Russian invasion of Ukraine | Fewer tweets, more discussion

TheLiverBird

Full Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2014
Messages
1,708
80% of Russia’s forces are now in attack positions

it’s pretty much nailed on there will be a full scale military invasion.
 

Water Melon

Guest
Russia replaced the dollar mainly with Gold and Chinese Renminbis, not with Russian Rubles.

Their economy is now more resistant to sanctions than it was in 2014, and the slowed growth was actually in part done for that exact reason (the article I posted above explains how).

China won't need to donate any money to Russia, just sell them what they need and buy their gas, oil and agricultural products (even at a discount) will be enough for Russia to survive, especially considering the oil/gas prices will be higher anyway because of the sanctions.

Of course the sanctions will hurt, and there is still no way to predict for sure what effect they will have, but talking about Russia crumbling with certainty in the face of sanctions is not quite clear to me at the moment at least.
The article is a bit sensationalist and the figures there are not really trustworthy. The gas contract has been signed long term and favours China massively. In terms of agriculture, Russia imports quite a lot and exports so much less. One of their main drivers, the military industry is already lagging behind and will have even fewer customers from now on. Now imagine being not able to loan money from the west, disconnected from swift and having no access to simple crystals to do chips and semiconductors, while being at war and having to invest in the occupied territories. If the world powers are serious about sanctions, it will be very painful for Russia. Neighbouring countries will queue up for NATO membership too.
 

TMDaines

Fun sponge.
Joined
Sep 1, 2014
Messages
14,004
That's exactly the vibe I'm getting, I don't think they expect Ukraine to last long anyway despite all this talk about Ukraine having a vastly improved army now. Don't forget, a few months ago we also heard a lot about how the US built a good army in Afghanistan which can show real resistance against Taliban when US leaves, only to discover the next day what they secretly knew all along.
You are drawing the wrong lesson from Afghanistan in my view. Afghanistan shows that it is very difficult to bring a large country to heel when you have a critical mass of people with the will and the resources to resist. These last eight years have really hardened Ukrainians against a Putin-led Russia. Ukrainians will have far more desire to defend Ukraine than Russians will have to capture it.

If Russia occupies all of Ukraine, that state will have no stability for the foreseeable future and you will see a lot of resistance.
 

nimic

something nice
Scout
Joined
Aug 2, 2006
Messages
31,505
Location
And I'm all out of bubblegum.
You are drawing the wrong lesson from Afghanistan in my view. Afghanistan shows that it is very difficult to bring a large country to heel when you have a critical mass of people with the will and the resources to resist. These last eight years have really hardened Ukrainians against a Putin-led Russia. Ukrainians will have far more desire to defend Ukraine than Russians will have to capture it.

If Russia occupies all of Ukraine, that state will have no stability for the foreseeable future and you will see a lot of resistance.
Not sure that comparison is very valid either, to be honest. Afghanistan is a vastly more traditional, tribal and rural society than Ukraine. We could definitely see guerilla warfare and some kind of resistance, but the Russian army will have a much easier time actually locking down the country than the US/Afghan government did in Afghanistan.
 

Sir Matt

Blue Devil
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Messages
18,327
Location
LUHG
Well west hasn’t really provided any arms to Ukraine that are worth any salt. If it was serious about defending Ukraine we would have seen the arm supplies with aerial capabilities which they badly lack. Germany sent them some helmets ffs…If you consider this as a real support then I don’t know what to say. We’re not giving them even a chance here with our inaction…
The US tried to send them Iron Dome missiles, but Israel blocked it since they are jointly developed. The West can't start supplying planes without people to fly them. The failure to provide Surface-to-Air missiles and radar systems will be a disaster though. Supposedly it was too late to provide them with Patriot missiles since there'd be no time to train them. Let's hope their Buks work like they did against MH-17 (:rolleyes:).
 

2cents

Historiographer, and obtainer of rare antiquities
Scout
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
16,293
Not sure that comparison is very valid either, to be honest. Afghanistan is a vastly more traditional, tribal and rural society than Ukraine. We could definitely see guerilla warfare and some kind of resistance, but the Russian army will have a much easier time actually locking down the country than the US/Afghan government did in Afghanistan.
Afghanistan also very mountainous terrain, in contrast to mostly flat Ukraine (certainly east Ukraine).
 

TMDaines

Fun sponge.
Joined
Sep 1, 2014
Messages
14,004
Not sure that comparison is very valid either, to be honest. Afghanistan is a vastly more traditional, tribal and rural society than Ukraine. We could definitely see guerilla warfare and some kind of resistance, but the Russian army will have a much easier time actually locking down the country than the US/Afghan government did in Afghanistan.
A puppet state has no chance of stability in Ukraine now. Maidan showed what Ukrainians are now willing to do to get change and that resolve has only been strengthened over eight years.

It’s one thing to capture and occupy a country. It’s another thing to be able to make the state function once it is under your control, particularly when most of the rest of the world will be supporting the resistance.

I don’t have too much doubt that Ukraine will fall if Russia push hard enough and the West doesn’t offer direct support. I do doubt whether Russia can seize genuine control of Ukraine though.
 

tomaldinho1

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
17,866
Well west hasn’t really provided any arms to Ukraine that are worth any salt. If it was serious about defending Ukraine we would have seen the arm supplies with aerial capabilities which they badly lack. Germany sent them some helmets ffs…If you consider this as a real support then I don’t know what to say. We’re not giving them even a chance here with our inaction…
I don’t think that’s true, we don’t know quantities but anti air and anti tank is documented as being sent. One thing we really don’t know is how much NATO have done, we might have armed Ukraine to the teeth or literally sent them a couple of javelins and a pat on the back.
 

Simbo

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2010
Messages
5,230
Airspace closure notices been put out now for North-Eastern Ukraine by both Ukraine and Russia.
 

Suv666

Full Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Messages
8,773
If they fight out in the open they won't, which they won't. The majority of the fighting will be in built up areas, where they may be able to hold out a while using all the tactics of urban warfare.

Problem with that is the utter devastation it means for cities and civilians. The Russian land army is weighted considearbly toward mass artillary bombardment, with not much concern for accuracy.

To avoid Russian casualties they may just surround the main cities, cutting off all electricity, communication, supplies and starve them out.

Man even talking about this shit seems so surreal. The West fecked this up bad. Ukraine's future looks bleak at best.
 

Danny1982

Sectarian Hipster
Joined
Aug 18, 2009
Messages
15,091
Location
Old Trafford
The article is a bit sensationalist and the figures there are not really trustworthy. The gas contract has been signed long term and favours China massively. In terms of agriculture, Russia imports quite a lot and exports so much less. One of their main drivers, the military industry is already lagging behind and will have even fewer customers from now on. Now imagine being not able to loan money from the west, disconnected from swift and having no access to simple crystals to do chips and semiconductors, while being at war and having to invest in the occupied territories. If the world powers are serious about sanctions, it will be very painful for Russia. Neighbouring countries will queue up for NATO membership too.
Russia doesn't have to make a profit from their deal with China, Russia's aim is to survive here. Also bear in mind, if the US and Europe go all in against Russia then they're also bound to get some pain from these measures, and I can assure you the majority of people in Europe are not ready to pay a price for Ukraine. In fact, they did a referendum a few years ago in the Netherlands about a mere deal for economic cooperation with Ukraine and the majority (62%) voted against it because they think it will be disadvantageous for them. It's a cruel world I know, but the reality is Ukraine means, after all, much more to Russia than to Europe, something which Obama correctly recognized several years ago. So if Russia can survive a few years, you also have to factor in the other side tiring or giving up.
 

BayernFan87

Full Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2014
Messages
1,613
Supports
Bayern Munich
The "support" by the Germans up to the pipeline freeze was nothing short of pathetic.
Germanys stance is to not distribute lethal weapons into crisis areas. Ukraine is no member of NATO. What did you expect?

I don't think this is good. I think they could at least make exceptions for defensive weapons. But Germanys position was pretty clear.

Don't forget that we have a very special place in the history of wars and that sometimes we maybe don't act enough and are to neutral and passive for a nation of our size and power due to that.


The "pathetic" pipeline freeze was not a minor thing though. The immediate reaction of Medwedew proves that.
 

Neo_Mufc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2009
Messages
10,162
What sanctions (if any) would make Putin stop or has he completely gone past caring?
 

VorZakone

What would Kenny G do?
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
32,995
What sanctions (if any) would make Putin stop or has he completely gone past caring?
We'll pretty much only know this if he escalates. Then the West will throw extremely heavy sanctions at him.
 

The Firestarter

Full Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2010
Messages
28,237
Germanys stance is to not distribute lethal weapons into crisis areas. Ukraine is no member of NATO. What did you expect?

I don't think this is good. I think they could at least make exceptions for defensive weapons. But Germanys position was pretty clear.

Don't forget that we have a very special place in the history of wars and that sometimes we maybe don't act enough and are to neutral and passive for a nation of our size and power due to that.


The "pathetic" pipeline freeze was not a minor thing though. The immediate reaction of Medwedew proves that.
Yeah maybe supply something that shoots down planes bombing kindergartens , not helmets. Nobody is asking you to give actual fighter jets or ballistic missiles. And I said pathetic up to the pipeline freeze.
 

Simbo

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2010
Messages
5,230
Man even talking about this shit seems so surreal. The West fecked this up bad. Ukraine's future looks bleak at best.
This is literally all down to one insecure man/cnut and he isn't in the west.
 

TMDaines

Fun sponge.
Joined
Sep 1, 2014
Messages
14,004

:mad:
Having the same frustrations watching the BBC and DW in recent days, although the Newsnight presenter on BBC2 was much more on the ball tonight. Other nights the entire crisis has been talked through from the Putin perspective.
 

WPMUFC

Full Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2013
Messages
9,657
Location
Australia
Having the same frustrations watching the BBC and DW in recent days, although the Newsnight presenter on BBC2 was much more on the ball tonight. Other nights the entire crisis has been talked through from the Putin perspective.
20 years of Afghanistan and Iraq has broken peoples brains. This continued inability of people to understand that multiple things can be true and that if the US says X that it must really mean Y is fecking infuriating. This fake balance that "well obviously Putin must have some rational position" is completely at odds with historic reality of unhinged autocrat when they get into this level of expansionist fever.
 

Danny1982

Sectarian Hipster
Joined
Aug 18, 2009
Messages
15,091
Location
Old Trafford
You are drawing the wrong lesson from Afghanistan in my view. Afghanistan shows that it is very difficult to bring a large country to heel when you have a critical mass of people with the will and the resources to resist. These last eight years have really hardened Ukrainians against a Putin-led Russia. Ukrainians will have far more desire to defend Ukraine than Russians will have to capture it.

If Russia occupies all of Ukraine, that state will have no stability for the foreseeable future and you will see a lot of resistance.
I agree with you largely here, in fact I already stated before that if Putin goes for all of Ukraine then it might backfire. However, there are a couple of points where I probably differ with you.

First, I think Eastern Ukraine is a different story, I think Russia will have no problem controlling these areas and they will be relatively stable thanks to a considerable Russian constituency there.

Second, I think Ukrainians are different from the Taliban, an ideological religious group who live to fight for their ideology and have no interest in a peaceful civilian life. Ukrainians are different. Yes, they can protest (which could lead to some instability), but it's unlikely that they're gonna be able to form an effective and sustainable armed resistance.

But I agree, if Putin goes all in and takes all of Ukraine, it could lead to years of instability, and it's unclear how it will end.
 

VorZakone

What would Kenny G do?
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
32,995
Macron with words of support. Though one wonders if this is another indication that an attack is coming.

 

Don't Kill Bill

Full Member
Joined
May 14, 2006
Messages
5,674
I don't know why people think any sanctions would be spared against Russia. Clearly maximum sanctions will be implemented against Russia, the real question is how much it will actually hurt them. Russia has been learning from the sanctions in 2014 and preparing for further sanctions ever since, and they have taken many measures to diminish their effect, a few examples mentioned in the article below. Additionally, Russia sold almost all of their stockpile in the US treasury bonds in the last few years (which was around $150 billion in 2013) to avoid having them frozen or taken by the US at any point (like they did with Afghanistan). And on top of all that, alienating China in the last couple of years will definitely weaken these sanctions considerably.


Russia's plan to fight back against Western sanctions





https://www.bbc.com/news/business-60480904
The sanctions are not on yet and the graph doesn't include the cost of the military buildup and sustaining 200000 troops in the field in a fighting war. Six to eight months of sustaining this effort without Ukrainian capitulation and the Russian economy collapses is the estimate.