Do you think that should've been a penalty? What about the second goal, wasn't the dutch player offside? What about the penalty on Oscar? Blind even had to come off because of the impact! What about the other penalty that shoul've been awarded for Brazil because of a hand ball? Now, what do you think?Did you think Silva should have been sent off early on?
Yes, lets talk about the other 20 decisions that went Holland's way (offside goal allowed, foul mutated into a penalty, 2 penalties that if the ref was 'bought' would've been callef), or should we just admit ref was bad?Did you think Silva should have been sent off early on?
You really confuse me sometimes. Half of your posts are against Brazil and half are in their favor.Also a place for the people who said "If Brazil loses, a civil war will ensue"
Because clearly these underdeveloped Brazilians only care about football
But its ok moderation, you did a great job
You very first post is a reply to me? And you still didn't answer?Do you think that should've been a penalty? What about the second goal, wasn't the dutch player offside? What about the penalty on Oscar? Blind even had to come off because of the impact! What about the other penalty that shoul've been awarded for Brazil because of a hand ball? Now, what do you think?
RedCafe has been ridiculously biased against Brazil this World Cup, to the point of it becoming a joke. Rejoice, who knows next time your team will get out of the group stage.
Ref in Colombia game didn't even give a yellow to Zuniga in two red card playsThere was no conspiracy but some of the referees like in the Croatia and Colombia games couldn't handle the pressure
from the crowd. That much was
obvious.
Ref was very bad and I don't think there's been a conspiracy at all and have never, ever suggested as such. People who suggest such things are best ignored.Yes, lets talk about the other 20 decisions that went Holland's way (offside goal allowed, foul mutated into a penalty, 2 penalties that if the ref was 'bought' would've been callef), or should we just admit ref was bad?
If there was a helping hand against Holland, the game could've been 2x0 for Brazil at the end of the second half! Despite the shitty performance! The two first dutch goals were results of bad calls, and Brazil had two clear penalties denied. And yet, in the match thread, all you see is people talking about the referee being a brazilian fan! You guys are nuts.Brazil were clearly given huge helping hands to get out of the group.
but even so...no amount helping hands can help such a shit team.
I don't think it was just the English, Italians and Spanish who were cheering against Brazil.Do you think that should've been a penalty? What about the second goal, wasn't the dutch player offside? What about the penalty on Oscar? Blind even had to come off because of the impact! What about the other penalty that shoul've been awarded for Brazil because of a hand ball? Now, what do you think?
RedCafe has been ridiculously biased against Brazil this World Cup, to the point of it becoming a joke. Rejoice, who knows next time your team will get out of the group stage.
don't worry....the pain will eventually recede.If there was a helping hand against Holland, the game could've been 2x0 for Brazil at the end of the second half! Despite the shitty performance! The two first dutch goals were results of bad calls, and Brazil had two clear penalties denied. And yet, in the match thread, all you see is people talking about the referee being a brazilian fan! You guys are nuts.
I hope they got paid, though.I'm sorry for referees carrying Brazil throughout the tournament.
He could send them off.Germany scored 5 goals in 30 mins. The referee took a look at Fred, Luiz and Julio Cesar and thought to himself there's only so much one ref can do...
First goal isn't a pen, but it is a straight red. Yellow and a penalty considering it was a third minute is better option of the two for Brazil than Netherlands.If there was a helping hand against Holland, the game could've been 2x0 for Brazil at the end of the second half! Despite the shitty performance! The two first dutch goals were results of bad calls, and Brazil had two clear penalties denied. And yet, in the match thread, all you see is people talking about the referee being a brazilian fan! You guys are nuts.
Don't worry, I'm just fine. =)don't worry....the pain will eventually recede.
What reason would people have to dislike Brazil before the tournament? Most on here are from the UK or Ireland.If there was a helping hand against Holland, the game could've been 2x0 for Brazil at the end of the second half! Despite the shitty performance! The two first dutch goals were results of bad calls, and Brazil had two clear penalties denied. And yet, in the match thread, all you see is people talking about the referee being a brazilian fan! You guys are nuts.
just banter mate.Don't worry, I'm just fine. =)
In fact, I just had an awesome day in São Paulo, getting to know the city cultural center. Lot's of people dancing, rehearsing, reading, watching movies and listening to music. I had a great feijoada for lunch, the place was brimming! The skies were blue, with a little bit of a chilly wind. People smiling on the streets, talking about the weekend and the millions of options of what they could do. Now I'm off to a party in a friends house, full of nice and beautiful people, expecting to take some beautiful pictures.
What about you, how are you doing?
I guess at least Manchester has Elbow.
http://i.imgur.com/DXcZTHS.jpgWhat reason would people have to dislike Brazil before the tournament? Most on here are from the UK or Ireland.
I know you can say van Persie and van Gaal are involved so the United fans want Holland to win, but since the first game when Croatia had three decisions that went against them the reffing has been in Brazil's favour. Brazil fouled Colombia and Holland all game when they played them, the ref was very lenient. I'm not saying that the refs were paid off or any conspiracy like that, but it's clear that pressure from the crowd with the tournament where it was became too much and they lost control.
This. Don't think there was any active conspiracy or directive to push Brazil forwards but it seemed evident to most neutrals that some of the refs seemed pressurised to be more lenient to Brazil. Whether that was because of coded pressure emanating from FIFA to keep the hosts in the tournament or because they let the crowd get to them, isn't of too much consequence - point is Brazil noticeably got a raft of favourable decisions throughout the tournament. They got away with murder (almost literally) in the Colombia game and Croatia were robbed.There was no conspiracy but some of the referees like in the Croatia and Colombia games couldn't handle the pressure from the crowd. That much was obvious.
It's nothing to do with 'wanting to see it that way', as I tried to explain in the opening line. I'm from the UK. I have no allegiance to either team, nor do many others that agree that Brazil have had favourable reffing and that they played dirty throughout the tournament.http://i.imgur.com/DXcZTHS.jpg
Brazil fouling Colombia and getting away with it! The ref was as lenient for Colombia as he was for Brazil, it's just that you didn't want to see it that way.