First part is correct. If Chelsea/City would have hired Moyes I would have laughed with them and rule them out of the title race.So you'd made your mind up before he was appointed, anything he does won't be good enough for you regardless.
The second part isn't. I would love to prove me wrong. But if he does anything even worse than expected (on already low expectations) than of course he won't be good enough for me.
I am not an oracle but you don't need to be to predict when we'll finish. All of our teams are playing significantly better than us. The question is if we'll finish below or above Spurs and Everton. Arsenal, Chelsea, City and Liverpool will finish all above us, and we'll lose more points than them.Also, you have no idea where we'll finish this season, don't act like you actually do.
Only two weeks ago the mood here was that we're back on the title race. Since then we have won only 2 points when the minimum we should have won was 7.
Neither me. I don't also subscribe to the idea of keeping an average manager for long despite he is doing a mare job because he suddenly turn out to be good. Will Liverpool be good if they gave time to Hodgson? Juve to Ferrara? Madrid to Ramos?I don't subscribe to the "next manager please" merry go round going on at Chelsea, which is what you appear to be suggesting with your "one season and just one season" approach, it's incredibly short-sighted. All managers need time, not even half a season isn't enough time to judge a person, one season will only give you half an idea. Moyes hasn't had the best start to his United career and there are a lot of reasons for that, some of the blame even lies with himself, undoubtedly. He's got to have time to learn and settle into the role though and if you're convinced that you've already given it him you're undoubtedly one of the stupidest people I've ever spoke to regarding football, and my best mate's a scouser.
All managers need time? I can see good managers doing well in this short time they had (similar to Moyes). Pep is doing excellent with Bayern. Mourinho is doing alright with Chelsea, as is Pellegrini with City, or Ancelotti with Madrid, or Blank with PSG.
Heck, Martinez is doing excellently with a team that is going into a similar transition like us. Like in United, all Everton players have played for Everton under a single manager who was as much powerful on Everton as SAF to us. Yet they are playing better than they have ever played under Moyes.
'We've not had the best start' is incredibly biased. I watch us regularly since 2001-2002 and we have had the worst start on both poins and performances on all these years. This is much worse than 'we've not had the best start'.If you asked me for my opinion right now I would say "We've not had the best start, Moyes has a lot to improve on, as do the players. I wouldn't be able to judge the season until it's actually over though". I'm not praising the team at the moment but I'm not being a twat about the side I love either.
Ferguson told you to support the new manager, that doesn't mean a couple of games, that means give him fecking time.
Ferguson forget the word 'right' before the word 'manager'. Anyway, I don't care for this point at all. It's not that Ferguson never did any mistake, he did plentey. He said that Bebe is a 20 goal per season striker, he signed Young in order to catch up with Barca, he said that Cleverley and Welbeck are on the level of Thiago, he said that Allardyce is a top proven manager (all from his last book). What makes you think that this particular decision may not be wrong?