Ole's clear-out

Joined
May 22, 2017
Messages
13,122
Jones had everything required of a great centre back or defensive midfielder but he was very unlucky with injuries in his early days with us, but later he became accident prone on the pitch and made some horrendous mistakes, especially when paired with Smalling who, with other partners was very good. As for Moyes, I cant really believe Fergie let us be saddled with him....they must have been at the same Hogmannay party lol!
I agree ref Jones. It’s a shame he will be remembered as a meme. Like you say, he had everything to be a great CB, and I’ve not seen anyone at aged 19 (certainly not in the PL), who has been a better prospect since.

god knows ref Moyes.
 

CM

Full Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2014
Messages
7,387
This has been a massively underrated aspect of what Solskjaer has done here. He's quietly got rid of many players accrued under previous managers who didn't have the ability and/or mentality to play for us.

It's a far cry from when Young, Fellaini and Lukaku were 3 of the first names on the teamsheet.
 

Alemar

Full Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2017
Messages
7,617
Phase one
Romero
J. Pereira
Rojo
Jones
Fosu-Mensah
A.Pereira
Lingard
Ighalo

Phase two
Dalot
Williams
Mata?
 

sunama

Baghdad Bob
Joined
Apr 26, 2014
Messages
16,839
Grtat news as he really wasnt good enough. Should have let Lingard go as well instead of extending. Periera and Jones need to be persuaded to go as well. Still cant get my head around who gave Jones a 5 year contract :mad:
Matt Judge.
He is E.Woodward's mate and is terrible at his job.
Imagine paying Phil Jones to be on a treatment table.
Complete incompetence.
 
Joined
May 22, 2017
Messages
13,122
Phase one
Romero
J. Pereira
Rojo
Jones
Fosu-Mensah
A.Pereira
Lingard
Ighalo

Phase two
Dalot
Williams
Mata?
Everyone on your Phase 1 needs to go. Disagree with your Phase 2. Dalot needs to go, and frankly should be phase one. If Milan or anyone else offered money for him in Jan he should be gone.

williams should go on loan, and can be a good squad player at the least.

Mata - I think should stay, he’s a good squad player, and can do a job. Perhaps his wage is high, but his transfer fee is a sunk cost, so if we are getting 20 appearances from him, it’s ok. I wouldn’t put up a fight for him to stay though.
 

Bojan11

Full Member
Joined
May 16, 2010
Messages
33,113
And better than many of his signings. We still can’t get rid of Rojo, 7 years later.
It is crazy that he’s been here that long.

Same with Jones being the only outfield player from Fergies period that is left.
 

MileStolar

Full Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2019
Messages
827
Location
Vancouver, Canada
Ole has done pretty well in building up the current squad, it's no doubt for me our best since Fergie retired and by far better than the squad that finished 2nd 3 years ago.

But it's now really the time this squad wins something. They are good enough to defeat big teams, challenge for the league and progress in the cups. The only thing remaining is them winning something big.
It's only been a year that we've got cohesive squad without too much tinkering. We used to start Mata, Pereira and Lingard this time last year.
He's still ensembleing the squad and we're far from finished article. We have one of the youngest squads in the league and most of our oldest players are on their last legs. Lots of our players are still green and are expected to ripen in the next two years.

It is crucial that we stick with what we're doing now as we're changing for the better and we mustn't stop this and start all over as that would probably waste so much potential that this squad has.

If we try clear more of fringe players in the next couple of windows and if we manage to reinforce properly and our young players enter their prime that's our best chance of winning something and making a comeback as a club.

We have to stay patient with Ole and entourage.
 

city-puma

Full Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
3,279
Location
NYC
Your wish was granted, he managed to zombify the team.
Well, definitely not a team of zombies, because it would at least frighten the opponents. It’s more like a team of the wood-made chess pieces. Some can only move one step forward each time. Some are only allowed to move in diagonal...
 

el3mel

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2016
Messages
43,735
Location
Egypt
It's only been a year that we've got cohesive squad without too much tinkering. We used to start Mata, Pereira and Lingard this time last year.
He's still ensembleing the squad and we're far from finished article. We have one of the youngest squads in the league and most of our oldest players are on their last legs. Lots of our players are still green and are expected to ripen in the next two years.

It is crucial that we stick with what we're doing now as we're changing for the better and we mustn't stop this and start all over as that would probably waste so much potential that this squad has.

If we try clear more of fringe players in the next couple of windows and if we manage to reinforce properly and our young players enter their prime that's our best chance of winning something and making a comeback as a club.

We have to stay patient with Ole and entourage.
I honestly don't know what does "start all over" mean. Do people think that if say one manager leaves and the next arrives, he has to throw everything the previous one did out of the window before starting his job? I'm not saying Ole should leave (obviously not, he's done well at the moment and our comeback since the CL exit has been great) but I'm just talking in perspective. Things don't work like this in any club at all. The current squad should be built in a way that would work under any manager, the current or any upcoming one. That's the basis big clubs work on.

IMO we are pretty much finished article apart from one or two players. Most of the squad are either in their prime or pretty close to approach it. If you ask me what's the perfect time for these players to win something, I would say now and within the next 2 years max. They are showing it already, considering that we have reached a lot of semi finals and are currently on a possible title run. They are just missing one thing and that's taking one step forward to win it all.

I feel like some are afraid to say that we are finally good enough for a title challenge and are trying to control expectations so that they aren't disappointed if something went south. We absolutely are and are already showing it. The current squad is good enough to challenge for the big prizes.
 

Ace

Full Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2008
Messages
4,384
Location
Colorado
I had almost entirely forgotten about Memphis Depay until reading his name on this thread.
 

NoPace

Full Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2014
Messages
9,419
This is the actual case for sticking with Ole. The only guy he's playing that he should bin is Matic, and he's at least only at half of Fred and Mctominay's minutes.

They should all have gone to others (Van De Beek even if it means trying to win 4-3 for 80% and 3 at the back for the others, largely Telles at LB and Shaw at LCB but some to Axel or Bailly and maybe a few others to AWB at RB and James at RWB), but considering we are one holding midfielder short it's not inexcusable.
 

NoPace

Full Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2014
Messages
9,419
I honestly don't know what does "start all over" mean. Do people think that if say one manager leaves and the next arrives, he has to throw everything the previous one did out of the window before starting his job? I'm not saying Ole should leave (obviously not, he's done well at the moment and our comeback since the CL exit has been great) but I'm just talking in perspective. Things don't work like this in any club at all. The current squad should be built in a way that would work under any manager, the current or any upcoming one. That's the basis big clubs work on.

IMO we are pretty much finished article apart from one or two players. Most of the squad are either in their prime or pretty close to approach it. If you ask me what's the perfect time for these players to win something, I would say now and within the next 2 years max. They are showing it already, considering that we have reached a lot of semi finals and are currently on a possible title run. They are just missing one thing and that's taking one step forward to win it all.

I feel like some are afraid to say that we are finally good enough for a title challenge and are trying to control expectations so that they aren't disappointed if something went south. We absolutely are and are already showing it. The current squad is good enough to challenge for the big prizes.
Yeah, Ole can be the guy who gets us into a position to hire the next manager and there's no shame in that. Depends on who's available and if their tactics fit the squad. And Ole could get a job running things or leave if he likes, could always bring him back honestly I think if we say hired Nagelsmann this summer, Ole would get a decent but not top top job, like maybe what Newcastle or maybe Leicester if they lose Rodgers or a 5th-7th placed team in Germany or like Celtic?
 

Icemav

Full Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2016
Messages
1,697
Still think that OGS would make a good Director of Football.
That is a really really interesting idea. Some people question his tactics on the pitch but he seems to be helping to steer the club in a much healthier direction.
 

Maureen-yo

Full Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2016
Messages
828
Location
London
I honestly don't know what does "start all over" mean. Do people think that if say one manager leaves and the next arrives, he has to throw everything the previous one did out of the window before starting his job? I'm not saying Ole should leave (obviously not, he's done well at the moment and our comeback since the CL exit has been great) but I'm just talking in perspective. Things don't work like this in any club at all. The current squad should be built in a way that would work under any manager, the current or any upcoming one. That's the basis big clubs work on.

IMO we are pretty much finished article apart from one or two players. Most of the squad are either in their prime or pretty close to approach it. If you ask me what's the perfect time for these players to win something, I would say now and within the next 2 years max. They are showing it already, considering that we have reached a lot of semi finals and are currently on a possible title run. They are just missing one thing and that's taking one step forward to win it all.

I feel like some are afraid to say that we are finally good enough for a title challenge and are trying to control expectations so that they aren't disappointed if something went south. We absolutely are and are already showing it. The current squad is good enough to challenge for the big prizes.
The issue here for me is still squad depth. We are one injury away (Bruno or Rashford) from having a team devoid of a spark or any creativity. How many of the goals this season have come through one of those two scoring or assisting? IMO we need to strengthen in the summer with a RW (if pellestri/Diallo don’t step up by then), a “jack grealish” type player and a proper DM to remove the dependency on two makeshift DMs, McT and Fred, in every game. Essentially replace Pogba with quality if he goes and get a proper replacement for Matic in the mould of Rodri, Busquets etc
 

Volumiza

The alright "V", B-Boy cypher cat
Joined
Jul 13, 2018
Messages
13,552
Location
Somewhere in the middle
He’s doing what Jose and LVG were too short term to attempt.
He is and regardless of any question marks over his overall management Incan only say that in this respect he’s done and seems to be doing an exemplary job. We have a completely renovated team. Still a bit of work to do but so much better than the jumble of Moyes, LVG and Jose he inherited.
 

AltiUn

likes playing with swords after fantasies
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
23,623
Phase one
Romero
J. Pereira
Rojo
Jones
Fosu-Mensah
A.Pereira
Lingard
Ighalo

Phase two
Dalot
Williams
Mata?
I’d argue phase one was Smalling, Lukaku, Sanchez, Young, Darmian, Valencia and Fellaini.
 

2 man midfield

Last Man Standing finalist 2021/22
Joined
Sep 4, 2012
Messages
46,054
Location
?
Van Gaal got rid of loads of players - Rafael, Nani, Evans, Welbeck... Unfortunately he got rid of ones who were better than some of the ones he kept.
Maybe go Google who those managers removed. Your talking like they kept everyone. I mean LVG had a big clear out.
I wouldn’t class what Van Gaal did as the same as what Ole is doing. To me he just seemed like a mad bastard with a scatter gun approach to transfers. There was no cohesion or planning to it. He’d sign players we didn’t really need like Falcao and end up playing with a top heavy team just to fit him in. We used to have Di Maria, Rooney, Falcao and Van Persie all on the pitch at once. Don’t get me wrong, it was hilarious chaos and fun while it lasted, especially compared to the following year when he inexplicably decided he didn’t actually like attacking that much after all. But there’s no way it was good for the club long term.

When you look at some of his signings they just appear a bit all over the place. Replacing Rafael with Darmian because he hates Brazilians, signing two goalkeepers only to fall out with one of them publicly and never play him, signing Rojo purely because he’s left footed...it was all just weird. Add to this the fact that he broke up the title winning team way too quickly, I mean I’ve covered Rafael, he also sold Evans, Kagawa, Nani, Hernandez, Welbeck, Fletcher and let Ferdinand, Vidic and Evra leave in the same summer. It was just mental that he didn’t even try to keep some cohesion.

Contrast this with Ole who won’t swap out more than 20% per summer, actually values the character of players he’s bringing in and wants to foster a squad that grows together and has chemistry, unlike just plonking 11 individuals on a pitch together and hoping for the best.

I’d say what Ole is doing is far healthier for the club long term than what LVG did, the effects of which Ole is still trying to fix right now.
 

Sylar

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
40,491
I wouldn’t class what Van Gaal did as the same as what Ole is doing. To me he just seemed like a mad bastard with a scatter gun approach to transfers. There was no cohesion or planning to it. He’d sign players we didn’t really need like Falcao and end up playing with a top heavy team just to fit him in. We used to have Di Maria, Rooney, Falcao and Van Persie all on the pitch at once. Don’t get me wrong, it was hilarious chaos and fun while it lasted, especially compared to the following year when he inexplicably decided he didn’t actually like attacking that much after all. But there’s no way it was good for the club long term.
I agree with this. And this resulted in times with Fellaini up top, or DiMaria up top despite his best performances coming in midfield, then planning pre-season with a 352 and then changing it after one result. Or finally stumbling into a 433 which helped us secure CL to then start the next season going for a 4231 (which worked when he was rotating carrick and basty, then for some mad reason decided to play them both vs arsenal to press high).
 
Joined
May 22, 2017
Messages
13,122
I wouldn’t class what Van Gaal did as the same as what Ole is doing. To me he just seemed like a mad bastard with a scatter gun approach to transfers. There was no cohesion or planning to it. He’d sign players we didn’t really need like Falcao and end up playing with a top heavy team just to fit him in. We used to have Di Maria, Rooney, Falcao and Van Persie all on the pitch at once. Don’t get me wrong, it was hilarious chaos and fun while it lasted, especially compared to the following year when he inexplicably decided he didn’t actually like attacking that much after all. But there’s no way it was good for the club long term.

When you look at some of his signings they just appear a bit all over the place. Replacing Rafael with Darmian because he hates Brazilians, signing two goalkeepers only to fall out with one of them publicly and never play him, signing Rojo purely because he’s left footed...it was all just weird. Add to this the fact that he broke up the title winning team way too quickly, I mean I’ve covered Rafael, he also sold Evans, Kagawa, Nani, Hernandez, Welbeck, Fletcher and let Ferdinand, Vidic and Evra leave in the same summer. It was just mental that he didn’t even try to keep some cohesion.

Contrast this with Ole who won’t swap out more than 20% per summer, actually values the character of players he’s bringing in and wants to foster a squad that grows together and has chemistry, unlike just plonking 11 individuals on a pitch together and hoping for the best.

I’d say what Ole is doing is far healthier for the club long term than what LVG did, the effects of which Ole is still trying to fix right now.
LVG was a bit like Sven when he managed England - didn’t seem to know the players at all.

I’m not sure he had ever watched United before he joined.

like you say, scattergun was the approach. If ever a DoF was needed at was at this point.

it’s not that some of the players he got rid of weren’t good enough, it’s that he did it so quickly, and bought players who not only weren’t as good, were never going to be better.

for example with Rafael, if he sold him for a youngster with potential, but that player never fulfilled it - fine, it’s a pint that didn’t come off. But we bought a painfully average Darmian, who was never going to be anything but average. Absurd thinking.
 

wolvored

Full Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2016
Messages
9,947
Isn't Andreas on loan to Lazio with obligation to buy?
No. There is no obligation to buy. Dont think he has been picked that many times either. Another waste of space given a new 4+1 year contract in 2019. Watch them also add on the other year.
 

wolvored

Full Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2016
Messages
9,947
I honestly don't know what does "start all over" mean. Do people think that if say one manager leaves and the next arrives, he has to throw everything the previous one did out of the window before starting his job? I'm not saying Ole should leave (obviously not, he's done well at the moment and our comeback since the CL exit has been great) but I'm just talking in perspective. Things don't work like this in any club at all. The current squad should be built in a way that would work under any manager, the current or any upcoming one. That's the basis big clubs work on.

IMO we are pretty much finished article apart from one or two players. Most of the squad are either in their prime or pretty close to approach it. If you ask me what's the perfect time for these players to win something, I would say now and within the next 2 years max. They are showing it already, considering that we have reached a lot of semi finals and are currently on a possible title run. They are just missing one thing and that's taking one step forward to win it all.

I feel like some are afraid to say that we are finally good enough for a title challenge and are trying to control expectations so that they aren't disappointed if something went south. We absolutely are and are already showing it. The current squad is good enough to challenge for the big prizes.
I dont think we are close to the finished article. We are a one player team and if anything happened to Bruno we would be a 5-8th place team again. You only need to look at the West Ham game first half. Hes now tiring and not putting in the performances and this has shown over the last 3 games.
We had a flukey win over Wanderers, a dubious penalty against the Villa and were put to bed by City.
We are better than this time last season as Ole said, but we still need a young striker as Martial is nowhere near good enough, still need a RW and were hoping Diallo or Pelestri will come good for that. Need a proper DM as neither Fred or McTom can play the role. RB and CB also need improving. We have a very good technical midfielder who will turn to shit as Ole doesnt play him.
 

Jeppers7

Pogfamily Mafia
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
7,433
I dont think we are close to the finished article. We are a one player team and if anything happened to Bruno we would be a 5-8th place team again. You only need to look at the West Ham game first half. Hes now tiring and not putting in the performances and this has shown over the last 3 games.
We had a flukey win over Wanderers, a dubious penalty against the Villa and were put to bed by City.
We are better than this time last season as Ole said, but we still need a young striker as Martial is nowhere near good enough, still need a RW and were hoping Diallo or Pelestri will come good for that. Need a proper DM as neither Fred or McTom can play the role. RB and CB also need improving. We have a very good technical midfielder who will turn to shit as Ole doesnt play him.
We’re far from a one player team. Bruno’s stats are great but the reality is a lot of his assists are square passes that aren’t even great chances, or a really good pass against Villa that Rashford chased after....but you wouldn’t expect it to lead to a goal. On top of that we get a lot of penalties so he has scored a lot of goals....but he isn’t putting players through one on one constantly or scoring winning goals from open play week on week. Rashford has had a big impact this season....McT had a massive impact in the Leeds game, Pogba had a big impact in the Villa game, Cavani in the Southampton game etc. Bruno is getting the headlines but in truth it’s a miriad of players who are helping us win games. Bruno would be the biggest loss though, but not the be all and end all as the last few games have shown. His overall performances this season haven’t been great over 90 mins.
 

Godfather

Full Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
29,940
Location
Austria
Lingard, Jones and Pereira still need to leave. Those three I want out the most
 

wolvored

Full Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2016
Messages
9,947
We’re far from a one player team. Bruno’s stats are great but the reality is a lot of his assists are square passes that aren’t even great chances, or a really good pass against Villa that Rashford chased after....but you wouldn’t expect it to lead to a goal. On top of that we get a lot of penalties so he has scored a lot of goals....but he isn’t putting players through one on one constantly or scoring winning goals from open play week on week. Rashford has had a big impact this season....McT had a massive impact in the Leeds game, Pogba had a big impact in the Villa game, Cavani in the Southampton game etc. Bruno is getting the headlines but in truth it’s a miriad of players who are helping us win games. Bruno would be the biggest loss though, but not the be all and end all as the last few games have shown. His overall performances this season haven’t been great over 90 mins.
We started to play a lot better after he arrived. You say a lot of his assists are square passes , but they aint. He has had a good mixture if you look overall. His goals without the pens are more than all the other midfielders put together. Watch the West Ham game and see the difference between first half and after he came on. It was if a light switch had been turned on. We can miss any other player and there wouldnt be much difference. We cant miss him.
 

Pughnichi

Full Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2016
Messages
1,611
I’d argue phase one was Smalling, Lukaku, Sanchez, Young, Darmian, Valencia and Fellaini.
Absolutely. And phase one was perfect. There is only an argument for Smalling to have stayed. The rest were/are average at best.

Phase 2 is taking shape nicely with Rojo, TFM and Romero looking likely to leave with only Romero worthy of staying.

Let’s hope he can continue in the summer with Jones leaving, Pereira getting a permanent move (likely) and Lingard leaving for decent money

No issue with Mata staying. He’s a good role model for the squad.

OGS is doing a brilliant job re squad management.
 

Mainoldo

New Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2004
Messages
22,965
I wouldn’t class what Van Gaal did as the same as what Ole is doing. To me he just seemed like a mad bastard with a scatter gun approach to transfers. There was no cohesion or planning to it. He’d sign players we didn’t really need like Falcao and end up playing with a top heavy team just to fit him in. We used to have Di Maria, Rooney, Falcao and Van Persie all on the pitch at once. Don’t get me wrong, it was hilarious chaos and fun while it lasted, especially compared to the following year when he inexplicably decided he didn’t actually like attacking that much after all. But there’s no way it was good for the club long term.

When you look at some of his signings they just appear a bit all over the place. Replacing Rafael with Darmian because he hates Brazilians, signing two goalkeepers only to fall out with one of them publicly and never play him, signing Rojo purely because he’s left footed...it was all just weird. Add to this the fact that he broke up the title winning team way too quickly, I mean I’ve covered Rafael, he also sold Evans, Kagawa, Nani, Hernandez, Welbeck, Fletcher and let Ferdinand, Vidic and Evra leave in the same summer. It was just mental that he didn’t even try to keep some cohesion.

Contrast this with Ole who won’t swap out more than 20% per summer, actually values the character of players he’s bringing in and wants to foster a squad that grows together and has chemistry, unlike just plonking 11 individuals on a pitch together and hoping for the best.

I’d say what Ole is doing is far healthier for the club long term than what LVG did, the effects of which Ole is still trying to fix right now.
He had a plan and was ruthless in what he wanted. I don’t see what was so mad about it. He wasn’t transparent either he explained every position... like having too many number 10’s.

I don’t get what you mean at all.. the team was ready to be dismantled which is why he came into a hard job. RVP left for Turkey not Barcelona. Falcao was a club gamble we can all admit to that. Kagawa too many number 10’s (Just meant he doesn’t get 5 mins of the bench like VDB). Evans we had too many CB’s and he prefers left and right footed which known everybody seems we think to need to be able to play out from the back under Ole. Welbeck again too many strikers and we got £18m. Nani went to Lisbon on loan yet again not Barca. Basically everything was reasonable and with reason. Not everything works out perfect but we all knew what he was trying to do it was just boring.
 

stubie

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2009
Messages
9,684
Location
UK
It really does beggar belief how Jones is still on our books, he was given a new contract about 18 months ago, why? Jones has never fulfilled the promise Fergie saw in him; I believe Fergie once claimed Jones could be our best player since Duncan Edwards! Usually Fergie was spot on with his player assessments, but he must have come out with that the morning after, probably the morning after Hogmannay!
Don’t forget Fergie once claimed Dong Fangzhoo the next Batistuta!
 

charlenefan

Far less insightful than the other Charley
Joined
Aug 17, 2005
Messages
33,052
Except we did extend Lingard's contract and did offer TFM a new one
 

Matt851

Full Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2016
Messages
2,126
That is a really really interesting idea. Some people question his tactics on the pitch but he seems to be helping to steer the club in a much healthier direction.
I hear this a lot and really dont get. What skills has he shown that would make him suited to a DOF role?

Personally i am not that impressed by this great clear out becaise all the players are obviously not good enough. Realistically we should have done more to get rid of them in the last two summers

In terms of transfer business bruno has been outstanding but the rest havs been meh
 

Dante

Average bang
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
25,280
Location
My wit's end
I wouldn’t class what Van Gaal did as the same as what Ole is doing. To me he just seemed like a mad bastard with a scatter gun approach to transfers. There was no cohesion or planning to it. He’d sign players we didn’t really need like Falcao and end up playing with a top heavy team just to fit him in. We used to have Di Maria, Rooney, Falcao and Van Persie all on the pitch at once. Don’t get me wrong, it was hilarious chaos and fun while it lasted, especially compared to the following year when he inexplicably decided he didn’t actually like attacking that much after all. But there’s no way it was good for the club long term.

When you look at some of his signings they just appear a bit all over the place. Replacing Rafael with Darmian because he hates Brazilians, signing two goalkeepers only to fall out with one of them publicly and never play him, signing Rojo purely because he’s left footed...it was all just weird. Add to this the fact that he broke up the title winning team way too quickly, I mean I’ve covered Rafael, he also sold Evans, Kagawa, Nani, Hernandez, Welbeck, Fletcher and let Ferdinand, Vidic and Evra leave in the same summer. It was just mental that he didn’t even try to keep some cohesion.

Contrast this with Ole who won’t swap out more than 20% per summer, actually values the character of players he’s bringing in and wants to foster a squad that grows together and has chemistry, unlike just plonking 11 individuals on a pitch together and hoping for the best.

I’d say what Ole is doing is far healthier for the club long term than what LVG did, the effects of which Ole is still trying to fix right now.
Brilliant post.
 

Siorac

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
23,815
It really does beggar belief how Jones is still on our books, he was given a new contract about 18 months ago, why? Jones has never fulfilled the promise Fergie saw in him; I believe Fergie once claimed Jones could be our best player since Duncan Edwards! Usually Fergie was spot on with his player assessments, but he must have come out with that the morning after, probably the morning after Hogmannay!
He said it in the post-match interview after we clinched number 20 with the 3-0 win against Villa. It was odd even then, though Jones did play in that game and he was only 21 at the time.
 

Jeppers7

Pogfamily Mafia
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
7,433
We started to play a lot better after he arrived. You say a lot of his assists are square passes , but they aint. He has had a good mixture if you look overall. His goals without the pens are more than all the other midfielders put together. Watch the West Ham game and see the difference between first half and after he came on. It was if a light switch had been turned on. We can miss any other player and there wouldnt be much difference. We cant miss him.
He’s made a difference for sure, I mean he replaced Lingard or Perriera generally in the 10 position. He’s a class act but we’re no one man team. As for West Ham it’s one game and I think if we’d have brought Bruno or Rashford on on their own it wouldn’t have had the same affect. There’s many instances of other players coming on and impacting games anyway....Cavani, Greenwood, Pogba, Mata have all had impacts. I don’t think we’re as reliant on him as you think. His performances over 90 minutes aren’t always great.
 

dave1956

Full Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2016
Messages
464
I believe that we may find difficulty selling Jones because of the frequency of his injuries and the time period he has been side lined, if I am correct he has not played a competitive game in a year. I see possibly 3 scenarios for him. 1. Having been given an extended contract ( Financial details of which we have no idea but I assume that he could not get the same at another club ) he may choose to see out his contract. 2. He retires because of his injuries. 3 The club buy out his remaining contract just to get him off the wage bill.