Russian invasion of Ukraine | Fewer tweets, more discussion

stefan92

Full Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2021
Messages
6,515
Supports
Hannover 96
Maybe I am wrong, but I could have sworn I have read condemnations of other countries in recent history who kept their prisoners incarcerated and left to fend for themselves unarmed, even whilst cities were being razed around them.
It's one thing letting people behind to die, it's another thing to allow people to leave prison to join the army.

And while it's inhuman to leave prisoners locked in a burning and exploding jail, it is not exactly against any war convention, but rather a breaking of the human rights charta I think.
 

LARulz

Full Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2009
Messages
18,201
Can someone just help make sure I am not misunderstanding

Why are the EU so desperate for Ukraine to join the EU right now? Does that not cause a massive issue if Russia is still trying to invade because then it's a case of Russia vs the EU who then all need to get involved? And then NATO?
 

Tarrou

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
25,648
Location
Sydney
this is mostly delusional bollocks though isn’t it?

Ukrainians weren’t that bothered about joining until Putin stole Crimea from them in 2014, is he really surprised public opinion turned after he literally invaded them? Of course not it’s exactly how you’d expect it to go

and Russia already borders NATO countries so why do they need to invade Ukraine to stop NATO lining up some missiles? It’s horseshit
 

horsechoker

The Caf's Roy Keane.
Joined
Apr 16, 2015
Messages
52,442
Location
The stable
Can someone just help make sure I am not misunderstanding

Why are the EU so desperate for Ukraine to join the EU right now? Does that not cause a massive issue if Russia is still trying to invade because then it's a case of Russia vs the EU who then all need to get involved? And then NATO?
Ukraine might have to give up certain territories if wants to join the EU. An accord would have to be reached.

People often talk about joining the EU like it's Netflix *cough* Scotland *cough* but it's not such an easy process.
 

Sarni

nice guy, unassuming, objective United fan.
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Messages
57,786
Location
Krakow
It's not PoWs you muppet. It is people who were in prison in Ukraine prior to the war, who are within scope of conscription. Keeping them imprisoned and maintaining their incarceration would stop being viable at some point anyway, especially when prison staff will be needed in the war effort too.
Ah I also thought these were Russian prisoners as this is how it got reported in Polish media at first. If it's regular prisoners then it's fair game. Should not say they will put them in heated areas though, just that they will be fighting.
 

DickDastardly

New Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2015
Messages
7,298
Location
Mean machine 00
Does Ukraine have a death penalty in their judicial system?

Imagine making a combat unit out of those awaiting the death penalty.
Wrap them with C4 and bubblewrap the feck out of them and just roll them down the hill.
 

hasanejaz88

Full Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2017
Messages
5,939
Location
Munich
Supports
Germany
One point I'll make, and not to seem like I'm pro-Russian, is that we need to be vary of the mistakes made after World War 1 to not completely humiliate the Russians following any negotiations, and provoke a worse response in future years.

We've seen that their economy can be devastated following the sanctions. That, coupled with the humiliation of not being able to conquer Ukraine, could have an extreme impact on the population and leaders, who can be very nationalistic.

Ofcourse Russia is 100% wrong in what they've done, but with peace talks we should negotiate that they completely withdraw from Ukraine but then lift sanctions put on them (if possible also the resignation of Putin) so that they don't fall into economic despair, like what happened in Germany after WW1.

Hopefully Russia would have learnt their lesson that they cannot attack a country that has the support of NATO (feel free to march eastward towards Arabia though :D). With that lesson we can allow them back into the world economy and not sever relations entirely
 

Deery

Dreary
Joined
May 21, 2019
Messages
18,590
Talks have started on the Belarus border, Ukrainians asking for Russia to pull out and a ceasefire.
 

stefan92

Full Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2021
Messages
6,515
Supports
Hannover 96
Can someone just help make sure I am not misunderstanding

Why are the EU so desperate for Ukraine to join the EU right now? Does that not cause a massive issue if Russia is still trying to invade because then it's a case of Russia vs the EU who then all need to get involved? And then NATO?
It does, and that's the point. Letting Ukraine join the EU while being at war would immediately mean the whole EU had to join the war (as this is part of the Lissabon treaty), and therefore obviously would also in one the rest of the Nato by proxy. It's just the ultimate threat the EU has against Russia to make them retreat.
 

Natener

Full Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2011
Messages
1,930
Let the killers do the killing eh?

Desperate times call for desperate measures.

Wouldn't want to be their commander though. Some sleepless nights await anyone in charge of that group.
Most prisoners are not killers doing life sentences. I doubt they are sending people who are too dangerous to let out.
 

led_scholes

Full Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2012
Messages
2,463
Let the killers do the killing eh?

Desperate times call for desperate measures.

Wouldn't want to be their commander though. Some sleepless nights await anyone in charge of that group.
Didnt they Russians do that against Napoleon when they abandoned Moscow? They let the prisoners loose just to loot things and make it impossible for the french to find food and worhty goods.
 

tomaldinho1

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
17,867
Can't disagree with him.
I’m torn because obviously things should be solved by discussion not conflict (I doubt anyone disagrees) but I feel like a lot of people ‘blaming’ expansion against Russia are ignoring the fact that Putin hasn’t exactly made Russia an attractive proposition for its former USSR territories. Why should Ukraine pay for his domestic failures as President? If they see a better future for their people why shouldn’t they be allowed to apply to the EU, NATO or whatever they want without fear of invasion?
 

VorZakone

What would Kenny G do?
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
33,014
One point I'll make, and not to seem like I'm pro-Russian, is that we need to be vary of the mistakes made after World War 1 to not completely humiliate the Russians following any negotiations, and provoke a worse response in future years.

We've seen that their economy can be devastated following the sanctions. That, coupled with the humiliation of not being able to conquer Ukraine, could have been extreme impact on the prison population and leaders, who can be very nationalistic.

Ofcourse Russia is 100% wrong in what they've done, but with peace talks we should negotiate that they completely withdraw from Ukraine but then lift sanctions put on them (if possible also the resignation of Putin). so that they don't fall into economic despair, like what happened in Germany after WW1.

Hopefully Russia would have learnt their lesson that they cannot attack a country that has the support of NATO (feel free to march eastward towards Arabia though :D). With that lesson we can allow them back into the world economy and not sever relations entirely
Indeed, we should be wary of angering the Russian public long term because new leaders might exploit that. Japan under the US umbrella is an interesting case study with regards to helping a country after they've been 'punished'.
 

MDFC Manager

Full Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2005
Messages
24,313
I'm guessing here, it's probably prisoners who are close to parole/on good behaviour who are being given the task, rather than rapists and the like
 

stefan92

Full Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2021
Messages
6,515
Supports
Hannover 96
One point I'll make, and not to seem like I'm pro-Russian, is that we need to be vary of the mistakes made after World War 1 to not completely humiliate the Russians following any negotiations, and provoke a worse response in future years.

We've seen that their economy can be devastated following the sanctions. That, coupled with the humiliation of not being able to conquer Ukraine, could have an extreme impact on the population and leaders, who can be very nationalistic.

Ofcourse Russia is 100% wrong in what they've done, but with peace talks we should negotiate that they completely withdraw from Ukraine but then lift sanctions put on them (if possible also the resignation of Putin) so that they don't fall into economic despair, like what happened in Germany after WW1.

Hopefully Russia would have learnt their lesson that they cannot attack a country that has the support of NATO (feel free to march eastward towards Arabia though :D). With that lesson we can allow them back into the world economy and not sever relations entirely
Absolutely agree. It should be our goal to remove Putin, create some disarmament treaty and most importantly essentially allow the Russians to blame this stuff on Putin and his close advisors. That way they could save their face and return to our common economical system.
 

golden_blunder

Site admin. Manchester United fan
Staff
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
120,154
Location
Dublin, Ireland
Sending prisoners of war into the hottest spots is morally questionable to say the least. I realise, they're at war and difficult decisions have to be made but not sure I agree with that one. If a PoW is willing to fight for them they deserve lauding, not putting into a position where they are more likely to be killed.
The way i read it is that it’s prisoners who were already in jail prior to the war not POWs.
The only objection I’d have is in regards to murderers being used because they could be psychopaths
 

NoLogo

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2009
Messages
19,892
Location
I can't remember why I joined this war.
Totally never said that, but go off. I don't at all agree with the invasion. All i'm saying is that Putin has a legitimate reason to be aggrieved (I understand better the complexity around the issue now) not that he is justified in his disproportionate escalation and nuclear threats. The west was never going roll back the expansion to pre 1997 levels but maybe some truce could have been made on Ukraine if negotiations could have been allowed to continue before he decided to go full madman Putler mode.
No he doesn't. Until 2014 we were all on cooperative terms with Russia, no one saw them as an enemy but as a partner in many things. This is all of Putin's own making, the fact that NATO now is a threat to them as well, before that no NATO nation ever attempted any military aggression against Russia. Don't buy the Kremlin propaganda, the only thing Putin is worried about is that the democratic movements in Ukraine and Belarus are going to cost him his regime, that's why he attacked Ukraine, he can't have them be a democratic state, the NATO thing is a fecking excuse preying on old Cold War fears.
 
Last edited:

Classical Mechanic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2014
Messages
35,216
Location
xG Zombie Nation
No he doesn't. Until 2014 we were all on cooperative terms with Russia, no one saw them as an enemy but as a partner in many things. This is all of Putin's own making, the fact that NATO now is a threat to them as well, before that no NATO nation ever attempted any military aggression against Russia. Don't buy the Kremlin propaganda, the only thing Putin is worried about is that the democratic movements in Ukraine and Belarus are going to cost him his regime, that's why he attacked Ukraine, he can't have them be a democratic state, the NATO thing is a fecking excuse playing on old Cold War fears.
To follow on from that, Putin has committed so many crimes against Russia that if he loses his regime then he loses his life. He's the archetypal prisoner of power.
 

Mihai

Full Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2013
Messages
4,621
Does Ukraine have a death penalty in their judicial system?

Imagine making a combat unit out of those awaiting the death penalty.
Wrap them with C4 and bubblewrap the feck out of them and just roll them down the hill.
Capital punishment was abolished in 2000.
 

Dan_F

Full Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
10,416
Most prisoners are not killers doing life sentences. I doubt they are sending people who are too dangerous to let out.
They sound like the exactly the kind of people who you’d want fighting in war ironically.
 

ColoRed

Full Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
667
Location
deep in the west where the sun gets dusty
Supports
Cologne / Manchester
Absolutely agree. It should be our goal to remove Putin, create some disarmament treaty and most importantly essentially allow the Russians to blame this stuff on Putin and his close advisors. That way they could save their face and return to our common economical system.
Yep. We have to make it clear to the Russians that there is a way out of all sanctions and that there is a way back to negotiations if a ceasefire is reached. But Putin must go.
 

Smores

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
25,548
No he doesn't. Until 2014 we were all on cooperative terms with Russia, no one saw them as an enemy but as a partner in many things. This is all of Putin's own making, the fact that NATO now is a threat to them as well, before that no NATO nation ever attempted any military aggression against Russia. Don't buy the Kremlin propaganda, the only thing Putin is worried about is that the democratic movements in Ukraine and Belarus are going to cost him his regime, that's why he attacked Ukraine, he can't have them be a democratic state, the NATO thing is a fecking excuse playing on old Cold War fears.
You're conflating justification with a geopolitical reality and then ranting about a point not made.

NATO expansion is a valid security threat, the fact current NATO isn't a threat isn't relevant because its about what may happen in decades time. That's how all major players think in regards to non-allied forces (and Russia are pretending to be one at this stage).

Is it anything to do with this war? Very little. Is accepting it as valid remotely justifying Russian aggression? No
 

Sarni

nice guy, unassuming, objective United fan.
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Messages
57,786
Location
Krakow
You're conflating justification with a geopolitical reality and then ranting about a point not made.

NATO expansion is a valid security threat, the fact current NATO isn't a threat isn't relevant because its about what may happen in decades time. That's how all major players think in regards to non-allied forces (and Russia are pretending to be one at this stage).

Is it anything to do with this war? Very little. Is accepting it as valid remotely justifying Russian aggression? No
I think we should stop discussing whether NATO is a threat to Russia or not when Putin has explicitly explained what this war is about. It’s a topic for another discussion altogether.
 

spiriticon

Full Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
7,449
Even if Putin views NATO expansion as a threat (and I actually sympathise with him on this one, but not much), this is a totally diplomatic issue and in no way allows him an excuse to invade a country. Twice.

The man has gone mad. That is the problem.
 

AngeloHenriquez

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2009
Messages
13,455
Location
Location Location
Supports
Stevenage
Are people genuinely expecting this to calm down today? I'm not well versed as I don't have a deep enough understanding of the political background here but what are the chances of some sort agreement that will see an end to this?
 

sun_tzu

The Art of Bore
Joined
Aug 23, 2010
Messages
19,536
Location
Still waiting for the Youthquake
Are people genuinely expecting this to calm down today? I'm not well versed as I don't have a deep enough understanding of the political background here but what are the chances of some sort agreement that will see an end to this?
An end... Unlikely ... A pause or de-escalation is likely if an agreement is reached

Now if it will be stuck to that's another question

And what happens if an agreement is not reached is a pretty horrible prospect