Rehab's Pete Doherty
- May 30, 2009
Bruv, I literally posted a video and multiple images that show it being the front half of the boot that makes contact.Bruv, you literally went and found pics showing that all four of Rashford’s back studs are white.
You can call me a liar and incorrectly describe both the incident and Rashford's boots all you want, but it doesn't make what you are saying true.Again I ask myself what do you gain form just lying?
Go to the video you posted.
Watch Rashford’s foot make contact.
Use your brain.
Re the boot comment - I assume, given this is what you did previously when you were clearly wrong, you’ve added a bit of a text wall because many don’t bother to read things or just assume you must be right to have given some examples. I was asking you to look at where the studs are and where the support starts because you are looking at pics of his studs making contact and saying his studs aren’t showing. I thought you were trolling, then thought actually maybe you genuinely couldn’t somehow see the studs, now I’m back to thinking you’re trolling.
I've just proven (at your request) that Rashford's studs (at least at the front half of his boot where contact was made) are very much not white and every image of the contact, including your shitty blurred image, shows the contact to be with a white part of the boot (i.e. the side of it).
What are you on about "where the support starts"? The boots are essentially colour coded to separate the sole/studs from the rest of the boot. You can literally see from the pictures of Rashford's boots and the video/images from the incident that the sole/studs are not white, then literally see the white part of his boot (i.e. the side of it) make contact with the Copenhagen player's leg, turn to show even more of the side of it up against his leg, slide down, and then plant studs on his ankle.
Again, do your eyes work?
Go the video I posted.
Watch Rashford's foot make contact.
Use your brain.