I agree with the first sentence. These days it seems it’s guilty until proven innocent with most people. The only reason I quoted was the sympathy as he deserves none. I don’t pass judgment on family stuff too but it’s bad to do to your brother and there is no real excuses.
I agree with that.
And, even if they're found innocent - which is made virtually impossible by the trial by (social) media, and the outrage an innocent verdict would create - it's just seen as they're guilty but got away with it.
In the past couple of years, all it takes is an
allegation of crimes along these lines and the accused is immediately assumed to be guilty, calls on social media and in the press lead them to lose their jobs and become pariahs, and any chance of a fair trial, or fair treatment in the press or anything, is made impossible as if they're found not guilty after all the hysteria based on their perceived guilt then there'd be a huge outcry, protests, outrage, etc. So it becomes a fait accompli even before the trial.
If the person is found guilty, when all the evidence has been carefully collected and considered and a fair trial has been completed, then they deserve to start receiving all the venom that they already get from the offset.
But throwing all that at them from the start, before the facts are fully known and they might turn out to be innocent and unfairly being put through hell and having their lives destroyed, is a very dangerous thing that has started to be seen as the 'right and moral' thing to do - and anyone who doesn't do it is 'defending abusers, sexists, racists,' etc. It isn't the 'right thing to do'. Not until the full facts are known and the verdict has been delivered.