utdalltheway
Sexy Beast
But he looked onside.If the ref was unsure, the attacker got the benefit of the doubt. If they're offside there is no doubt.
But he looked onside.If the ref was unsure, the attacker got the benefit of the doubt. If they're offside there is no doubt.
absurd.
Im not being funny but its been explained a million tines on here that it isnt just bent, arbitrary lines.Sure.
he was onside when it was passed. LudicrousBut he looked onside.
No it wasn't. In moment off pass he was in offside. Ffs people. 1mm, 1cm,1m....doesn't matter. It is bloody offsideit was given as he was coming back from an offside position BEFORE the ball was played?
London stadium, my keyboard is crap it seems.At Carrow Road? They're fine on my telly.
So am I it is ridiculous, as it wasn’t given at the time there should be daylight between the players for it to get overturnedI am waiting to witness an armpit goal.
That’s the same angle shown. The spurs defender’s knee looks level with pukkis armpit.
PL for me summed up in 2019
To you maybe, to the professionals with all the tech at hand, not so much.But he looked onside.
So, level then. Madness
This, what we can say at least if they should introduce a margin of tolerance or not for not but then again why use technology then ?No it wasn't. In moment off pass he was in offside. Ffs people. 1mm, 1cm,1m....doesn't matter. It is bloody offside
That's what it is at the moment.This should not be offside. But it's not the closeness of the call I take issue with. Problem is that Pukki correctly adjusted his run to be in line with the defender. To make sure he (and with him every hair of his body) is definitely onside under the current rules he has to stay behind the defender which is nonsense to me. Should be changed to the position of the feet or at least only parts of the body you can score with.
That Brighton one before looked like they ruled his arm offAn arm can't be offside. A shoulder can.
fth is that?
bloody VAR
And then have it disallowed for handball...I am waiting to witness an armpit goal.
Eh. It's 1-1 isn't it?fecking West Ham. Shite.
He is cheering Leicester on. Not sure why.Eh. It's 1-1 isn't it?
Where? I love my phone way too much to do thatSomeone threw a phone
mental
This. Ref should take a quick look at the monitor to decide on the borderline calls instead of drawing fancy perpendicular lines from armpits and shit.Offside law needs to be changed, can't be ruling out goals because of millimetres
So the problem is the angles we’re shown?To you maybe, to the professionals with all the tech at hand, not so much.
How is that offside? How can you disallow a goal because of this?? I’m really baffled by this implementation of VAR.
It will always be millimetres regardless of where you put the line. Push line forward and it pulls in the clear offsides we have now into the too close category.It willQUOTE="charlenefan, post: 25092168, member: 17321"]
Offside law needs to be changed, can't be ruling out goals because of millimetres
I know I was going off what Sky were telling us, but they didn’t say they equalised before HT.Eh. It's 1-1 isn't it?
You should trust our new VAR overlords.So the problem is the angles we’re shown?
Maybe they shouldn’t show them then.
Why isn't the blue line up to the defenders shoulder, which appears to be ahead of his knee?
If the blue line was as tall as the red line then it would show as going through the spurs player just like the red line does with Pukki???
I’m not that’s B20, I have no idea why he’s cheering for them either.He is cheering Leicester on. Not sure why.