Jacob
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2005
- Messages
- 25,577
Fecking Raiola, he's making a living to say the least.
This straight deal is definitely better than selling Miki to another club and use the money to sign Sanchez. As far what I can remember Arsenal wanted 35m fees for Sanchez, not sure how did you get that 20m value.Do none of you understand that Mkhitaryan had a market value, would it have been easier to understand had we sold him to another club and then paid that fee to Arsenal? Also the signing on fee was £20m. Go listen to Duncan Castle’s podcast and he backs up Matt Law’s original claim that Sanchez’s agent asked for the money city were saving this jan compared the last summer to be paid to himself and his client in the form of a greater signing on fee and wages.
Arsenal exchanged him for a player they values at £35m, there is one.Who is going to buy 28 years old player who can't even get into our match day squad for 40m ? Name me a team
You're just making things up here to suit your agenda.Not quite as putting him in the shop window would highlight a serious issue to other clubs hence his price plummeting. Probably around 40m. Anyway there is no point talking about how much he would cost now to others as it's a moot point since by time he leaves you he'll be past it.
In hindsight this whole thread is silly. OP looks like he tried to use some other transfers to make himself feel better about this one, but truth is you are paying a pretty penny here. Regardless if you can afford it then fair enough.You're just making things up here to suit your agenda.
It's very silly.