Yeah, you shouldn’t maxi your paxi just yet.He’s obviously talking bollocks as we’ve heard nothing from NYSE. Twat.
Yeah, you shouldn’t maxi your paxi just yet.He’s obviously talking bollocks as we’ve heard nothing from NYSE. Twat.
I think it's important to differentiate between countries with a Muslim majority and literal theocracies where religion plays a dominant role in the state.There are sects of Muslims that are as Liberal or more Liberal than many Christians. But you want to wash the whole of the Islam religion as backwards and old testament.
There are Islamic countries that don't have this sort of violance to the degree suggested.
That should cover both Longstaff brothers but we need more.Apparently ole will get a 500m transfer kitty.
Uhh, yes.Guys, I don't really understand why you don't want this owner ?
Because they are morally not correct ?
They are not correct for the English perspective, but from their perspective, they are fine no ?
I mean, do you all think that the Glazers are better in terms of ethic ?
You would think yes.Seriously, wouldn't he be in trouble if he kept making false statements like this?
Just so you know Saudi's version of Islam is a pretty distorted/non mainstream one. They've done a good job of spreading that to other countries.I think it's important to differentiate between countries with a Muslim majority and literal theocracies where religion plays a dominant role in the state.
The former are just countries like any other; some are better, some are worse. The latter are something I'd rather avoid. Does that also apply to Christian theocracies? Certainly, but there's not a lot of those around anymore and none of them are rumoured to buy us.
It's worse than #soccer#power must be the cuntiest hashtag I've ever seen.
He’ll be lucky to have both of his mouse buttons intact come tomorrow morning.Seriously, wouldn't he be in trouble if he kept making false statements like this?
I heard it would be Zidane, who would get £1BN!Apparently ole will get a 500m transfer kitty.
Of course it did. Those big Yank flags were a dead giveaway!That stock exchange building lied to us.
Of course it did. Those big Yank flags were a dead giveaway!
And that's less cnuty than #cuntiest.It's worse than #soccer
Probably only for you mate because those numbers are way off. We're talking pounds here lets remember. You didn't get the Euro fee from 2000-2001 and convert it to GBP with the 2019 exchange rate did you?Zidane and Figo both cost more than 60 million at the time. Given his profile, Beckham was in that category. That was the expectation.
Probably only for you mate because those numbers are way off. We're talking pounds here lets remember.
Figo 2000 Barcelona to Real £37m
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/4761892/Figo-joins-Real-in-world-record-37.4m-deal.html
Zidane 2001 Juventus to Real £46m
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2001/jul/10/newsstory.sport1
As i said no chance anyone was paying £70m for Beckham in 2003 no matter his profile mate.
Doubt this will happen.I'm calling it now.
MBS taking over will be the best thing to happen to United since Fergie/Cantona/CR7.
This place going into meltdown will be the icing on the cake.
FfsTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Wow, this guy is really going in hard, isn't he? Very interesting.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Depends what the aim is.Bit of an odd statement. In terms of worth and room for improvement, you can't get much better than Man Utd as a prospective buyer.
https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/monetary-policy/inflation/inflation-calculator
If you factor in inflation these amounts would be:
Figo, 2000, 37m would equal 61.1m GBP in 2018.
Zidane, 2001, 46m would equal 74.7m GBP in 2018.
Also, for reference:
Beckham's 2003 transfer for 25m would be 38.8m in 2018.
He's not at all. He's saying they are and aren't interested. Covering all bases. He knows feck all and is just trying to drum up some attention.Wow, this guy is really going in hard, isn't he? Very interesting.
Yeah, why can't we put ourselves into the shoes of murderers for once ?Guys, I don't really understand why you don't want this owner ?
Because they are morally not correct ?
They are not correct for the English perspective, but from their perspective, they are fine no ?
I mean, do you all think that the Glazers are better in terms of ethic ? Probably as dirty as every billionaires in this world.
We can let them buy the club (if they do), we can judge them with their choices, if they put money on Old Trafford, on Carrington, on youth, and of course the first team.
It's the same thing here in France. The PSG owners are always contested because of their origins.
So guys, if they put money on my club, if they invest correctly I would be happy with every owners.
Cocks in ladsTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Yea, maybe. But we know how controlled the media is within SA, very odd if he keeps blurting out such rubbish.He's not at all. He's saying they are and aren't interested. Covering all bases. He knows feck all and is just trying to drum up some attention.
No idea. He could be bluffing or just testing the waters.Is it off?
I hate the Glazer's so much. They ruined usCocks in lads
If Glazers truly want something like £4bn, it's not going to be an easy sell at all.