Berbaclass
Fallen Muppet. Lest we never forget
Quite an interesting thought this, actually don't hate the suggestion. Whether or not it's true though...
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
If it works like transfer windows then you can't bring in new managers, you could sack the current manager and just have the assistant take his place until the next windowWould potentially end up working against them, they’d still get ‘sacked’ if they underperformed, but would just be put on gardening leave and then be forced to wait almost half a season before they could work again.
Or it just gets agreed outside the window that x manager will leave and y manager will come in once the window opens.Stupid idea. Imagine the carnage in January when half the managers get binned? You'll get less time as a manager because if you're having some shaky form coming into the window you're just going to get fired without getting the chance to turn it around because teams don't want to get relegated.
So like it is now but instead you'll have to wait 4 months knowing that is going to happen and come to work everyday and manage the team?Or it just gets agreed outside the window that x manager will leave and y manager will come in once the window opens.
I mean they are paid to so yeah?So like it is now but instead you'll have to wait 4 months knowing that is going to happen and come to work everyday and manage the team?
This is very different than just going to the office to work a notice period.I mean they are paid to so yeah?
How is it different to what Tuchel or Klopp is currently doing?This is very different than just going to the office to work a notice period.
They haven't been sacked. They're either resigning or finishing up their contracts and leaving. People get sacked for being bad at their job, imagine we had to keep Ole, Moyes or Mourinho until the end of the season despite the shite they were churning out week after week? How is that a good situation for anyone involved?How is it different to what Tuchel or Klopp is currently doing?
But surely if this rule was to come into action you'd see fewer 'sackings' as a result as teams would have to be more proactive than reactive. Also possibly shorter term deals a possibility?They haven't been sacked. They're either resigning or finishing up their contracts and leaving. People get sacked for being bad at their job, imagine we had to keep Ole, Moyes or Mourinho until the end of the season despite the shite they were churning out week after week? How is that a good situation for anyone involved?
Nah, you'll get more knee jerk sackings going into the window because that's your last chance before the end of the season to change the manager. The next time you get the chance to do so you might have already missed out on CL football or been relegated.But surely if this rule was to come into action you'd see fewer 'sackings' as a result as teams would have to be more proactive than reactive. Also possibly shorter term deals a possibility?
Not saying it's a brilliant idea just found the concept interesting.
So we end up with managers still getting sacked but in a predetermined period of the season? I don't think in theory that's an awful idea.Nah, you'll get more knee jerk sackings going into the window because that's your last chance before the end of the season to change the manager. The next time you get the chance to do so you might have already missed out on CL football or been relegated.
But its counter productive to what it's trying to achieve. If you want managers to have more time then win games. Forcing them to stay in a job that's gone toxic isn't going to help the situation, and for the most part managers only go when it gets to that point and the players stop playing for them. With a window you're asking boards to proactively sack managers if they think there's a chance that might happen in the second half of the season. We've seen it enough times, by keeping managers too long, that is simply doesn't work to keep them around. We're all just waiting around for the inevitable to happen.So we end up with managers still getting sacked but in a predetermined period of the season? I don't think in theory that's an awful idea.
Maybe in reality it might not work but again it's just an interesting proposal and I've not really thought about it in depth and what the potential effects may or may not be.
Is the potential toxicity not based on the current system where the players have too much power and a manager could literally go at any point? If there are windows then it could take some of that power away from the players as they know it won't be like that anymore.But its counter productive to what it's trying to achieve. If you want managers to have more time then win games. Forcing them to stay in a job that's gone toxic isn't going to help the situation, and for the most part managers only go when it gets to that point and the players stop playing for them. With a window you're asking boards to proactively sack managers if they think there's a chance that might happen in the second half of the season. We've seen it enough times, by keeping managers too long, that is simply doesn't work to keep them around. We're all just waiting around for the inevitable to happen.
Dying would be a sweet release for someone who has been asked to sit at one place for 6 months at a timewhat if a manager dies and can't be moved on until January? seems a bit unfair
The players should hold most of the power. You don't want a workplace that's run by a dictator. A good manager will get people onside or move them on if they're toxic. The worst thing you can do is give a bad manager more time than they deserve. You will lose all your best players.Is the potential toxicity not based on the current system where the players have too much power and a manager could literally go at any point? If there are windows then it could take some of that power away from the players as they know it won't be like that anymore.
Can't agree with this.The players should hold most of the power. You don't want a workplace that's run by a dictator. A good manager will get people onside or move them on if they're toxic. The worst thing you can do is give a bad manager more time than they deserve. You will lose all your best players.
United's most successful manager was a footballing dictator!The players should hold most of the power. You don't want a workplace that's run by a dictator. A good manager will get people onside or move them on if they're toxic. The worst thing you can do is give a bad manager more time than they deserve. You will lose all your best players.
He earned it through constantly winning. It's not a right of management.United's most successful manager was a footballing dictator!
The stick Antony gets is completely unwarrentedIf ETH can find a way to take Antony with him, he can leave whenever he wants.
Obviously my comment was tongue in cheek. But completely unwarranted? Disagree.The stick Antony gets is completely unwarrented
Turkeys voting for no Christmas.Quite an interesting thought this, actually don't hate the suggestion. Whether or not it's true though...
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I think Spurs did this with Conte and had his assistant step in when they sacked him.If it works like transfer windows then you can't bring in new managers, you could sack the current manager and just have the assistant take his place until the next window