Andy_Cole
Full Member
We’ve just won surely we’re not in a relegation battle.
Who?There's been a month and a bit since that image in the OP and there's only one team that's still on the exact same points...
Everton, that poster supports them.Who?
Yeah was thinking the same. Even the above would be mean 31 is enough for Newcastle to stay up if I'm understanding that correctly.Could we see a new record low points tally to earn survival in the Premier League era?
Apparently West Brom hold that record, staying up with 34 in 04/05.
At current rate the teams are on for:
Norwich 28
---------------------------------
Newcastle 27
Watford 27
Burnley 25
I know the fight for survival often sees form pick up but that's some desperate stuff so far. Then there's Everton with 1 win in their last 14 attempts trying to crash the party.
Edit: How Sporting Index (spread betting firm) see it. It's their business to try and be right and they'll actually be looking at the fixture list plus many other factors which I wasn't just above.
Yes, 31 could be enough by their reckoning.Yeah was thinking the same. Even the above would be mean 31 is enough for Newcastle to stay up if I'm understanding that correctly.
Got it. I think they may have factored in Newcastle buying a few players between now and end of January to be able to get 19 points from 17 remaining games though even that does not sound that high.Yes, 31 could be enough by their reckoning.
How that works is that those are "buy" and "sell" prices. So you can buy Burnley at 32 and sell at 30.5. Buying Burnley at 32 means you think they'll get more than 32. Selling them at 30.5 means you think that they'll get less than 30.5.
You'd pick a stake, say £50 per point and then wait to end of the season to see what happens. If you bought them and they get 35 then that's 3 points more than the buy price so you'd win 3x£50. If they got less than the 32 after buying them, let's say 29 you'd have been wrong by 3 points and owe them 3x£50.
If they were to set the spread at an obviously bad place for any team then people would pounce on it and it would potentially cost them a lot of money so they need be fairly accurate and they're obviously pretty good at what they do. That means that the range of 30.5-32 points is essentially what is predicted for Burnley to finish on. If the prediction was right and Burnley got 31 then 31 with a better GD would indeed be enough for Newcastle.
Edit to add: That's how UK spread betting works and those prices came from the UK. The US version is a bit different.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I was going to say you'd still beat Norwich....but errr you've already played them twice and lost away two months ago. And Watford stuck 5 past you at Goodison.Worst team in the league.
can see at least 3 points they'll get
Lowest points tally for 17th or to mathematically stay up? If the latter, 31 would have been enough in 09/10 due to Hull and Burnley finishing on 30 points in 18th and 19th.Could we see a new record low points tally to earn survival in the Premier League era?
Apparently West Brom hold that record, staying up with 34 in 04/05.
At current rate the teams are on for:
Norwich 28
---------------------------------
Newcastle 27
Watford 27
Burnley 25
I know the fight for survival often sees form pick up but that's some desperate stuff so far. Then there's Everton with 1 win in their last 14 attempts trying to crash the party.
Edit: How Sporting Index (spread betting firm) see it. It's their business to try and be right and they'll actually be looking at the fixture list plus many other factors which I wasn't just above.
3 points since the middle of December? Jesus wept.Points gained by those 10 clubs in the OP since this thread was made:
Crystal Palace - 13 points in 11 games (1.18 ppg)
Brentford - 10 points in 13 games (0.77 ppg)
Brighton and Hove Albion - 13 points in 12 games (1.08 ppg)
Everton - 3 points in 9 games (0.33 ppg)
Southampton - 18 points in 12 games (1.5 ppg)
Leeds United - 10 points in 12 games (0.83 ppg)
Watford - 9 points in 13 games (0.69 ppg)
Burnley - 10 points in 12 games (0.83 ppg)
Newcastle United - 21 points in 11 games (1.91 ppg)
Norwich City - 7 points in 12 games (0.58 ppg)
For the 17th place finisher is what I meant at the time.Lowest points tally for 17th or to mathematically stay up? If the latter, 31 would have been enough in 09/10 due to Hull and Burnley finishing on 30 points in 18th and 19th.