- Joined
- Apr 23, 2022
- Messages
- 584
Not that there’s anything wrong with that, right…?Another homo relationship in football
Not that there’s anything wrong with that, right…?Another homo relationship in football
Dzeko is also loyal to his wife.Poor Martinez, he could do a lot better than Romelu, I mean Dzeko is there and twice the man.
It ain’t cheating if its with the same sex, don’t you know this?Dzeko is also loyal to his wife.
How you still have the ability to posts tweets I'll never know. This really is the icing on the shite tweet cake from you.
What difference does it make to Chelsea fans how much he is sold for? Internet bragging rights are can be fun I guess.I hope Chelsea fans love watching Lukaku or selling him for 15m next summer
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Funds. Youre in a fight for top 4 now so every penny might count. There comes a time when your striker black hole has to stop, you’re not oil backed anymore. You must still owe Inter a good 60 odd million yet that needs to be paid as well.What difference does it make to Chelsea fans how much he is sold for?
Top 4 is irrelevant, we're winning the Champions League.Funds. Youre in a fight for top 4 now so every penny might count.
Maguire at £120 million was worse.Didn’t realise he’s 30 in May!
£100m. Must be up there with one of the worst transfers of all time? Another loan to Inter next year and he’ll go for a nominal fee. Also looks like injuries are now creeping in which was always going to be the case for an explosive player with such a big frame.
Disaster.
Love this, someone points out this was a poor purchase and you pipe up "Yea, well you did worse!", it's what's wrong with the internet, it's ok to acknowledge and even agree that it was a bad decision and you don't have to find a worse one in some strange way to justify this one.Maguire at £120 million was worse.
Hazard to RM is worse than both, so i'm here to say that "WE did worse", take that.Love this, someone points out this was a poor purchase and you pipe up "Yea, well you did worse!", it's what's wrong with the internet, it's ok to acknowledge and even agree that it was a bad decision and you don't have to find a worse one in some strange way to justify this one.
Yeah, it's definately what's wrong with the Internet.Love this, someone points out this was a poor purchase and you pipe up "Yea, well you did worse!", it's what's wrong with the internet, it's ok to acknowledge and even agree that it was a bad decision and you don't have to find a worse one in some strange way to justify this one.
I don’t get it? He wasn’tMaguire at £120 million was worse.
I say it's worse purely because we held our hands up within a year whereas you're still trying to make it work with Maguire.I don’t get it? He wasn’t
Maguire wasn’t a good signing though but his fee and salary are not in the same ball park as Lukaku.
I guess looking back Chelsea have made some expend dud signings of late. The recruitment definitely needs an overhaul.
Can't laugh at these sort of things because that's exactly how Chelsea work.Top 4 is irrelevant, we're winning the Champions League.
I can’t see how it’s the same. We got two top 4 places with him as our best CB.I say it's worse purely because we held our hands up within a year whereas you're still trying to make it work with Maguire.
Him started the season over 4x UCL winning Varane (and probably would have carried on doing so had he not been beyond bad in the opening two fixtures) was one of the most bizarre decisions I've ever seen.
You’ve got the money to just write things off like that though. Much like City and PSG. It may change now following the take over and you’ll need to be more careful with your signings without that safety net. Your last few transfer windows have been hideous in terms of expense and end product really.I say it's worse purely because we held our hands up within a year whereas you're still trying to make it work with Maguire.
Him started the season over 4x UCL winning Varane (and probably would have carried on doing so had he not been beyond bad in the opening two fixtures) was one of the most bizarre decisions I've ever seen.
It's a lot easier to move on a player like Lukaku who has a good goalscoring record than it is with someone like Maguire. We managed to do it ourselves when Inter bought him in the first place!I say it's worse purely because we held our hands up within a year whereas you're still trying to make it work with Maguire.
Him started the season over 4x UCL winning Varane (and probably would have carried on doing so had he not been beyond bad in the opening two fixtures) was one of the most bizarre decisions I've ever seen.
seems a bit OTT.I say it's worse purely because we held our hands up within a year whereas you're still trying to make it work with Maguire.
Him started the season over 4x UCL winning Varane (and probably would have carried on doing so had he not been beyond bad in the opening two fixtures) was one of the most bizarre decisions I've ever seen.
He was like that at Everton. I remember the 1-1 draw at Old Trafford, when Ibrahimovic scored a penalty in the last minutes.I'm curious as to when he became so insecure as to blame absolutely everyone else for his own shortcomings. I can't say that I recall any such behaviour when he was at Everton or West Brom. Was he always so defensive about his contributions?
Inter don’t have an obligation to buy, right? He’ll be on the conductor belt for loans across European clubs for a while. He’s contracted at Chelsea until 2026.Having the worst season in his career since he broke out at WBA, last year at Chelsea was the first season in a decade that he failed to score at least 20 in all competitions and at least 10 in the league. Well on his way to repeating that, he has the worst scoring ratio he's had in this period as well - 0.36 goals per 90 in Serie A this year. This is even worse than last year in the PL (0.45 goals per 90).
Now, what is Lukaku worth when he doesn't score?
I view Ten Hag and Maguire similar to Potter and Mendy. Potter wants a keeper to play a specific way and do specific things, so Kepa was the better choice for him.You’ve got the money to just write things off like that though. Much like City and PSG. It may change now following the take over and you’ll need to be more careful with your signings without that safety net. Your last few transfer windows have been hideous in terms of expense and end product really.
Re Ten Hag. Don’t think it was an odd decision really. He gave him a chance then quickly moved away from him. When you’re coming in to a new club that’s what you do for a number of reasons.
He is the definition of fake fan. Claims to have been a Chelsea fan since he was 10. He was born in 1993. Guess who bought Chelsea in 2003."My dream is to play for ManUtd"
nek minnit
"I love Inter, this is my place"
nek minnit
"I love Chelsea and belong in PL"
next minnit
"I love Inter fans and Italy"
I'm fairly certain that stadium tour was a PR stunt which unfortunately we fell for.He is the definition of fake fan. Claims to have been a Chelsea fan since he was 10. He was born in 1993. Guess who bought Chelsea in 2003.
I am waiting for the day he comes full circle and says that United is where his heart is"My dream is to play for ManUtd"
nek minnit
"I love Inter, this is my place"
nek minnit
"I love Chelsea and belong in PL"
next minnit
"I love Inter fans and Italy"