QF2: Wales vs Belgium

SteveJ

all-round nice guy, aka Uncle Joe Kardashian
Scout
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
62,851
verminater said:
It's the Mail Steve!
You're right, chief - I should've considered that. :D
Meanwhile, the Mail has a piece on the expensive watches "England's flops" wear. I wish I was kidding...
 

LLMU

Full Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2004
Messages
3,971
Location
currently unknown
Congratulation to the Welsh team. Good tactics and knowing the team strength brought them this far in the tournament.
 

Zlatan 7

We've got bush!
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
11,799
Absolute top draw today....goosebumps at the final whistle. I'm ecstatic for the Welsh...what spirit and determination they all showed. Our English lads could learn a thing or two from them...or 8 ! Turns out Gareth Bale was right about their passion after all when he was comparing the two nations.

Gwaaaaan !
Awsome stuff mate :)
I woke up still with the goosebumps, can't believe what happened last night, the whole country will be buzzing today.

When Williams scored I had no where to go other than to belt it up the stairs in celebration, turned around to go back down to see my 6 yr old also charging up Them behind me shouting yeeeees, everyone else going wild in the living room, was so funny and the memory will last a long time.. The other two goals I was so in disbelief I hardly celebrated, shock hit me and I just sat and smiled.
Wales.... Who could have thought!
 
  • Like
Reactions: SteveJ

El-Manos

Full Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2011
Messages
14,960
Location
Ireland
Fair play to Wales, got their tactics right and know their strength. Now sack Wilmots and bring somebody in who will actually get this team going and knows that the feck he's doing. What. A Pathetic. Performance....I saw some shambolic defending at display today. Kompany was dearly missed for this one. Both lukaku's today were feckin terrible. Wouldn't score in a brothel, well done Romelu you imbecile. At least I'm convinced now United shouldn't go anywhere near you. Good luck to Wales for the rest of the tournament. At least this should be the final nail in the coffin for good old Mark. Adios amigo!
 
Last edited:

red4ever 79

New Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
9,530
Location
Czech Republic
The greatest night in Welsh football history. I didnt post on here last night as was too emotional. My dear old mum was watching on from above.

Our desire, determination and work ethic was outstanding. We have a system, and a game plan and the team works damn hard to carry that out.

Whatever happens next we have been the story of the tournament.
 

K2K

Full Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2015
Messages
18,367
Location
"Can Manchester United score? They always score"
The greatest night in Welsh football history. I didnt post on here last night as was too emotional. My dear old mum was watching on from above.

Our desire, determination and work ethic was outstanding. We have a system, and a game plan and the team works damn hard to carry that out.

Whatever happens next we have been the story of the tournament.
Iceland?

Wales are a good side and this really isn't suprising imo.
 

dogwithabone

Full Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2014
Messages
2,260
Think it's a bit of a disservice to Wales to bang on about work ethic, they're much more than that. They seemed to accept that Belgium would start fast and sat quiet deep but then Wales went on to control possession at important stages and basically the game mapped out as Wales wanted it to.

From that very first game when Davies made the clearance from under the bar from Hamsik they have defended heroically and that sequence of clearances last night was defending at its finest.

I think they will get past Portugal but then come a cropper in the final but what a story it's been !
 

Zlatan 7

We've got bush!
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
11,799
Iceland?

Wales are a good side and this really isn't suprising imo.
Yea, I'd say both Iceland and Wales have stood out, maybe I'm biased because Welsh and it's already Iceland being the stand out, if they get passed France, which I think they could, I'd certainly agree with you Iceland were story of the tournament.
 

Zlatan 7

We've got bush!
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
11,799
Think it's a bit of a disservice to Wales to bang on about work ethic, they're much more than that. They seemed to accept that Belgium would start fast and sat quiet deep but then Wales went on to control possession at important stages and basically the game mapped out as Wales wanted it to.

From that very first game when Davies made the clearance from under the bar from Hamsik they have defended heroically and that sequence of clearances last night was defending at its finest.

I think they will get past Portugal but then come a cropper in the final but what a story it's been !
I couldn't have put your post better, there's clearly a great work ethic there and they run their legs off, every single man but yes, there's more to it than that :) I think it's more of a disservice to them to always say how bad their opponent has been.

That goal line clearance from Davies in the first match defined the tournament for us, could have been so very different if that had gone in and we had to chase a goal.
The clearances last night in that funny five minutes were just unbelievable, I'm genuinely still in shock at what happened. I celebrated every Welsh corner, every Welsh free kick, every bloody throwing, confused the shit out of my 6 yr old as to why I liked throw ins so much, he's never had the chance to see me like that with United the past few years.
 

red4ever 79

New Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
9,530
Location
Czech Republic
I didnt say work ethis was the only contributing factor. They have a system, and every player knows their role and how to carry that out. Also there have been some outstanding performers also in WIlliams, Alan, Ramsey and Bale.

Yes I agree Iceland have also been a major story in the championships, however Iceland did have an easier match in the last 16 :)
 

Zlatan 7

We've got bush!
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
11,799
I didnt say work ethis was the only contributing factor. They have a system, and every player knows their role and how to carry that out. Also there have been some outstanding performers also in WIlliams, Alan, Ramsey and Bale.

Yes I agree Iceland have also been a major story in the championships, however Iceland did have an easier match in the last 16 :)
Ha, well played.
I'm not sure if he meant you personally saying work ethic was the only contributing factor, it's just that its so clear to see how hard they work it's easy to miss other positives.

To add to your list of outstanding performers I'd add Chester, Davies, kanu, it's hard to know where stop, each to a man have been magnificent. Robson kanu in the first half last night was outstanding and he's been immense for Wales for a while now leading the line.
 

dogwithabone

Full Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2014
Messages
2,260
I couldn't have put your post better, there's clearly a great work ethic there and they run their legs off, every single man but yes, there's more to it than that :) I think it's more of a disservice to them to always say how bad their opponent has been.

That goal line clearance from Davies in the first match defined the tournament for us, could have been so very different if that had gone in and we had to chase a goal.
The clearances last night in that funny five minutes were just unbelievable, I'm genuinely still in shock at what happened. I celebrated every Welsh corner, every Welsh free kick, every bloody throwing, confused the shit out of my 6 yr old as to why I liked throw ins so much, he's never had the chance to see me like that with United the past few years.
I was pleased for Wales too that Bale didn't score and I think secretly Coleman will have to been too now that the games won. Of course he's the talisman and a world class talent but sometimes his immense contribution can overshadow what the rest of the team do and had we seen his name on the scoresheet last night there's a tendency to think he's bailed (excuse the pun) them out again.
 

ZAGREB RED

Guest
Brilliant effort by Wales, don't see any reason they can't beat Portugal in the Semi final, they have been unbelievable in this tournament. Losing Davies and Ramsay might be decisive though, but with their team spirit they could cope.
 

Zlatan 7

We've got bush!
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
11,799
Still can't believe we're in the semis.
Or I can't! Still filling up with tears watching it on the news. Very strange emotions, mixtures of pride, relief, shock, happiness.
Waited many years for this! Amazing time for Wales football and hopefully encourage even more kids to take up football here in Wales, Forget the cruyff turn, I've gotta teach mine the Kanu turn today, already been demanded :cool:
 

Dr. Funkenstein

Not CAF Geert Wilders
Joined
May 20, 2014
Messages
1,713
Fair play to Wales, got their tactics right and know their strength. Now sack Wilmots and bring somebody in who will actually get this team going and knows that the feck he's doing. What. A Pathetic. Performance....I saw some shambolic defending at display today.
I've got to defend Wilmots here, of course he was out of his depth, but he got the job because they couldn't find anyone else. After years of mismanagement, empty stadiums and beeing the no 77 in the world the Belgian FA was a mess and did not have the money or organization to properly care for a national team. Van Gaal had talks with them and found out that's not how he wanted to work, Advocaat took the job, found about the circumstances he had to work in and quit. So Wilmots had to get them through qualifying and he did, they kept winning so he could stay. After the disappointing WC the quite poor but exciting match against the US the whole country including the king and the government was in denial and acted like they did well because the national football team was keeping the country together, the Flemish, the Wallons and the immigrants.

The players accepted the manager because they knew the situation and had to make the best of it, and they were good enough to get some results without a top manager. But a manager like that means that the players have to solve more issues on the pitch themselves, players like DeBruyne and Hazard shouldn't just have their runs and brilliant moves and shots, they should lead the team, they should be pointing a lot and get their teammates in the right positions. That's difficult for players, but that's the responsability that comes with accepting a manager like Wilmots. They weren't up to that.

In the end, Wilmots got the Belgian FA and the national team through a very difficult time were even the continuing existence of a Belgian national team was in doubt, and he took them to 1st in the world on the Fifa list. Now of course it's time for a seasoned manager, but that's a situation that is created with the help of Wilmots. So the Belgians should acknowledge that Wilmots wasn't good enough for the job, but be thankful for the job he did and respect the fact that he doesn't resign himself, but deserves his contract beeing ended with some nice financial compensation. Wilmots beeing the out of his depth manager was the problem created, wanted and chosen for by the Belgians.
 

Finn MacCool

New Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2016
Messages
1,535
Supports
Liverpool
They did go further since they were amongst the top 8 in 2012, while they were only amongst the top 16 this time.
They got out of the group stage on both occasions - more teams got out in 2016 and I would agree with you had they finished in third place and only got out because of that new rule.

They played the same number of games at both tournaments and failed at the first knockout round. We're splitting hairs really - they were rubbish in all tournaments under Roy.
 

Lurpak99

Buttered up
Joined
Jan 31, 2016
Messages
2,399
Location
Denmark
They got out of the group stage on both occasions - more teams got out in 2016 and I would agree with you had they finished in third place and only got out because of that new rule.

They played the same number of games at both tournaments and failed at the first knockout round. We're splitting hairs really - they were rubbish in all tournaments under Roy.
Well had only the top 2 gone through from every group, Slovakia wouldn't just have parked the bus in the last group game against England, since they would've needed to win, and then England might've gone out. It was easier to go through from the group this time, and England still only finished 2nd in an easier group than the one they won in 2012. It's minor details, but in 2012 England had a decent tournament, and certainly better than both 2014 and 2016.
 

Finn MacCool

New Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2016
Messages
1,535
Supports
Liverpool
Well had only the top 2 gone through from every group, Slovakia wouldn't just have parked the bus in the last group game against England, since they would've needed to win, and then England might've gone out. It was easier to go through from the group this time, and England still only finished 2nd in an easier group than the one they won in 2012. It's minor details, but in 2012 England had a decent tournament, and certainly better than both 2014 and 2016.
Had Slovakia not parked the bus England may also have won the group.
I agree that they did play a little better in 2012 but I don't think it was a decent tournament - they failed at the same point as they have done for most recent tournaments.

Your original point about Hodgson changing his style and trying to be more offensive is true but I'm not sure it would have made much of a difference - he is just an average manager who should never have got the job. Judging by the early front runners to replace him (Southgate, Alkardyce among them) England look set to repeat the mistake. The manager is not the only problem they have but it is one of the relatively easier ones to resolve.
 

JustFootballFan

Thinks Balotelli & Pogba look the same
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
4,245
Supports
Liverpool
I think it's superb what Wales are doing in this competition. Shame England players and management were nothing like their Welsh counterparts. Even though it was disappointing seeing some of the Welsh team cheer on England's defeat, I am happy for Welsh supporters.
But that´s what it´s all about. You should have a little Schadenfreude. Basically football and sports is there for countries to measure dick-size without throwing bombs. Imagine how peaceful the world would be, if the Middle East, Pakistan and some others were good at global sport. If Rami Sanjrani was like MVP of the NBA, everybody in Pakistan would be like: F*** You America, LeBron who? Steph Curry? We make best Curry. Bombs and prayers? I have no time for prayers, I need to watch Sanjrani win NBA finals.
 

devil in me

Full Member
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
6,603
Location
Hereford
Absolutely brilliant achievement. Delighted for Wales. But this isn't some plucky outfit that have done well to get to the semis. They're an excellent side who fully deserve to be there and I really fancy them to go on and beat Portugal.
 

kouroux

45k posts to finally achieve this tagline
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
96,163
Location
Djibouti (La terre des braves)
Fair play to Wales, got their tactics right and know their strength. Now sack Wilmots and bring somebody in who will actually get this team going and knows that the feck he's doing. What. A Pathetic. Performance....I saw some shambolic defending at display today. Kompany was dearly missed for this one. Both lukaku's today were feckin terrible. Wouldn't score in a brothel, well done Romelu you imbecile. At least I'm convinced now United shouldn't go anywhere near you. Good luck to Wales for the rest of the tournament. At least this should be the final nail in the coffin for good old Mark. Adios amigo!
International and club are too different. Not saying we should Lukaku but using this tournament as a justification to not buy him makes little sense.
 

Vashu

Predicted Sanchez's signing announcement
Joined
Jan 21, 2016
Messages
1,021
Seriously good game and great win for Wales. There was a bit of 'Space Jam' experience regarding Hal Robson-Kanu. Dumb ref robbed him of great chance early in the first half when he easily went past young Lukaku. Can't tell whose abilities he was channeling but he was such an enormous threat to Belgian defense and he's not even a striker, right?! Nor is he playing at 1st division football level. But overall that was if not faultless than almost perfect team performance by Wales. Congrats on making history.
 

Vashu

Predicted Sanchez's signing announcement
Joined
Jan 21, 2016
Messages
1,021
I've got to defend Wilmots here, of course he was out of his depth, but he got the job because they couldn't find anyone else. After years of mismanagement, empty stadiums and beeing the no 77 in the world the Belgian FA was a mess and did not have the money or organization to properly care for a national team. Van Gaal had talks with them and found out that's not how he wanted to work, Advocaat took the job, found about the circumstances he had to work in and quit. So Wilmots had to get them through qualifying and he did, they kept winning so he could stay. After the disappointing WC the quite poor but exciting match against the US the whole country including the king and the government was in denial and acted like they did well because the national football team was keeping the country together, the Flemish, the Wallons and the immigrants.

The players accepted the manager because they knew the situation and had to make the best of it, and they were good enough to get some results without a top manager. But a manager like that means that the players have to solve more issues on the pitch themselves, players like DeBruyne and Hazard shouldn't just have their runs and brilliant moves and shots, they should lead the team, they should be pointing a lot and get their teammates in the right positions. That's difficult for players, but that's the responsability that comes with accepting a manager like Wilmots. They weren't up to that.

In the end, Wilmots got the Belgian FA and the national team through a very difficult time were even the continuing existence of a Belgian national team was in doubt, and he took them to 1st in the world on the Fifa list. Now of course it's time for a seasoned manager, but that's a situation that is created with the help of Wilmots. So the Belgians should acknowledge that Wilmots wasn't good enough for the job, but be thankful for the job he did and respect the fact that he doesn't resign himself, but deserves his contract beeing ended with some nice financial compensation. Wilmots beeing the out of his depth manager was the problem created, wanted and chosen for by the Belgians.
Nice post full of insight. Sometimes context is everything.
 

VorZakone

What would Kenny G do?
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
33,010
It wasn't even a scrappy 1-0 win either. They beat Belgium with 3-1!
 

montpelier

Full Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2011
Messages
10,637
I thought Wales rode their luck a bit, tbh. Fellaini header, Lukaku tripped = big chance, probable red card. But they were always likely to have to do this. Two magnificent goals though, isn't it? Esp the header, pick that out!! Excellent build-up to that too.

Nit picking, you have to question how all 3 Belgian defenders all spectacularly bought the Cruyff turn cos they thought the ball was getting moved on leftwards, great run in support from the left wing back again? (Williams?) - who also might have scored himself, earlier on.
 

studs

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 21, 2013
Messages
650
Well done to Wales for that outstanding performance lastnight, out-fecking-standing. I had sweaty armpits and butterflys watching that game.
Now let them go out and do more of the same to Portugal and wipe Ronaldo's nose with his snotty bib.
 

Vashu

Predicted Sanchez's signing announcement
Joined
Jan 21, 2016
Messages
1,021
Nit picking, you have to question how all 3 Belgian defenders all spectacularly bought the Cruyff turn cos they thought the ball was getting moved on leftwards, great run in support from the left wing back again? (Williams?) - who also might have scored himself, earlier on.
Vidic, Ferdinand and Carrick wouldn't get themselves all fooled like that. I'd wager that if Vertonghen and Vermaelen had been available that action would also look a bit differently. But anyhow, when Robson-Kanu received the ball in the box it looked like the only way to go was passing it to his right for incoming teammate. That was seemingly a move that was, kind of, set in stone for all onlookers. And then he did the unthinkable. Simply ingenious move.
 

Ainu

Full Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2008
Messages
10,142
Location
Antwerp, Belgium
I've got to defend Wilmots here, of course he was out of his depth, but he got the job because they couldn't find anyone else. After years of mismanagement, empty stadiums and beeing the no 77 in the world the Belgian FA was a mess and did not have the money or organization to properly care for a national team. Van Gaal had talks with them and found out that's not how he wanted to work, Advocaat took the job, found about the circumstances he had to work in and quit. So Wilmots had to get them through qualifying and he did, they kept winning so he could stay. After the disappointing WC the quite poor but exciting match against the US the whole country including the king and the government was in denial and acted like they did well because the national football team was keeping the country together, the Flemish, the Wallons and the immigrants.

The players accepted the manager because they knew the situation and had to make the best of it, and they were good enough to get some results without a top manager. But a manager like that means that the players have to solve more issues on the pitch themselves, players like DeBruyne and Hazard shouldn't just have their runs and brilliant moves and shots, they should lead the team, they should be pointing a lot and get their teammates in the right positions. That's difficult for players, but that's the responsability that comes with accepting a manager like Wilmots. They weren't up to that.

In the end, Wilmots got the Belgian FA and the national team through a very difficult time were even the continuing existence of a Belgian national team was in doubt, and he took them to 1st in the world on the Fifa list. Now of course it's time for a seasoned manager, but that's a situation that is created with the help of Wilmots. So the Belgians should acknowledge that Wilmots wasn't good enough for the job, but be thankful for the job he did and respect the fact that he doesn't resign himself, but deserves his contract beeing ended with some nice financial compensation. Wilmots beeing the out of his depth manager was the problem created, wanted and chosen for by the Belgians.
What a load of rubbish. I never asked for someone like Wilmots and I thought it was absurd to keep him after the World Cup, when it became abundantly clear he would never improve this side. Sure it was our FA that decided to keep him around and I blame them for this mess as much as anyone. But Wilmots was and is a completely inept manager. I don't see why I should respect the awful job he did. Our NT beat teams and improved in the rankings thanks to individual talent and despite Wilmots. Whenever more than individual talent was required, we utterly failed. We haven't beaten a single half competent side in a competitive match under Wilmots. He's a pathetic excuse for a manager, absolutely worthless without any redeeming qualities. I'll celebrate his departure like we've won the World Cup.
 

thejtrain

Full Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2013
Messages
1,894
Location
Cary, NC
I've got to defend Wilmots here, of course he was out of his depth, but he got the job because they couldn't find anyone else. After years of mismanagement, empty stadiums and beeing the no 77 in the world the Belgian FA was a mess and did not have the money or organization to properly care for a national team. Van Gaal had talks with them and found out that's not how he wanted to work, Advocaat took the job, found about the circumstances he had to work in and quit. So Wilmots had to get them through qualifying and he did, they kept winning so he could stay. After the disappointing WC the quite poor but exciting match against the US the whole country including the king and the government was in denial and acted like they did well because the national football team was keeping the country together, the Flemish, the Wallons and the immigrants.

The players accepted the manager because they knew the situation and had to make the best of it, and they were good enough to get some results without a top manager. But a manager like that means that the players have to solve more issues on the pitch themselves, players like DeBruyne and Hazard shouldn't just have their runs and brilliant moves and shots, they should lead the team, they should be pointing a lot and get their teammates in the right positions. That's difficult for players, but that's the responsability that comes with accepting a manager like Wilmots. They weren't up to that.

In the end, Wilmots got the Belgian FA and the national team through a very difficult time were even the continuing existence of a Belgian national team was in doubt, and he took them to 1st in the world on the Fifa list. Now of course it's time for a seasoned manager, but that's a situation that is created with the help of Wilmots. So the Belgians should acknowledge that Wilmots wasn't good enough for the job, but be thankful for the job he did and respect the fact that he doesn't resign himself, but deserves his contract beeing ended with some nice financial compensation. Wilmots beeing the out of his depth manager was the problem created, wanted and chosen for by the Belgians.
Great insightful post for the most part.
 

Dr. Funkenstein

Not CAF Geert Wilders
Joined
May 20, 2014
Messages
1,713
What a load of rubbish. I never asked for someone like Wilmots and I thought it was absurd to keep him after the World Cup, when it became abundantly clear he would never improve this side. Sure it was our FA that decided to keep him around and I blame them for this mess as much as anyone. But Wilmots was and is a completely inept manager. I don't see why I should respect the awful job he did. Our NT beat teams and improved in the rankings thanks to individual talent and despite Wilmots. Whenever more than individual talent was required, we utterly failed. We haven't beaten a single half competent side in a competitive match under Wilmots. He's a pathetic excuse for a manager, absolutely worthless without any redeeming qualities. I'll celebrate his departure like we've won the World Cup.
Basically I agree. He should never have been the manager. The point is that the Belgium national team and the KBVB were in such a mess that Wilmots practically was the only one willing to take on the job. He's was second assistant of the previous manager, with hardly any experience. The situation of the Belgian national team was desperate and that wasn't his fault and he steadied the ship.

Of course he should have been replaced after the World Cup, but the Belgians as a people were to eager to celebrate that WC as a success. Tactically he was awful all along, but he kept Belgian national football alive and he kept the team together, and normal national managers don't have to do that and that was an achievement in itself. My point was there should be some appreciation for how bad things were and how he managed to put the national team in a situation where his own tactical ineptitude started to matter. Before him, Belgium had much problems than a tactical inept manager.
 

Ainu

Full Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2008
Messages
10,142
Location
Antwerp, Belgium
Basically I agree. He should never have been the manager. The point is that the Belgium national team and the KBVB were in such a mess that Wilmots practically was the only one willing to take on the job. He's was second assistant of the previous manager, with hardly any experience. The situation of the Belgian national team was desperate and that wasn't his fault and he steadied the ship.

Of course he should have been replaced after the World Cup, but the Belgians as a people were to eager to celebrate that WC as a success. Tactically he was awful all along, but he kept Belgian national football alive and he kept the team together, and normal national managers don't have to do that and that was an achievement in itself. My point was there should be some appreciation for how bad things were and how he managed to put the national team in a situation where his own tactical ineptitude started to matter. Before him, Belgium had much problems than a tactical inept manager.
I think you overstate his impact. We were getting somewhat better under Advocaat and Leekens and Wilmots was handed such an easy qualifying group for the World Cup that we would've gotten improved results with the talent available anyway, no matter the manager. He achieved the bare minimum.
 

Dr. Funkenstein

Not CAF Geert Wilders
Joined
May 20, 2014
Messages
1,713
I think you overstate his impact. We were getting somewhat better under Advocaat and Leekens and Wilmots was handed such an easy qualifying group for the World Cup that we would've gotten improved results with the talent available anyway, no matter the manager. He achieved the bare minimum.
I agree, but it's the Belgians as a nation who failed to have a well organized FA and the structure in place to just appoint an experienced capable manager. It's the Belgians as a nation that failed to acknowledge that they underachieved at the WC and the manager should be replaced. Of course a lot of Belgians did, but other interests than those of the football fan took precedence. You can't just take that out on Wilmots, if you hire someone with well known limitations, you can't hold those limitations against him. Hiring competent managers is the privilege of countries with the right structures surrounding the national team.