Ryan Fraser on a free

AlwaysRed66

Full Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2016
Messages
1,800
Not sure there's a club out there stupid enough to spend £30m on Lingard.
Isn't Lingard on 100,000pw. The offers will be flooding in.
 

Walters_19_MuFc

Full Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2013
Messages
18,836
Location
Birmingham
Good player, and I'd be all over it if we got James, but we need a specialist right winger next season, rather than a player like Fraser who can play on the right but is more comfortable on the left.

That said, if he's free, then he, James, Rashford and New Winger would be good options to have.
 

DanNistelrooy

Lineup Prediction & Last Man Standing winner 2017
Joined
Mar 19, 2006
Messages
8,499
Location
W3104
Admittedly I've only seen a handful of games where Dan James is playing but he actually really reminds me of Ryan Fraser in terms of style (and stature come to think of it!). Not sure if we would need two of the same player but I do rate him.
 

SungSam7

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 29, 2016
Messages
148
Location
Waterford
He is better on the left...
That's not saying much for Rashford then because he's a chronic winger on the left.
 

VeevaVee

despite the protests, wears Ugg boots
Scout
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
34,442
Location
Manchester
Admittedly I've only seen a handful of games where Dan James is playing but he actually really reminds me of Ryan Fraser in terms of style (and stature come to think of it!). Not sure if we would need two of the same player but I do rate him.
A bench option/cover is ideal though for me. I'd like him plus a big RW signing *cough Sancho cough*
 

Red_toad

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2010
Messages
7,184
Location
DownUnder
A bench option/cover is ideal though for me. I'd like him plus a big RW signing *cough Sancho cough*
Sancho isn’t going to sign for any club without Champions league football. I’m really not getting why anyone would think we stand a chance of getting him. We need to build a team that can compete for a champions league spot, we certainly look well short of that presently.
Fraser could strengthen our options, as our attackers seem to be made of glass.
 

No Love

Full Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2013
Messages
1,022
Would definitely take Fraser, he’s a good little player. Get him in.
 

dev1l

Full Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2006
Messages
7,592
Good player, and I'd be all over it if we got James, but we need a specialist right winger next season, rather than a player like Fraser who can play on the right but is more comfortable on the left.

That said, if he's free, then he, James, Rashford and New Winger would be good options to have.
If that s true, why should we get another players who s comfortable mainly on the left.. We have James, Rashford and also Chong
 

VeevaVee

despite the protests, wears Ugg boots
Scout
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
34,442
Location
Manchester
Sancho isn’t going to sign for any club without Champions league football. I’m really not getting why anyone would think we stand a chance of getting him. We need to build a team that can compete for a champions league spot, we certainly look well short of that presently.
Fraser could strengthen our options, as our attackers seem to be made of glass.
I think we have a chance if we're promising other signings, personally. Agree that Fraser would help with some much needed depth.
 

ThierryHenry14

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 30, 2015
Messages
676
Supports
Arsenal
I remembered we were interested back in summer but couldn't agree on fee. I am not surprised if we come back with another offer in January.
 

Noc-Z

ffs
Joined
Jun 17, 2014
Messages
970
Location
Fergie's Backyard.
He's good but James looks best played on the left. He's doing well too. What would the plan be? James and Fraser battle it out for the left?

I'd sign a striker and a RW (Werner and Sancho please!) before I looked at the LW spot.

Come to think of it I'd probably sign...2 CMs, a RW, a ST and a LB before I looked at signing another LW!
 

3KDré

Full Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2015
Messages
5,299
Rashford should be our backup left winger, which means I would prioritise a backup striker.
 

Lee565

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2019
Messages
1,013
Hasnt he been playing on the right recently? He seems almost like he doesn't have much of a weaker foot.
 

Sparky Rhiwabon

Full Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2013
Messages
10,195
Good player, albeit a bit square. Created the most big chances in Europe after Hazard last season. Or some such stat.
 

Lee565

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2019
Messages
1,013
Kinda amazed that we are to the bare bones of a squad but fans dont want a player that's hardworking, productive, technically sound, brilliant from set pieces, british, strong on his weak foot and premier league proven?

Most fans agree West ham had a better attack than ours on Sunday but Fraser is better than yarmenlenko, if our club snub this guy in January then it shows how awful our planning is of recruitment.
 

ThierryHenry14

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 30, 2015
Messages
676
Supports
Arsenal
Do you think Saka’s development can change that?
Saka is only 18 year old and he is not ready as a starter yet. Ryan Fraser will be available for a cut price sale in January or even free for next summer. He is at his prime right now and his salary probably not going to be over 150k/week so there is no reason not to bid for his service. You will never have too much quality in your team and competition is a good thing. We are not like Man City and has 2 quality players fight for each position. Whether he will pick us ahead of other interested parties is another story.
 

Mark Pawelek

Full Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2014
Messages
1,376
Location
Kent, near London
If that s true, why should we get another players who s comfortable mainly on the left.. We have James, Rashford and also Chong
He can play either on the left or right. He's right footed. From the left, he can cut inside to shoot, or actually go outside and cross properly with his left. From the right, he can go outside to cross with his right. He's not going to be so good cutting inside from the right. He will be a massive upgrade on Lingard, Mata, or Pereira as he's a natural winger and a proven goal threat.

We need to fix the squad. That means replacing all the broken players and bringing in whomever we can get.
  • Ivan Rakitic to replace Matic (Garner as Rakitic's apprentice)
  • Fraser to replace Lingard and Pereira (James as Fraser's apprentice)
  • Mertens to replace Mata. (Greenwood as Mertens' apprentice)
The 3 players I want were all goal threats last season in Serie A or Premiership. They will fix 3 positions. They should only cost £50m total because 2 have contracts ending next June and the other wants to leave Barca, and Barca are in financial distress again. So must raise some money. OK, they are aged 30, 32, and 25. But we have some good youth players who will be apprentices to them.

Please forget about the £90m players. Glazers will only give you money for 1 per season. It will take forever to fix the squad with £90m players.
 

bond19821982

Full Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
3,116
He can play either on the left or right. He's right footed. From the left, he can cut inside to shoot, or actually go outside and cross properly with his left. From the right, he can go outside to cross with his right. He's not going to be so good cutting inside from the right. He will be a massive upgrade on Lingard, Mata, or Pereira as he's a natural winger and a proven goal threat.

We need to fix the squad. That means replacing all the broken players and bringing in whomever we can get.
  • Ivan Rakitic to replace Matic (Garner as Rakitic's apprentice)
  • Fraser to replace Lingard and Pereira (James as Fraser's apprentice)
  • Mertens to replace Mata. (Greenwood as Mertens' apprentice)
The 3 players I want were all goal threats last season in Serie A or Premiership. They will fix 3 positions. They should only cost £50m total because 2 have contracts ending next June and the other wants to leave Barca, and Barca are in financial distress again. So must raise some money. OK, they are aged 30, 32, and 25. But we have some good youth players who will be apprentices to them.

Please forget about the £90m players. Glazers will only give you money for 1 per season. It will take forever to fix the squad with £90m players.
You keep saying Rakitic will replace Matic. No he wouldn't.
Mertens is a forward not a midfielder. He wouldn't replace Mata.

Ofcourse they will be good squad additions not necessarily to replace Matic and Mata.
 

settembrini

Full Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2015
Messages
3,283
Fraser is far better on the left and rarely plays on the right. We literally haven't signed someone whose best position is on the right wing in over a decade. It's madness.
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
27,181
Fraser is far better on the left and rarely plays on the right. We literally haven't signed someone whose best position is on the right wing in over a decade. It's madness.
That's why we'll do it :lol:

Try him once on the right, then set him competing with Rashy, Martial, James and Sanchez (as he'll come back) on the left :wenger:
 

red woppit

Full Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2017
Messages
695
Location
Buchebi
Supports
Northampton Town
Fraser is far better on the left and rarely plays on the right. We literally haven't signed someone whose best position is on the right wing in over a decade. It's madness.
Exactly. Why would we be in for him, even on a free. I would rather go for Brooks, who is a left footed right sided midfielder/winger, and possibly Lewis Cook, a solid if unspectacular midfield player, who would put a shift in at the heart of the pitch.
 

bond19821982

Full Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
3,116
Exactly. Why would we be in for him, even on a free. I would rather go for Brooks, who is a left footed right sided midfielder/winger, and possibly Lewis Cook, a solid if unspectacular midfield player, who would put a shift in at the heart of the pitch.
Why would we go for him? He is still better than what we have now. Given how our budget has been, we don't have lot of options and a couple of free signings would actually makes sense.
 

AP88

Full Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2017
Messages
956
Location
Manchester
Supports
Man City
Exactly. Why would we be in for him, even on a free. I would rather go for Brooks, who is a left footed right sided midfielder/winger, and possibly Lewis Cook, a solid if unspectacular midfield player, who would put a shift in at the heart of the pitch.
Brooks and Fraser would both improve United, as would Ake (either in central defence, leftback or as a midfield anchor) or Wilson as a forward option.

Cook would also be a good addition - Garner will be much better eventually, but he’d be a good, mobile transitional addition to fill the Herrera void.
 

UNITED ACADEMY

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
2,098
I'm in for him if it's for free. Personally I don't think he's good enough if people are expecting him to be our starter. The expectation is higher here, but with our current situation, a free signing is no brainer for this guy.

He will be suitable for James & Rashford's backup. If we had this guy, we wouldn't be playing both Rashford & James together against Chelsea in the cup game & we could have rest at least one of them. He had one good season last season making a lot of assists and he took Bournemouth's corner kick as well which we also need to have someone who can take corner.
 

Gopher Brown

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2013
Messages
3,640
I'm in for him if it's for free. Personally I don't think he's good enough if people are expecting him to be our starter. The expectation is higher here, but with our current situation, a free signing is no brainer for this guy.

He will be suitable for James & Rashford's backup. If we had this guy, we wouldn't be playing both Rashford & James together against Chelsea in the cup game & we could have rest at least one of them. He had one good season last season making a lot of assists and he took Bournemouth's corner kick as well which we also need to have someone who can take corner.
Except, it’s not free is it?

A 4 year contract at £100k per week is worth £20.8m, plus signing on fee and things like bonuses.

If you would think he’s good enough for, let’s say £40m, then why is he good enough at all?
 

Posh Red

Full Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2013
Messages
993
Location
Peterborough, England
Except, it’s not free is it?

A 4 year contract at £100k per week is worth £20.8m, plus signing on fee and things like bonuses.

If you would think he’s good enough for, let’s say £40m, then why is he good enough at all?
It’s as free as signing as you will get. No one plays for free so I’m not sure what your point is
 

Carl

has permanently erect nipples
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
41,014
I'm in for him if it's for free. Personally I don't think he's good enough if people are expecting him to be our starter. The expectation is higher here, but with our current situation, a free signing is no brainer for this guy.

He will be suitable for James & Rashford's backup. If we had this guy, we wouldn't be playing both Rashford & James together against Chelsea in the cup game & we could have rest at least one of them. He had one good season last season making a lot of assists and he took Bournemouth's corner kick as well which we also need to have someone who can take corner.
Weird timing. Thought he was pretty poor today, along with pretty much everyone else on the pitch.
 

UNITED ACADEMY

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
2,098
Weird timing. Thought he was pretty poor today, along with pretty much everyone else on the pitch.
It wasn’t because based on today’s game. I just think that we needs a backup for James & Rashford, the most realistic & cheap option I can think of is this guy.
 

dev1l

Full Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2006
Messages
7,592
Due to his short stocky legs, he tends to tackle like Scholes.
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
18,491
Seems like he will be a Liverpool player in the January window