Don't tell me this thread will still be going then
Qatar or Ineos - which owners would you prefer? | Vote now Private
- Thread starter Zlatattack
- Start date
Don't tell me this thread will still be going then
They want to celebrate one more league title with us before they go
I just hope things do not jeopardise our plans going into next season, that's all.
I don’t think it will and it really shouldn’t in my opinion. Transfers would be deemed a Business As Usual activity for a football club and the two bidders surely know they’ve got to cover it (and both easily have the money to cover it).
Apple won’t stop manufacturing electronics or designing new technology if they’re in the midst of an M&A event for example.
Will jeopardise until January IF it happens
Apple aren’t run by the Glazers…
I wish it was that simple but I just get the feeling we're going to get fecked.
It could be too late by then though. I don't want to be dropping silly points next season. To have the best chance of success, we need to be having our full squad for pre-season. Anything other than that has to be seen as a handicap, especially considering what other clubs will be doing.
I would be okay with not getting any material benefit until January if the club sale was confirmed before the start of the season. That's the best we can hope for now.
What do you mean by material benefit?
I get that impression. I might be wrong but as I understand it, sir Jim is after a majority shareholding and having to borrow to get that. Thus the Glazers will still be on the board and we will still have some kind of debt
it's all so sordid isn't it?
it wouldn't surprise me if the qataris call the kinehans in as 'negotiators of last resort'.
it wouldn't surprise me if the qataris call the kinehans in as 'negotiators of last resort'.
