more closely.
Also what he says in his interviews on he wants his team to play is more or less what we see.

He always talks about midfielders going for forward passes quickly, play with pace and directness. Take risks, if we lose possession then we can always win it back. We see more or less same on pitch but with varying success in each game.
 

Grande

Full Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2007
Messages
6,342
Location
The Land of Do-What-You-Will
I’m thankful for this thread as it is one of the more frustrating clichés/myths I have to read over and over, and it comes in the way of real analysis. Latest example Jonathan Liew in The Guardian, who manages to point out all the right facts, just to end up with a completely incongruous conclusion: United have improved this year, Sevilla is in better form re match fitness, Sevilla is a top European team and very well drilled and disciplined, United still show themselves to be a better team, United have a lot of very young and still inconsistent players, United doesn’t yet have quality in depth, United created a lot more than Sevilla, United were too ineffective in finishing positions, Sevilla scored two goals from individual errors by two very young full backs, De Gea otherwise had little to do - conclusion: United have no system or playing style.

Despite the fact that continuous progression see us now able to outplay a very good and disciplined Spanish side in great form for large parts of the match, contain them successfully for most of the rest of the match, all which depends an obvious lot on having annorganized playing style - and what decides the match against us is inconsistency from youth, inconsistent finishing, and lack of options from the bench. All which have very little to do with systems or playing style.

It’s so lazy, and I sometimes wish people who are not capable of recognizing and defining what playing style, system or organization looks in a football team should not be allowed to come with conclusive statements about these matters.
 

Mark Pawelek

New Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2014
Messages
2,598
Location
Kent, near London
To be frank Ole has had system and a long term plan. If we see the recruitment at the junior levels it is quite apparent what he is doing like Ferguson was doing when he arrived at Manchester United. Since now it has become more of a results business he needs players now.

Now I had read somewhere that united had taken a loan which surely we need to spend wisely. (Sancho, Grealish, White) will be good additions for starters who are British (European alternatives always tend to move) which will then help the current core of team. He would need additional 2-3 good transfers and youngsters like Greenwood to come good to build
That's a strategy not a system. Strategy for the long-term. System is for the 90 minutes. I'm happy with the strategy part. I think United lacked systems under LVG too when we couldn't even create chances against teams who sat deep. Also: United's system under Mourinho was rubbish: buy giants and out-muscle opps. There's a synonym for "Ole has no system" = "we just lost another match and I'm fuming".
 

EwanI Ted

Full Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2018
Messages
1,755
The fact he shits himself when having to make a substitution before the 85 minute mark is a big problem. Maybe the system he has in mind would be better seen if when a player isn't having the best game, he's willing to make the change, with enough time to see it work.
This is how many times we've made substitutions post lockdown by time (can't be arsed going back more than that)

Under 60 minutes - 5 times
60 to 70 minutes - 16 times
70 to 80 minutes - 17 times
80 to 90 minutes - 17 times
90+ minutes - 4 times

Really doesn't suggest he's unwilling to make subs until late in the game.
 

Garethw

scored 25-30 goals a season as a right footed RW
Joined
Feb 7, 2005
Messages
17,007
Location
England:
A good coach needs to be adaptive to a given situation. With Ole we only have a singular way of playing. If it doesn’t work then we are usually stuffed.
 

rotherham_red

Full Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2005
Messages
7,410
Tbh the way I see it, unless someone from mainstream media and Cox publishes N number of articles, people will always come to with no tactics, no system posts. That's the way it is.

Not saying everyone is like that but that's how the trend and narratives are set
Sheep, that is what they are... *coming from afar* (sorry, couldn't resist ;) )
 

rotherham_red

Full Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2005
Messages
7,410
A good coach needs to be adaptive to a given situation. With Ole we only have a singular way of playing. If it doesn’t work then we are usually stuffed.
Did you even read the articles in the OP? They categorically state that he's adapted and played in numerous ways, and have the media embedded within them to prove it.
 

Skåre Willoch

Full Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
4,226
This is usually how we end up when facing low blocks and/or organized defenses.


Bruno centrally just outside the 18 yard line, with Martial lurking just on the 18 yards line, whether it's from the center, from the left or from the right.

Rashford is on the left, with the left back coming in either outside or slightly deeper inside to help recycle the ball or create an overlap.
The same with Mason and Aaron on the right.

Pogba plays slightly deeper than Bruno, and is usually more open because of this. Helps keep possession, recycles the ball well, and when getting the ball has plenty of options with Bruno usually facing him to set up one-twos with either him or Martial. Martial usually starts running in behind/through their central defense from either side or center, Mason cutting inside or towards the goal line, and Rashford the same.

There's always a plethora of options, but given the very tight space to navigate for all players, the margins are very slim. You can see us trying to go through their defense using all players involved multiple times per game, and it works quite well I reckon. With more experience and a better squad, we're going to score for fun in many games this coming season.

Matic is positioned centrally, between the 18 yard box and the midfield. He's available for passing, pressing, and is key to this whole system working the way it does. His cool head and him not being tempted to push even further up or get out of position gives us defensive solidity, and he's also a decent passer. We do need someone with quicker feet and probably a better shot as well, though. Tonali is mentioned, as is Koopmeiners.


The system is there, clearly. This has worked out well for us time and time again since Brunos arrival. Even against Sevilla and København. We created plenty, but were let down by poor finishing and/or godlike goalkeeping.

The system is also set up for the right players to come in and do a job, and has severely exposed which players aren't good enough.
Grealish would work very well on both the left and centrally in this, and nevermind Sancho. He would love playing like this, it really suits his style of play, and he could do a job basically anywhere on offense in this setup. Andreas and Jesse? Not so much. They don't have time on the ball and have to be quick on their feet, quick in their heads, and be very precise with their passing. Not suited, not good enough, simple as.
Mata works to some extent due to his intelligence and passing ability (as seen against FCK), but he simply is't quick enough to do a good enough job against almost any decent side anymore, sadly.
 

Crashoutcassius

Full Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2013
Messages
10,320
Location
playa del carmen
I think mostly the 'he has no system' rubbish just comes from lads that only see extreme systems and only once they are pointed out 15,000 times in mainstream media, like geigenpress or tiki taka. it doesn't become a 'system' until it gets a name in fifa
 

devips

Full Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2011
Messages
1,233
"Ole has no system that I can see."

Get a new pair of specs. Simple.
 

TrustInJanuzaj

'Liverpool are a proper club'
Joined
Mar 26, 2015
Messages
10,727
Now that you've mentioned it, how would you describe a CB panicking when he's got the ball at his feet though?

Everytime he's got the ball with an opposition player that's within the 10m radius of Maguire, I start to panic because of just how slow and lumbering he is.
But there’s literally no reason to panic as Maguire doesn’t really ever give the call away cheaply. He’s got the same qualities as Matic in that they both use their bodies well and put it between man and ball and can use strength to hold off attackers. Now if you said Smalling I’d understand it, he is technically a mess but Maguire isn’t, good control, crisp passing and he’s not even that bad at beating a man if push comes to shove. I think he alongside Shaw are our best defenders by far when it comes to press resistance so I don’t know why you feel nervous in that department.
 

Paul_Scholes18

Full Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2014
Messages
13,891
"Ole has no system that I can see."

Get a new pair of specs. Simple.
Not a great system or say a title winning one. I like direct football and we try to do that, but we struggle against really compact defenses.
We also struggle to keep possesion when needed in games.
 

Garethw

scored 25-30 goals a season as a right footed RW
Joined
Feb 7, 2005
Messages
17,007
Location
England:
Did you even read the articles in the OP? They categorically state that he's adapted and played in numerous ways, and have the media embedded within them to prove it.
I go by what I see with my own two eyes mate. If plan A doesn’t work we struggle massively.
 

AshRK

Full Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2017
Messages
12,192
Location
Canada
Not a great system or say a title winning one. I like direct football and we try to do that, but we struggle against really compact defenses.
We also struggle to keep possesion when needed in games.
People expected us to struggle against Sevilla's pressing and thought we would have no sniff off the ball but we literally dominated them bar our finishing. Had we won that game many Ole doubters would have also praised him. I feel he is the most trolled and underrated manager. Some jist don't want to give him a chance as a manager because all they can think is this man failed at cardiff.
 

devips

Full Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2011
Messages
1,233
It's so unfortunate that our manager's name is not Ole Klopp Guardiola. We could have gone to town with that name.
 

RedRonaldo

Wishes to be oppressed.
Joined
Aug 17, 2003
Messages
18,996
Maguire "looks" composed and not panicking all the time, I'll give him that, but this doesn't mean he's fantastic on the ball and he's keeping the ball well. How many times have we seen him stop the ball, think for a few seconds, and pass it straight to the opponents? Almost every other game, and also don't forget this:
This is actually funny to watch, even Pogba wouldn't overdo something like that at the back. Instead of keeping it simple, he just keep thinking and thinking and keeping and running around slowly with ball, before giving it away cheaply.
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,713
Either the players are fundamentally good enough, or they're not. If they're not, they need to be replaced or you put up with substandard players. Not sure what other options exist.



If there had been a world class, pacy, left footed centre back on the market that we'd ignored in order to buy Maguire then that might been a mistake, but I dont recall there being one. You can only buy what's on the market, which means sometimes you buy people in the "wrong" order. That's why it takes time and patience to fully build a new team.
There are two ways a manager can build a great defence

A- he can add WC defenders to it.
B- He can engage into a deep analysis of what he's got and he buys players that compliment the defence accordingly. A classic example of Juventus CL winner of the 95-96. The defence was hardly spectacular (Porrini, Ferrara, Pessotto Vierchowood) but together they were rock solid

Sir Alex was blessed with 3 spectacular CBs two of which could easily be among the top 3 CBs in EPL history. However that wasn't the thought back in the day. Stam was a young CB from PSV. His attributes were spectacular but he was far from a safe bet and the fee we paid for him was considered ridiculous by many Italian critics back in the day. He was paired with Johnsen a Norwegian CB we bought from Besiktas. Meanwhile Rio was bought just 2 years after Sir Alex had ridiculed his transfer fee when he signed for Leeds while Vidic was a guy who was playing in Russia and who was set to sign for Fiorentina. TBH the only proven CB I can think off that Sir Alex bought with the sole intention of going there and immediately become the defence leader was Blanc.

United's defence prior Maguire lacked pace and leadership + was filled with right footed CBs. Spending 80m on pretty much a slight upgrade over Lindelof was silly irrespective how you tackle it. We need to move past buying safe often British players on silly money and look at players like Gabriel (rumoured at 30m), VDB (40M), Achraf (30-35m) and co.
 

Goku23

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 16, 2018
Messages
211
Can someone help me out please (dont know where else to post) but there is threads on here that says I have insifficiant privilages to post and also im limited to 3 a day what do I need to do to get said priviliges ? Its doing my head in now thanks in advance for the help :)
 

Paul_Scholes18

Full Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2014
Messages
13,891
People expected us to struggle against Sevilla's pressing and thought we would have no sniff off the ball but we literally dominated them bar our finishing. Had we won that game many Ole doubters would have also praised him. I feel he is the most trolled and underrated manager. Some jist don't want to give him a chance as a manager because all they can think is this man failed at cardiff.
We had some great periods in the game, but struggled before they scored the equalizer to keep the ball.
I think he deserve praise for the attacking performance at the start of both halves. Sadly we could not keep it up.
 

AshRK

Full Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2017
Messages
12,192
Location
Canada
We had some great periods in the game, but struggled before they scored the equalizer to keep the ball.
I think he deserve praise for the attacking performance at the start of both halves. Sadly we could not keep it up.
Sevilla are a solid side and it is not easy to just dominate them for 90 minutes. To be fair I was surprised we were able to attack them the way we did. I don't remember if we ever dominated a spanish side in a match. The point is had we won Ole would have received a lot of praise but we lost undeservingly and we hear loads of nonsense again how he is an average manager, just a PE teacher etc. etc.
 

Paul_Scholes18

Full Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2014
Messages
13,891
Sevilla are a solid side and it is not easy to just dominate them for 90 minutes. To be fair I was surprised we were able to attack them the way we did. I don't remember if we ever dominated a spanish side in a match. The point is had we won Ole would have received a lot of praise but we lost undeservingly and we hear loads of nonsense again how he is an average manager, just a PE teacher etc. etc.
I agree it was great to see our attack at the start of the second half. All over them and probably something we talked about in the break. Should have scored at least a goal from those chances.
Once we got tired though we should have changed things around. More possesion and maybe used some subs. Mata, Matic, Ighalo etc and maybe even considered Lingard.
Rashford and Greenwood looked off for sure and Martial was not at his very best either.
 

AshRK

Full Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2017
Messages
12,192
Location
Canada
I agree it was great to see our attack at the start of the second half. All over them and probably something we talked about in the break. Should have scored at least a goal from those chances.
Once we got tired though we should have changed things around. More possesion and maybe used some subs. Mata, Matic, Ighalo etc and maybe even considered Lingard.
Rashford and Greenwood looked off for sure and Martial was not at his very best either.
Absolutely that's a fair criticism of Ole. He has to trust his squad players more. I felt mata could have been subbed on much earlier and replaced with Rashford and I would have also taken Fred off and replaced him with Ighalo once we were behind.
 

Paul778

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2017
Messages
1,189
Location
London
I really really really tire of threads like this. I've been supporting Utd over 40 years. but people on here have such short memories - they can't remember the dross we were served up a few years back.

Before Ole arrived:
  • we played boring keep-ball football under LVG and boring defensive football under Jose
  • we had a huge amount of in fighting inside the club
  • we signed lots of random players that didn't fit the teams playing style or didn't have the correct spirit/drive to wear the shirt
LVG and Jose both had systems and both were dire.

Since Ole arrived:
  • Games are exciting to watch again.
  • The players are playing for the team and leave everything on the field (even Martial!)
  • Ole has managed to get rid of a lot of the deadwood and bad seeds within the club
  • Ole has made a series of good signings. They might not all be world beaters and we may have paid over the odds for some of them but Maguire, AWB, Bruno have all significantly improved our starting eleven. James is a work in progress and was always expected to be.
I really think most of the people on this forum forget the football we were playing 2015-2018. Sometimes we'd get the odd good result but blimey - the football was sleep inducing.

People cry at Ole because:
  • He has no plan in game
  • He can't use his subs
  • Our team squander possession in game
Man Utd are the definition of a team in transition. There are still a lot of players that need to go, a lot of squad depth to build and more time spent in (a somewhat shorter) preseason getting the players to gel together and work things out in training. I don't think he's one of the best managers in the world granted, but he's a great fit for what we need right now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sultan

Lennon7

nipple flasher and door destroyer
Joined
May 8, 2013
Messages
10,476
Location
M5
I really really really tire of threads like this. I've been supporting Utd over 40 years. but people on here have such short memories - they can't remember the dross we were served up a few years back.

Before Ole arrived:
  • we played boring keep-ball football under LVG and boring defensive football under Jose
  • we had a huge amount of in fighting inside the club
  • we signed lots of random players that didn't fit the teams playing style or didn't have the correct spirit/drive to wear the shirt
LVG and Jose both had systems and both were dire.

Since Ole arrived:
  • Games are exciting to watch again.
  • The players are playing for the team and leave everything on the field (even Martial!)
  • Ole has managed to get rid of a lot of the deadwood and bad seeds within the club
  • Ole has made a series of good signings. They might not all be world beaters and we may have paid over the odds for some of them but Maguire, AWB, Bruno have all significantly improved our starting eleven. James is a work in progress and was always expected to be.
I really think most of the people on this forum forget the football we were playing 2015-2018. Sometimes we'd get the odd good result but blimey - the football was sleep inducing.

People cry at Ole because:
  • He has no plan in game
  • He can't use his subs
  • Our team squander possession in game
Man Utd are the definition of a team in transition. There are still a lot of players that need to go, a lot of squad depth to build and more time spent in (a somewhat shorter) preseason getting the players to gel together and work things out in training. I don't think he's one of the best managers in the world granted, but he's a great fit for what we need right now.
Excellent post mate and all completely true. Ole is an excellent man manager - before Ole players were giving up in games, throwing strops, in the news for the wrong reasons. He’s completely changed the mentality but we really need a few world class players to compete again.
 

romufc

Full Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2019
Messages
12,557
I really really really tire of threads like this. I've been supporting Utd over 40 years. but people on here have such short memories - they can't remember the dross we were served up a few years back.

Before Ole arrived:
  • we played boring keep-ball football under LVG and boring defensive football under Jose
  • we had a huge amount of in fighting inside the club
  • we signed lots of random players that didn't fit the teams playing style or didn't have the correct spirit/drive to wear the shirt
LVG and Jose both had systems and both were dire.

Since Ole arrived:
  • Games are exciting to watch again.
  • The players are playing for the team and leave everything on the field (even Martial!)
  • Ole has managed to get rid of a lot of the deadwood and bad seeds within the club
  • Ole has made a series of good signings. They might not all be world beaters and we may have paid over the odds for some of them but Maguire, AWB, Bruno have all significantly improved our starting eleven. James is a work in progress and was always expected to be.
I really think most of the people on this forum forget the football we were playing 2015-2018. Sometimes we'd get the odd good result but blimey - the football was sleep inducing.

People cry at Ole because:
  • He has no plan in game
  • He can't use his subs
  • Our team squander possession in game
Man Utd are the definition of a team in transition. There are still a lot of players that need to go, a lot of squad depth to build and more time spent in (a somewhat shorter) preseason getting the players to gel together and work things out in training. I don't think he's one of the best managers in the world granted, but he's a great fit for what we need right now.

I am afraid we are in this situation where the fan group is so divided. There is a portion of fans on twitter who are ole out regardless of what happens. Why? No idea.

There are fans who are completely deluded and say "we are manutd.. we cant be finishing this, we cant have a manager like this". I am sorry but who gave us the divine right to win things? What fans need to get in their head, this is 2020 football not 2010. We have to fight for victories and titles.

The issues I have with the tactics is that, they all say Ole has one way and cant change, then they say he has no system? well which one is it?

We have played counter attacking football and done well, recently we have played balanced football and done well.

Ole has had to work with 3 teams this season. He started off with a team that looked good started well, worked on it all pre season. Pogba, Martial, Shaw get injured. 3 key players which threw all his plans out the window.

We need a run of games with the first 11 and then take it from there.

The problem with fans is they are reactionary, a few bad games, the player is championship standard, a few good games, Ronaldo standard. We need to calm down and take a broader view at things.
 

POF

Full Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2014
Messages
3,798
There are two ways a manager can build a great defence

A- he can add WC defenders to it.
B- He can engage into a deep analysis of what he's got and he buys players that compliment the defence accordingly. A classic example of Juventus CL winner of the 95-96. The defence was hardly spectacular (Porrini, Ferrara, Pessotto Vierchowood) but together they were rock solid

Sir Alex was blessed with 3 spectacular CBs two of which could easily be among the top 3 CBs in EPL history. However that wasn't the thought back in the day. Stam was a young CB from PSV. His attributes were spectacular but he was far from a safe bet and the fee we paid for him was considered ridiculous by many Italian critics back in the day. He was paired with Johnsen a Norwegian CB we bought from Besiktas. Meanwhile Rio was bought just 2 years after Sir Alex had ridiculed his transfer fee when he signed for Leeds while Vidic was a guy who was playing in Russia and who was set to sign for Fiorentina. TBH the only proven CB I can think off that Sir Alex bought with the sole intention of going there and immediately become the defence leader was Blanc.

United's defence prior Maguire lacked pace and leadership + was filled with right footed CBs. Spending 80m on pretty much a slight upgrade over Lindelof was silly irrespective how you tackle it. We need to move past buying safe often British players on silly money and look at players like Gabriel (rumoured at 30m), VDB (40M), Achraf (30-35m) and co.
Very strange conclusion.

Stam was clearly signed to be the defensive leader. The transfer fee was huge at the time and it was clear that he was brought in to replace Pallister as the defensive leader.

Rio was also clearly signed as a long term leader of the defence and future captain. He never really managed either but after a great spell at Leeds where he was made captain Fergie saw that leadership in him.

Vidic is probably the one not signed to be the leader but was the best defensive leader I've seen at United.

Overall, if you spend a record fee on a centre back, it's got to be with the intention that they will lead the defence.
 

MadDogg

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
15,972
Location
Manchester Utd never lose, just run out of time
a- you don't spend 80m on a slow right footed CB when most of your CBs are right footed CBs and slow
That's not completely accurate. Bailly is fast. Smalling is fast, albeit perhaps shouldn't be counted since we then loaned him out. Tuanzebe is quite fast. Even Jones has decent pace. Lindelof was our slowest centreback and even he isn't actually slow, moreso just average. Obviously Maguire himself is slow though.

Our first choice of Lindelof and Maguire together is too slow of a partnership, especially when we want to play a high line. But 'most' of our centrebacks aren't.
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,713
That's not completely accurate. Bailly is fast. Smalling is fast, albeit perhaps shouldn't be counted since we then loaned him out. Tuanzebe is quite fast. Even Jones has decent pace. Lindelof was our slowest centreback and even he isn't actually slow, moreso just average. Obviously Maguire himself is slow though.

Our first choice of Lindelof and Maguire together is too slow of a partnership, especially when we want to play a high line. But 'most' of our centrebacks aren't.
Jones and Bailly are injury prone, Tuanzebe is a kid while Smalling was never given a fair chance to become Maguire's partner. It was evident that Lindelof would have become Ole's choice as Maguire's partner.

Which is a shame really. I still believe that Smalling is a far better partner for Slab head then Lindelof is.
 

MadDogg

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
15,972
Location
Manchester Utd never lose, just run out of time
Which is a shame really. I still believe that Smalling is a far better partner for Slab head then Lindelof is.
I certainly expect it'd be a better partnership defensively and do wonder if it would be better overall than Maguire-Lindelof. I wish we'd given it a chance to see how they would go.

However I did see somebody else make a good point a while back. Having Smalling and AWB on the same side of the defence could be a real recipe for trouble. We can probably get away with one of them, but having both of them together could be somewhat of a black hole of ball-playing ability. We'd become very predictable when playing out of the back as everything would have to go through Maguire and Shaw on the left.
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,713
Very strange conclusion.

Stam was clearly signed to be the defensive leader. The transfer fee was huge at the time and it was clear that he was brought in to replace Pallister as the defensive leader.

Rio was also clearly signed as a long term leader of the defence and future captain. He never really managed either but after a great spell at Leeds where he was made captain Fergie saw that leadership in him.

Vidic is probably the one not signed to be the leader but was the best defensive leader I've seen at United.

Overall, if you spend a record fee on a centre back, it's got to be with the intention that they will lead the defence.
Stam was a CB bought from PSV. He never played outside of Holland and he had just 1 Dutch league under his belt . We had a certain Schmeichel, Irwin and Keane back then with Johnsen doing well during the previous year. So no Stam was not brought to be our defensive leader. He earned that role. We bought him because of his immense potential and his characteristics. In fact I think that Stam was the most complete CB Sir Alex ever had.

Rio was slightly more experienced having played in the EPL which included a successful CL run. However he was far from the safe WC bet he became later on. Just 2 years before Sir Alex ridiculed Leeds for spending 18m for him, claiming that Wes was worth twice the price.

We bought Vidic at the 11th hour. In fact Fiorentina was so close in signing him that they considered suing us for snapping him under their nose. That's how close he was from signing with them

All these players were bought purely because of the characteristics they brought to the team which fitted perfectly to what we needed at the time. As you said, if you spend a record fee on a centre back then the intention is to lead or even drag the defence to a highly ridiculously level. I can't see that happening with Maguire.
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,713
I certainly expect it'd be a better partnership defensively and do wonder if it would be better overall than Maguire-Lindelof. I wish we'd given it a chance to see how they would go.

However I did see somebody else make a good point a while back. Having Smalling and AWB on the same side of the defence could be a real recipe for trouble. We can probably get away with one of them, but having both of them together could be somewhat of a black hole of ball-playing ability. We'd become very predictable when playing out of the back as everything would have to go through Maguire and Shaw on the left.
I was 100% certain that that was going to be our CB duo and honestly I still think it should. Smalling has his weaknesses but he won't be pushed aside or be beaten on air like Lindelof is. He's also rapid. I was expecting Maguire to act as the ball playing CB with Smalling closing gaps. Its far from perfection of course but I still think he's a better partner for Maguire then Lindelof is.
 

He'sRaldo

Full Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2019
Messages
3,203
Every manager will have a set of ideas or a 'system', but the degree to which they can understand and implement their ideas separates the best from the rest. An idea isn't good in and of itself, it's implementation needs to be considered as well.

At the end of the day, proof will be in the pudding next season. Will Ole have an overachieving system like most top managers have? If our trust in Ole's system is that great, then why not set the bar high.
 

monosierra

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
374
Zidane doesn't have a fixed system or philosophy per se but he has a stronger squad and a better sense of when and how to use his players. He also boasts the aura of a world football legend.

What I'm curious about is drilling and coaching. I remember Mourinho and Van Gaal's staff being strong on these two behind-the-scenes. How are we doing now?
 

SteveW

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2013
Messages
7,194
I don't even get what people mean when they say this to be honest.

We've a really clear way of playing that we use in pretty much every game. The galaxy brain posters on here struggle to see it somehow.
 

romufc

Full Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2019
Messages
12,557
Zidane doesn't have a fixed system or philosophy per se but he has a stronger squad and a better sense of when and how to use his players. He also boasts the aura of a world football legend.

What I'm curious about is drilling and coaching. I remember Mourinho and Van Gaal's staff being strong on these two behind-the-scenes. How are we doing now?
It is good you mentioned that. The funny thing is I keep hearing people talk about inexperienced coaching at United. Jose appointed Carrick and Mckenna as his staff too. So now, under Ole they are not good enough and inexperienced.

yet, when Arteta was appointed assistant to Pep, he is brilliant and is a fantastic coach.
 

The Irish Connection

Full Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2017
Messages
2,345
It has to be said, we played brilliant stuff 15 minutes either side of half time against Sevilla, but after 60 minutes our forward players stopped making runs off the ball. When you watch Liverpool and city, when they play well, their front 3 or 4 players are always moving.
Whether that’s a fitness thing I don’t know but it’s as important as system.
 

sp_107

New Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Messages
2,367
Location
Yorkshire
He's got a system

a- Pace and trickery upfront with striker and inside forwards constantly swapping roles
b- Bruno and Pogba spraying through balls to the forward line
c- A dedicated DM to keep everything together
d- a strong defence focused on defending

That doesn't mean he doesn't make mistakes

a- you don't spend 80m on a slow right footed CB when most of your CBs are right footed CBs and slow
b- you don't spend ridiculous amount of money on players mostly based on nationality when you've got such a huge rebuild at hand.
c- Natural LBs who are fit week in week out are important. Buy one.

There seems to be this notion with United that we'd rather struggle then not buying/giving 2nd/3rd/4th chance to British players. It seems like we owe the British national sides something. Its crazy.
Excellent post. I do believe Ole got not just one but few systems in his head and he is capable of playing those based on the situation and having right players for that.

He has already proved himself that he is not a one tricky pony by playing just counter attacking football and he can adapt different systems based on the quality of players he got in his hands.

I stopped worrying about our style if play many months back and if one quality player like Bruno can change that, imagine what happens if he signs 3/4 other quality players so I trust Ole on this.

As you said, he can improve a lot by bringing in "value to money" players like Zakaria, Saul, Upamecano rather drowning in British talent channel and sucked into paying high premiums.