Red Dreams
Full Member
Is it legal to bribe?
Not with US currency, or using a US institution, or bank, or corporation.Is it legal to bribe?
thats called lobbying.Not with US currency.
thats called lobbying.
Im quite certain that virtually every nation who has hosted the world cup made a similar mockery of the process.Cal? post: 21574010 said:This, letting Qatar keep it just makes a mockery of the whole process.
The legal basis for revoking it would be evidence that it was done via corruption and bribery, thereby defaming the credibility of football. Corruption and bribery are generally illegal in most developed legal systems so it shouldn't be that difficult to build a case against them. Fifa could also just take the bid away from them and give it to another nation then deal with the legal issues as they arise.Perhaps you are morally correct, but I'd like how Qaters right to host the tournament can be legally revoked. As I said before it was stated that is would be legally impossible to revoke the bid, so I imagine the legal paperwork is watertight. Anyone ever seen it?
And so, practically speaking, which body or court is required to make such a decision and how long would such process take? Given the people and sensitivities involved, can one be certain this process would be immune from nefarious lobbying and influences? FIFA would also have to be punished, no matter that employee's involved no longer work there.
You will know better than me how massive can of worms it is, involving many very powerful people, whose interest far exceed the game of football, and so the politics involved are very complex and would trigger off another whole round of unintended consequences.
does not make it right does it?Im quite certain that virtually every nation who has hosted the world cup made a similar mockery of the process.
Not with US currency, or using a US institution, or bank, or corporation.
They could have the event around several axes:If there's supposed to be economic benefits to hosting it, surely it magnifies the benefits the more games any country gets?
I do realise that it's closer from NY to Toronto, but are they going to make it a East Coast WC?
My guess would be Mexico City hosts whatever group Mexico is in same with Toronto/Montreal and Canada then Split a group between say New York City and Washington DC or even Boston. Then split a group between Seattle and Vancouver. Then Los Angeles and Miami.If there's supposed to be economic benefits to hosting it, surely it magnifies the benefits the more games any country gets?
I do realise that it's closer from NY to Toronto, but are they going to make it a East Coast WC?
They are letting the legal isssues take its course.I don't understand, everyone knows the bid was corrupt, so why haven't any of the National FAs come out and said that they are boycotting this tournament?
It wouldn't matter where the tournament is being held if the best teams refuse to play in it. That alone would force FIFA to change the location as no one would want to watch a WC without the likes of Germany, England, Brazil, USA or Spain.
Or am I missing some law that requires national teams to play in the world cup or face sanctions if they refuse?
Did you watch England's last game?I don't understand, everyone knows the bid was corrupt, so why haven't any of the National FAs come out and said that they are boycotting this tournament?
It wouldn't matter where the tournament is being held if the best teams refuse to play in it. That alone would force FIFA to change the location as no one would want to watch a WC without the likes of Germany, England, Brazil, USA or Spain.
UEFA should be at the front of any boycott, seeing as a winter world cup would hit them hardest in terms of rescheduling the domestic and European fixture list for around two-three years.
Or am I missing some law that requires national teams to play in the world cup or face sanctions if they refuse?
$$$I don't understand, everyone knows the bid was corrupt, so why haven't any of the National FAs come out and said that they are boycotting this tournament?
It wouldn't matter where the tournament is being held if the best teams refuse to play in it. That alone would force FIFA to change the location as no one would want to watch a WC without the likes of Germany, England, Brazil, USA or Spain.
Or am I missing some law that requires national teams to play in the world cup or face sanctions if they refuse?
What I've been wondering too. Get all the big boys to boycott and Fifa would have no choice but to move it from Qatar.I don't understand, everyone knows the bid was corrupt, so why haven't any of the National FAs come out and said that they are boycotting this tournament?
It wouldn't matter where the tournament is being held if the best teams refuse to play in it. That alone would force FIFA to change the location as no one would want to watch a WC without the likes of Germany, England, Brazil, USA or Spain.
Would that mean three places for the hosts though... Seems a lotWhy not?
What is the benefit to hosting it on your own really?
As long as FIFA arrange a co-hosted tournament properly, each of the USA, Canada and Mexico could play their first 4 or 5 games (assuming they get that far) in their respective countries.
It's also easier to travel from New York to Toronto than it is from New York to LA.
Did you watch England's last game?
Man, what would we do with WC without England. Without USA...
Can't bear to imagine that.
lot more places in the tournament. 32.Would that mean three places for the hosts though... Seems a lot
Give it to a country that doesn't even believe in the game & had it last in 1994, yet ignore the home of football who last hosted it in 1966.Give it to the US, we had the best bid.
There are plenty of Americans that like football, its one of the biggest and diverse countries in the world. Just because it's not their most popular sport doesn't mean there isn't appetite for the game in America.Give it to a country that doesn't even believe in the game & had it last in 1994, yet ignore the home of football who last hosted it in 1966.
Yes we are. I live in Shanghai and July - September was rarely below 35C and up to 43C. There is also very little difference between night and daytime temperatures compared to some countries (usually only ca. 5C and humidity is at it's highest).Summer in China is absolutely fine for football games especially for late kick off game. It's no different like when the WC was in South or North America. Summer in these countries are very hot but we are not talking about 40-50 C like in Qatar.
Cal is right. You are wrong I'm afraid. Where temperatures are concerned. Many games are played in the evening.Not sure where you get the 35+ (maybe the peak) , the average high temperature for most big cities in China is around 30. China is also trying to bid for WC 2026 and weather is not a big concern.
BTW, in many countries in Asia 35+ weather is normal and many sports are played in this condition.
How late are you thinking ?! Because there is a +7 hours differenceBejing around 27 in July.. . Plus games likely to kick off very late to accommodate European viewing times
I'm not sure about the attacks (at least not as reprisal). Qatar are not well liked amongst Arab nations who might enjoy seeing their loss of face.I was saying they'd retaliate if it's pulled away from them. Both financially and with attacks, it fits the narrative.
Other poster was talking about domestic terrorism in Qatar.
I was thinking attacks against the host nation that replaces them.
Of course it is. The world's politics are built upon it. Whether overt or covert.Is it legal to bribe?
Bribery is illegal in most countries, unless of course you don't like an a democratic state in which case its more common and legally "overlooked".Of course it is. The world's politics are built upon it. Whether overt or covert.
It would indeed, especially since England got screwed by this whole Russia/Qatar thing.Lots of "England/USA/etc can easily host it at short notice"
I'm not so sure. Stadia might ready but there's a considerable financial implication too, which the governments in question may or may not be willing to allow.
A WC in England should be cracking though.
You could say the same about quite a few countries. England, Germany, France, Spain, USA, Japan...England will have a very good shout if they do take it from Qatar.
England could have everything ready in a matter of months, if not weeks.
Every match sold out.
Would be a superb tournament.
I'm not sure FIFA could even give it to a combined bid from 3 CONCACAF countries all of whom would require byes into the finals .. and what about the other CONCACAF countries ? They would need to be given a chance to qualify too. So FOUR CONCACAF countries ? Unless they expand the number of countries (as has been mooted) then this would surely be a non-starter.They could have the event around several axes:
NE: New York, Boston, Montreal, Toronto
West Coast: LA, the bay, Seattle, Vancouver
South: Houston, Dallas, Mexico City
Midwest: Indianapolis, Chicago, Detroit, Columbus
If you don't believe that MNCs run virtually all of the Western world then, IMHO, that's naive. Money runs power and MNCs have it and utilise it, politicians are merely puppets, whether they like and agree to it or not.Bribery is illegal in most countries, unless of course you don't like an a democratic state in which case its more common and legally "overlooked".