@Joga Bonito
I would like more information on this as I really don't want to spend a upgrade in defence... unless it's really flawed
I don't mind Burgnich there as a CB,
@Edgar Allan Pillow but the defensive sweeper role that he was supposedly playing in this game could perhaps have been expanded upon. I can understand why some might have an issue with him being a defensive sweeping CB - he did play that role at times but it wasn't his predominant role. He played as a RCB-RB in tandem with the tornante Jair and in line with Facchetti's movements on the left flank. As a pure man-marking CB I don't see many having an issue with him, but perhaps a more 'covering' type of a defender might have been a more suitable partner for Burgnich, rather than the aggressive man-marking Förster.
When you stated that you were using Burgnich as a sweeper, I kind of saw it as D.Santos playing Burgnich's usual role here and Burgnich playing Picchi's role. You were missing a
tornante but did have the young version of Schuster as the RCM and Raees did lack a proper wing presence on the left - Meazza was more of an inside forward and Schnellinger a right footed LB who didn't offer too much wingsmanship. I could have seen you pulling it off against Raees's forward line tbh but it didn't seem ideal for Sammer.
Anyway, moving forward, if I were you I would look more into D.Santos here - mainly to make Sammer's role more straightforward.