Usually around 11am I think. I think realistically in this market right now I’m not expecting it to fly back up to 60/70c+. I just think it’ll be one of the coins likely to hold against the tide or see a reasonable gain against BTC.
Fingers crossed. It's just on binance so an easy trade.
Christ he wouldn't shut up. Dimbleby should have kicked him out.
A few were talking about how more has to be done to protect the identity of those who've been accused, due to false allegations etc.
When he said his final piece about Maggie’s satue beating away protestors with an iron handbag you could see the reasonably hot girl who’d spoken a few minutes before give him such a condescending look with her arms folded as everyone else was clapping him
Gay farmer I reckon. Hates that women were allowed into the young farmers club and started stealing all his boys.
It’s a ridiculous idea. The percentage of convictions compared to estimated rape figures is already disproportionately low.
I'd imagine so - not exactly sure what the status would be though. There're probably plenty of cases where it'd look like the person was lying, but there's nowhere near enough evidence to bring that to a court of law. Which is of course the important part.
It is a difficult one. There have been a few blokes whose reputation has been completely destroyed and who've even spent years behind bars after being maliciously accused. They are the distinct minority though and I agree, with the dreadful rape conviction rate and the danger of woman not coming forward and reporting crime for fear of not being believed, on balance is women who need greater legal protection here, not men.
I agree with the last part, but I can't accept a few wrong convictions and destroyed reputations as collateral damage. That's the reason that they got rid of the death penalty, wasn't it?
It's not perfect, but it seems that you're going to get collateral damage on one side or the other.
Aye and that was my last point, given the choice would you rather be falsely accused of rape and have to deal with the consequences of that or your wife/mother/sister/daughter be the victim of an actual sexual assault, fail to make a conviction on the attacker and then have their name dragged out in public as the attacker calls them a liar?
There is obviously a difference between a failed rape claim and a malicious one- more arguments for naming if you get a serial one of the latter.
You are only looking at one side of the argument, what if the accused was your brother/father/husband?
OK I will reword it for you: given the choice would you rather your brother/father/husband be falsely accused of rape and have to deal with the consequences of that or your wife/mother/sister/daughter be the victim of an actual sexual assault, fail to make a conviction on the attacker and then have their name dragged out in public as the attacker calls them a liar?
Nope, still too much bias against the falsely accused.
So to get this straight, you'd rather the situation where a woman:
The problem is that there isn't just a 'nope' option. Either some men get hurt or a lot of women get hurt. Whatever you choose one or the other happens. It's one of the hardest criminal justice questions which is why it's been debated repeatedly over the years with no clear conclusions.
I agree, that's why I am saying you should not bias one side or the other, but see it from both sides. You would also have to look at each case on its own merits.
You have to have legal guidelines though, otherwise you end up with what justice you receive depending purely on the mood of the judge.
).
How can you have someone from the Express on a, supposedly, serious debate? Every single word in that paper is a lie.
